| Literature DB >> 32477851 |
Kelsey Logan1,2, Rhodri S Lloyd3, Tara Schafer-Kalkhoff4, Jane C Khoury5,6,7, Shelley Ehrlich6,7, Lawrence M Dolan5,6, Amy S Shah5,6, Gregory D Myer1,8,9.
Abstract
Examining association between serial participation in youth organized sports (OS) and concurrent cardiometabolic risk factors, with long-term health status, will aid understanding the role of OS participation. Combining data from a prospective study and a follow-up survey, we aimed to determine association between youth OS participation and cardiometabolic risk factors with health and physical activity (PA) in young adulthood. Cardiometabolic risk factors were monitored yearly, and OS involvement through middle school, high school, and college, together with current status was recorded 12 years after the initial study began; 462 participants completed follow-up. Cardiometabolic risk factors included: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides, fasting glucose and insulin. Participants continuing OS participation from middle to high school and/or college had significantly lower BMI/BMI z-scores [24.7 vs 27.4 (p < 0.05) and 0.51 vs 0.82 (p < 0.05), respectively] and significantly higher HDL [48.7 vs 45.4 (p ≤ 0.05)] than those without OS participation after middle school. Waist circumference of females was significantly smaller in those who participated in OS from middle to high school and/or college (84.9 cm) compared to those who had no OS (92.1 cm), (p < 0.05). Participants continuing OS from middle to high school and/or college reported significantly higher follow-up PA levels than those who had no OS after middle school (p < 0.001). This study provides novel data showing serial participation in OS from middle to high school and/or college was associated with a superior cardiometabolic health profile in school and increased PA levels at 12-year follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiometabolic; Diabetes; Health profile; Physical activity; Risk factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 32477851 PMCID: PMC7248647 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med Rep ISSN: 2211-3355
Fig. 1Participant flow diagram.
Demographics for those “Fully completing the survey” compared with those “Not fully completing the survey”.
| Variable (n = 1243) | Fully completed survey (n = 462) | Did not fully complete survey (n = 781) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | <0.0001 | ||
| Female | 298 (64.5) | 377 (48.3) | |
| Male | 164 (35.5) | 404 (51.7) | |
| Race / Ethnicity | 0.10* | ||
| Asian | 10 (2.2) | 8 (1.0) | |
| African-American | 174 (37.7) | 316 (40.5) | |
| Hispanic | 2 (0.4) | 14 (1.8) | |
| Mixed | 6 (1.3) | 10 (1.3) | |
| Caucasian | 270 (58.4) | 431 (55.2) | |
| WI | 0 | 2 (0.3) | |
| African-American | 174 (37.7) | 316 (40.5) | 0.33 |
| Hispanic | 2 (0.4) | 14 (1.8) | 0.04* |
Data presented as n (%). Chi-square used for testing or *Fisher’s exact test.
Demographics and biometrics measures by OS participation.
| Total | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at follow-up (years) | 26.2 (2.3) | 26.4 (2.3) | 26.1 (2.5) | 26.1 (2.2) | 0.31 |
| Sex (Female) | 298 (64.5%) | 84 (67.7%) | 59a (76.6%) | 155b (59.4%) | 0.01 |
| Race (African-American) | 174 (37.7%) | 69a (55.6%) | 35a (45.4%) | 70b (26.8%) | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2)Ϯ | 25.7 (0.34) | 27.4a (0.64) | 26.4 (0.82) | 24.7b (0.44) | 0.001 |
| BMI z-score | 0.66 (1.07) | 0.82a (1.17) | 0.79 (1.05) | 0.51b (0.99) | 0.01 |
| Waist circumference (cm)Ϯ | 87.6 (0.79) | 91.3a (1.47) | 90.5a (1.88) | 85.2b (1.00) | 0.0008 |
| Waist circumference (cm) -femalesϮ | 87.9 (0.93) | 92.1a (1.72) | 90.2 (2.06) | 84.9b (1.27) | 0.002 |
| Waist circumference (cm) -malesϮ | 87.3 (1.29) | 89.5 (2.61) | 91.9 (3.89) | 85.7 (1.60) | 0.22 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg)Ϯ | 115 (0.47) [n = 444] | 117 (0.91) [n = 113] | 115 (1.12) [n = 75] | 115 (0.60) [n = 181] | 0.21 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg)Ϯ | 69.7 (0.33) [n = 444] | 70.0 (0.63) [n = 113] | 69.8 (0.79) [n = 75] | 69.5 (0.4) [n = 181] | 0.82 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)Ϯ | 148 (1.28) | 150 (2.41) | 148 (3.08) | 147 (1.65) | 0.64 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)Ϯ | 47.5 (0.57) | 45.4a (1.06) | 46.4 (1.35) | 48.7b (0.72) | 0.03 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)Ϯ | 84.0 (1.11) | 87.8a (2.07) | 85.0 (2.65) | 82.0b (1.42) | 0.06 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)Ϯ | 81.8 (1.95) | 82.0 (3.68) | 83.2 (4.71) | 81.3 (2.52) | 0.93 |
| Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio | 1.61 (1.03) | 1.67 (1.05) | 1.68 (1.07) | 1.56 (1.04) | 0.56 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL)Ϯ | 83.4 (0.64) | 84.2 (1.12) | 82.3 (1.44) | 83.3 (0.88) | 0.59 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L)Ϯ | 160 (9.58) | 162 (16.8) | 173 (21.7) | 154 (13.2) | 0.75 |
Data presented as mean (standard deviation), least square mean (standard error) or n (%); least square means and associated standard error are reported when adjusting for age and sex or age only. The Triglyceride/HDL ratio is presented as geometric least square mean (geometric standard deviation) due to distribution necessitating analysis using log transformed data.
‘a’ denotes difference from ‘b’ p < 0.05, adjusted using Dunnett’s test (age and BMI z-score) or Tukey-Kramer adjustment (continuous variables except age and BMI z-score or Bonferroni (sex and race) as appropriate.
Group 1 – No, No, No (Middle, High School, and College); Group 2 – Yes, No, No; Group 3 – Yes, Yes, No and Yes, Yes, Yes.
BMI = Body Mass Index (weight (kg) / height (m)2).
Age and sex adjusted.
Age adjusted.
Self-reported health history at follow-up by participation group.†
| Health history | Total | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 462 | 124 | 77 | 261 | |
| Cancer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cardiovascular disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Diabetes (any type) | 12 (2.6%) | 3 (2.4%) | 3 (3.9%) | 6 (2.3%) | 0.66 |
| High cholesterol | 23 (5.0%) | 7 (5.6%) | 5 (6.5%) | 11 (4.2%) | 0.59 |
| Hypertension | 26 (5.6%) | 9 (7.3%) | 4 (5.2%) | 13 (5.0%) | 0.64 |
| Kidney disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatty Liver disease | 1 (0.2%) | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | 0 | 0.44 |
| Other | 29 (6.3%) | 9 (7.3%) | 6 (7.8%) | 14 (5.4%) | 0.58 |
| None of above (response) | 375 (81.2%) | 96 (77.4%) | 59 (76.6%) | 220 (84.3%) | 0.15 |
| None (no “yes” to any of above) | 378 (81.8%) | 99 (79.8%) | 59 (76.6%) | 220 (84.3%) | 0.09 |
Data presented as mean (standard deviation) or n (%).
Group 1 – No, No, No (Middle, High School, and College); Group 2 – Yes, No, No; Group 3 – Yes, Yes, No and Yes, Yes, Yes.
p-value from Fisher’s exact test.
Current activity level by youth activity group.†
| Total | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total of MARS scores (0 to 16) | 6.33 (0.20) | 4.21a (0.40) | 5.92b (0.49) | 7.35c (0.26) | <0.0001* |
| Tegner activity scale (0 to 10) | 4.18 (0.09) | 3.15a (0.17) | 3.86b (0.21) | 4.69c (0.11) | <0.0001* |
Data presented as least square mean (standard error) or n (%); least square means and associated standard error are reported as measures are adjusted for age and sex.
MARS = Marx Activity Rating Scale.
*‘a’ different from ‘b’ different from ‘c’, all p < 0.05, adjusted using Tukey- Kramer
Group 1 – No, No, No (Middle, High School, and College); Group 2 – Yes, No, No; Group 3 – Yes, Yes, No and Yes, Yes, Yes.