Literature DB >> 32478151

Dataset on The Cultural Dimension of Urban Society Food Consumption in Indonesia.

Francisia Sse Seda1, Lugina Setyawati1, Timoti Tirta1, Kevin Nobel1.   

Abstract

This article introduces a dataset that presents the cultural values and practices of food consumption patterns in major urban communities in Indonesian cities. The data illustrate the cultural characteristics of urban residents' food consumption patterns based on social class categories. Data collection was conducted in five major Indonesian cities through face-to-face interviews with 710 respondents identified using a stratified random sampling technique. The data show that culture has a dominant influence on the pattern of food consumption of urban communities in Indonesia in comparison with economic and health dimensions. Although the value and practice sub-dimensions are conceptually related, the cultural dimension of food consumption patterns in the five urban communities is more dominated by religious value than other cultural practices. Regarding food consumption patterns, urban upper classes are more dominantly influenced by economic dimensions and modern healthy lifestyles than cultural dimensions.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumerism; Cultural dimension of food consumption; Social class; Urban society

Year:  2020        PMID: 32478151      PMCID: PMC7251649          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specification table

Value of the data

The cultural indicators of food consumption can significantly complement global consumerism literature, which is dominated by analyses of the economic and social dimensions of food consumption. In the era of economic globalization, these indicators and data are very important for scholars who are interested in developing an integrative consumerism index, which may be a valid and reliable instrument for research on the cultural characteristics of urban communities in developing countries. These data and indicators are also important for the formulation of governmental policies regarding social welfare and the implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals within the scope of the socio-cultural dimension. These data and indicators also present important insights for non-governmental organizations to optimize the cultural dimension in poverty alleviation programs. A comprehensive understanding of the domestic economy at the micro level can provide input for the government in the formulation of policies to accommodate the economic process of consumerism.

Data description

The dataset in this article describes the cultural characteristics of urban residents’ food consumption patterns gathered through field surveys conducted in 2015-2016. Table 1 presents a categorization of respondents’ demographic data [1]. In Table 2, the authors categorize respondents by lower, middle, and upper social class households in Indonesia's five major cities. Table 3 presents dimensions, sub-dimensions, and indicators that were used in this survey. Table 4 shows the sample and response rate numbers. Table 5 describes the type of data analysis. Table 6 presents respondents’ incomes and expenditures, while Figure 1 shows the consideration factors of household food consumption. Table 7 categorizes income and expenditure based on the three factors of health, price, and cultural issues. Figure 2 shows the value and practice sub-dimensions by social class. Lastly, Table 8 presents the consideration factors of household food consumption.
Table 1

Descriptive Statistics of Demographic Data.

GenderHighest Education
 Male (%)42,1 Primary school (%)3,4
 Female (%)57,9 Junior high school (%)5,2
Average Age (years)41,3 Senior high school (%)25,5
Religion Diploma (%)22,0
 Islam (%)60,1 Bachelor's degree (%)29,9
 Catholic (%)14,2 Master's and doctoral degree (%)14,1
 Protestant (%)15,8Lived in urban areas (average years)28,7
 Hindu (%)9,3Occupation
 Buddhist (%)0,4 Government employee (%)28,5
 Other (%)0,1 Police officer/Military (%)4,2
Ethnicity Employee of a private company (%)28,9
 Java (%)40,7 Teacher/Lecturer (%)2,8
 Sunda (%)13,7 Entrepreneur (%)27,2
 Minang (%)8,6 Independent worker (%)8,5
 Bali (%)10,3Social Class
 Batak (%)7,2 Lower (%)34,5
 Madura (%)8,2 Middle (%)36,2
 Bugis (%)3,5 Upper (%)29,3
 Other (%)7,9Average number of household members6
CityProvince
 Jakarta (%)24,5 DKI Jakarta (%)24,5
 Bandung (%)21,1 West Java (%)21,1
 Surabaya (%)16,6 East Java (%)16,6
 Makassar (%)16,9 South Sulawesi (%)16,9
 Denpasar (%)20,8 Bali (%)20,8
Table 2

Distribution of Respondent by Social Class and City.

CityLower Class
Middle Class
Upper Class
Freq.(%)Freq.%Freq.%
Jakarta6537,45732,85229,9
Bandung5033,35738,04328,7
Surabaya4033,94336,43529,7
Makassar4134,24436,73529,2
Denpasar5033,85537,24329,1
Total/Average24634,525636,220829,3
Table 3

Cultural Dimension and Indicators.

DimensionSub-DimensionIndicatorsAdapted References
CULTURALCULTURAL VALUES• Religious values/principles regarding types of food[2]
Subsistent consumption activities associated with food (primary, secondary, and tertiary) of individuals and families affected by a set of cultural elementsCultural values or principles that serve as a reference in making choices related to food consumption• Religious values/principles regarding locations for eating• Religious values/principles regarding consumption patterns• Traditional/cultural values regarding types of foods• Value of tradition/customs regarding locations for eating• Traditional/customary values regarding consumption patterns

CULTURAL PRACTICES• The practice of buying foods recommended by religious rules[3], [4], [5], [6], [7]
Cultural practices related to food consumption are carried out because they refer to cultural principles and values• The practice of buying recommended types of food according to customary traditions• The practice of choosing to buy food in safe places according to religious rules• Consumption patterns based on religious rules• The practice of consuming certain traditional foods
Table 4

Survey Sample and Response Rate.

CitySampleResponse rateSub-districts
Jakarta17476%4
Bandung15081%2
Surabaya11882%4
Makassar12084%3
Denpasar14887%2
Total/Average71082%3
Table 5

Type of Data Analysis.

AnalysisAspectsDataDetail
UnivariateDemographic informationCity, Province, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Religion, Education level, Occupation, Social class, Number of household membersFrequency table, bar chart, mean, %
Income and expenditureHousehold income, household expenditure, Household expenditure for foodMean
Consumption aspectsCultural aspects, Health and price principal of food consumptionMean
Crosstab analysisConsumption aspectsCultural aspects, Health and price principal of food consumption by social class, religion, and ethnicityCrosstable
Table 6

Income and Expenditure Characteristics.

Average of total household income/month (in million IDR)6,7
Lower Class3,6
Middle Class5,9
Upper Class11,2
Frequency of income reception
Daily34,1
Weekly36,9
Monthly29,0
Average of total household expenditure/month (in million IDR)6,4
Lower Class3,4
Middle Class5,6
Upper Class10,8
Monthly household expenditure For Food (%)42,9
Lower Class59,7
Middle Class40,4
Upper Class26,4
Figure 1

Consideration factors for household food consumption.

Table 7

Income and expenditure characteristics based on three factors.

Health issues3.4
Lower Class2.8
Middle Class3.4
Upper Class3.9
Price issues3.1
Lower Class3.5
Middle Class3.2
Upper Class2.7
Cultural issues3.8
Lower Class4.2
Middle Class3.9
Upper Class3.2
Figure 2

Value and practice sub-dimensions by social class.

Table 8

Mean data of Value and Practice indicators.

Sub-dimensionIndicatorsMean
VALUEReligious values/principles regarding types of food4.4
Religious values/principles regarding locations for eating4.1
Religious values/principles regarding consumption patterns4.2
Traditional/cultural values regarding types of food4
Value of tradition/customs regarding locations for eating3.6
Traditional/customary values regarding consumption patterns3.6
PRACTICEThe practice of buying foods recommended by religious rules3.9
The practice of buying recommended types of food according to customary traditions3.4
The practice of choosing to buy food in safe places according to religious rules3.7
Consumption patterns based on religious rules3.4
The practice of consuming certain traditional foods3.5
Descriptive Statistics of Demographic Data. Distribution of Respondent by Social Class and City. Cultural Dimension and Indicators. Survey Sample and Response Rate. Type of Data Analysis. Income and Expenditure Characteristics. Consideration factors for household food consumption. Income and expenditure characteristics based on three factors. Value and practice sub-dimensions by social class. Mean data of Value and Practice indicators. The majority of the respondents were female (58%). Considering religious affiliation, the majority of respondents were Muslim (60.1%) which reflects the majority religion in Indonesia. The majority of respondents came from the Javanese ethnic group (40.7%) who are spread across the five cities that were surveyed, while other ethnicities are the majority in certain cities, such as the Sundanese in Bandung, the Balinese in Denpasar, and the Bugis in Makassar. The average age of respondents was 41.3 years and on average, they had lived in the city or another urban area for around 28.7 years. The majority of respondents had a bachelor's degree (29.9%), high school education (25.5%), a diploma (22%), and a postgraduate degree – master's and doctoral level of education (14.1%). Respondents’ level of education may have had implications on their food consumption choices, depicting dynamics of economic rationality in combination with cultural values [8]. Most of the respondents worked as employees of private companies (28.9%), public servants (28.5%), entrepreneurs (27.2%), and independent workers (8.5%). Table 2 shows the distribution of respondents in this survey, with the middle class as the largest group. This does not proportionally represent people by class in the selected cities. Based on official statistical data, the upper social class in urban Indonesia still makes up less than 20% of the population.

Experimental design, materials, and method

This survey elaborates the cultural dimensions of consumerism, particularly focusing on the sub-dimensions of cultural values and cultural practice. Each sub-dimension is operationalized into a number of indicators to measure the workings of cultural aspects in the dynamics of food consumption at the household level [9]. These indicators are then developed in a questionnaire instrument. The following table operationalizes the concept of the cultural dimension: All of the items in the cultural aspect in this dataset were measured using a five-point Likert scale. The questionnaire also included questions regarding respondents’ demographic characteristics and household income and expenditure and control questions about the importance of health factors and price factors in influencing food consumption. Respondents to this survey were heads of household or their companions aged between 18 and 65 years in five major cities of Indonesia. These cities were chosen because they represent the major cities in Indonesia with diverse ethnic and religious heterogeneities within the scope of the urban context. In order to analyze social class, sampling in each city was conducted using a stratified sampling technique in the following stages: first, four sub-districts were randomly selected as the survey area; second, data were identified and a list of household populations was compiled for each sub-district; third, households were stratified based on their social class; fourth, proportional sampling of each household group was conducted based on their social class. The following table presents the number of survey samples and their proportions in each category of social class: Data were collected through a survey of 710 respondents from five major cities in Indonesia: Jakarta with 174 samples, Bandung with 150 samples, Surabaya with 118 samples, Denpasar with 148 samples, and Makassar with 120 samples. The survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews, with which the research team was assisted by several local enumerators from local universities. The response rate of 82% indicates that the main samples in this survey were not all able to participate in data collection and an 18% reserve sample had to be used as substitutes. Before the analysis was conducted, data were first processed through a process of coding, entering, and cleaning performed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) program. The data were then processed by aggregation (computing) and re-categorization or recoding, especially for questions concerning the cultural dimension. The final step in processing data is to output data such as frequency tables and graphs. The data were analyzed using univariate analysis and cross table analysis. A number of questions related to demographic information were analyzed univariately by examining the largest percentage and the size of the concentration of the data, such as the mean. Cross-table analysis was mainly used on cultural aspects, which tend to be based on social class. These survey data show the importance of the cultural dimension in understanding considerations concerning health, price, and cultural issues [10]. Cultural issues are shown as the most important factor in household food consumption, followed by health and price considerations [11], [12]. Table 7 shows the influence of social class on the factors of household food consumption [13], [14]. The outcome shows different numbers in every factor. The cultural dimension is observed from the sub-dimensions of value and practice. Value is related to the influence of religious and traditional values on households’ food consumption patterns, while practice is related to practices or habits of food consumption patterns that are carried out in accordance with religious values or traditional values [4]. The survey data show that the sub-dimension of value (4.0) is more dominant in forming eating patterns than the sub-dimension of practice (3.6) [15]. Lastly, Table 8 presents the mean value of indicators based on value and practice categorization.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Francisia SSE Seda: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Lugina Setyawati: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - original draft. Timoti Tirta: Validation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Kevin Nobel: Writing - review & editing.
SubjectSociology, consumerism
Specific subject areaCultural dimension of food consumption, urban lifestyle, social class
Type of dataTables, figures
How data were acquiredField survey
Data formatRaw and descriptive
Parameter for data collectionThe questionnaire was developed to measure the cultural dimension of food consumption. A set of indicators are operationalized from the sub-dimensions of cultural values and cultural practice. All items related to the cultural dimension in this dataset are measured using a five-point Likert scale.
The questionnaire also gathered respondents’ demographic characteristics, household income and expenditure, and the importance of health and price factors in their food consumption patterns
Description of data collectionData were collected through a survey of 710 respondents from five major cities in Indonesia: Jakarta with 174 samples, Bandung with 150 samples, Surabaya with 118 samples, Makassar with 120 samples, and Denpasar with 148 samples.
Samples were drawn using a stratified random sampling technique to obtain proportional samples of each social class. The surveys were conducted through face-to-face interviews, with which the research team was assisted by several local enumerators from local universities.
Data source locationIndonesia
Data accessibilityData included in this article
Related research articleConsumerism Indicators Construction: A Portrait of Household Food Consumption in Surabaya. Global Journal of Human Social Science Vol 14: 7
  5 in total

1.  The Contribution of Food Consumption to Well-Being.

Authors:  Mark D Holder
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.374

2.  Role of expendable income and price in food choice by low income families.

Authors:  Cate Burns; Kay Cook; Helen Mavoa
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Factors which influence the consumption of street foods and fast foods in South Africa--a national survey.

Authors:  Nelia P Steyn; Demetre Labadarios; Johanna H Nel
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Factors Affecting Consumer Food Preferences: Food Taste and Depression-Based Evoked Emotional Expressions with the Use of Face Reading Technology.

Authors:  Elena Bartkiene; Vesta Steibliene; Virginija Adomaitiene; Grazina Juodeikiene; Darius Cernauskas; Vita Lele; Dovile Klupsaite; Daiva Zadeike; Laura Jarutiene; Raquel P F Guiné
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The Impact of Food Service Attributes on Customer Satisfaction in a Rural University Campus Environment.

Authors:  Mireille Serhan; Carole Serhan
Journal:  Int J Food Sci       Date:  2019-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.