Pengcheng Fu1, Jiachen Liu2, Qinqin Bai3, Xingang Sun3, Zhenjia Yao3, Lirong Liu3, Cuimei Wu3, Gaiqing Wang4. 1. Department of Neurology, Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 187 Guanlan St., 518110, China. 2. Clinical Medicine, Xiangya Medical College of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 3. Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. 4. Department of Neurology, SanYa Central Hospital (The Third People's Hospital of HaiNan Province), 146 Jiefang forth Rd, SanYa, HaiNan, 372000, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hematoma is the chief culprit in brain injury following intracranial cerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Noninvasive hematoma clearance could be an option to prevent and alleviate early brain injury after ICH. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) and nuclear factor-erythroid 2 related factor-2 (Nrf2) facilitate removal of hematoma in ICH. Monascin acts as the natural Nrf2 activator with PPAR-γ agonist, and the long-term effects of monascin following ICH have not been elucidated. METHODS: ICH in rats was induced by stereotactic, intrastriatal injection of type IV collagenase. Monascin was administered twice daily by gastric perfusion for 14 days after ICH induction. Long-term neurological scores (T maze, Garcia scales, rotor rod test, and Morris water maze), hematoma volume, as well as iron overload around hematoma and brain atrophy were evaluated at 7, 14, and 28 days after ICH. RESULTS: The results showed that monascin improved long-term neurological deficits, spatial memory performance, learning ability, and brain shrinkage after ICH. Monascin also reduced hematoma volume at 7 days and iron content at 7 and 14 days after ICH. CONCLUSION: PPAR γ and Nrf2 play a crucial role in hematoma clearance after ICH in rat. As a dual agonist of PPAR γ and Nrf2, monascin improved long-term outcomes by facilitating hematoma clearance, and by attenuating iron overload and brain atrophy after experimental ICH.
BACKGROUND: Hematoma is the chief culprit in brain injury following intracranial cerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Noninvasive hematoma clearance could be an option to prevent and alleviate early brain injury after ICH. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) and nuclear factor-erythroid 2 related factor-2 (Nrf2) facilitate removal of hematoma in ICH. Monascin acts as the natural Nrf2 activator with PPAR-γ agonist, and the long-term effects of monascin following ICH have not been elucidated. METHODS: ICH in rats was induced by stereotactic, intrastriatal injection of type IV collagenase. Monascin was administered twice daily by gastric perfusion for 14 days after ICH induction. Long-term neurological scores (T maze, Garcia scales, rotor rod test, and Morris water maze), hematoma volume, as well as iron overload around hematoma and brain atrophy were evaluated at 7, 14, and 28 days after ICH. RESULTS: The results showed that monascin improved long-term neurological deficits, spatial memory performance, learning ability, and brain shrinkage after ICH. Monascin also reduced hematoma volume at 7 days and iron content at 7 and 14 days after ICH. CONCLUSION: PPAR γ and Nrf2 play a crucial role in hematoma clearance after ICH in rat. As a dual agonist of PPAR γ and Nrf2, monascin improved long-term outcomes by facilitating hematoma clearance, and by attenuating iron overload and brain atrophy after experimental ICH.
Brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) initially occurs within the first
few hours as a result of mass effects due to hematoma formation. Continued insults
after primary hemorrhage are believed to be caused by intraparenchymal blood
lysis.[1,2] Since hematoma
is the chief culprit of brain injury following ICH, appropriate removal of hematomas
is crucial to prevent and alleviate early brain insults after ICH. However, surgical
removal of hematomas has not achieved the expected results.[3] Although preliminary studies suggest that minimally invasive hematoma removal
may reduce secondary neurotoxicity,[4,5] the effects of hematoma
shrinkage on clinical outcome remain unclear.[6] Therefore, targeting hematoma clearance by promoting an endogenous garbage
scavenging system is promising for ICH.Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) -γ, which is a part of the nuclear
hormone receptor superfamily, can regulate the expression of CD36 and CD163, which
participate in phagocytosis.[7-9] In addition,
PPAR-γ agonist enhanced CD36 and CD163 expression, accelerated hematoma resolution,
then improved neurological deficits.[9-11] Nuclear factor-erythroid
2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and PPAR-γ play similar roles in phagocytosis and hematoma
resolution following ICH.[8,12-14] Monascin is a natural dual
activator of both PPAR-γ and Nrf2, and is produced using a unique and natural
fermentation process in China. Monascin constitutes one of the azaphilonoid pigments
in the extracts of Monascus pilosus-fermented rice (red mold rice).[15] Our previous study demonstrated that monascin was neuroprotective by
facilitating hematoma clearance through the haptoglobin-hemoglobin-CD163 pathway in
ICH.[9,16] This study
aims to further evaluate the long-term effects of monascin in an experimental
ICH.
Materials and methods
Animals were randomized to control and experimental groups. Neurobehavioral testing
as well as quantitative data collection were conducted in a blinded fashion (animals
and sample tubes were marked by numbers, without any identifiers of group
allocation).
Animals
All procedures in this study were approved by Animal Utilization and Management
Committee at Shanxi Medical University, and comply with the National Institutes
of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male SD rats
(12 weeks old, weight 275 g ± 25 g, Animal Experimental Center of Shanxi Medical
University) were given free access to food and water.
ICH model
The procedure for inducing ICH by stereotactic injection of bacterial collagenase
(0.5 U typeIV dissolved in 2 μl saline, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) into
the basal ganglia was performed as described in our previous publication.[2] Sham-operated rats were subjected to needle insertion only. Vital signs
were monitored throughout surgery and recovery period. Neurofunctional testing
was performed at preselected time points after ICH induction (7, 14, and
28 days). After neurofunctional testing, animals were euthanized, and brain
tissues were collected for measurements of hematoma volume, hemoglobin levels,
iron staining, iron contents, weights of right and left hemispheres, and
cerebral atrophy.
Experimental design
A total of 72 male SD rats were used in the experiment. Animals were added if
they died before the research endpoint. There were no significant differences in
the mortality rates between the different experimental groups. The 72 rats were
divided equally into three groups: sham, ICH+ vehicle (sterile normal saline),
and ICH+ monascin (10 mg/kg). The rats in each group were further divided
equally into three subgroups according to the different time point of evaluation
and then euthanasia (7, 14, or 28 days). Monascin was administered twice daily
by gastric perfusion at 6 h after ICH for 14 days. Long-term neurofunctional
testing (modified Garcia scale, T-maze, and rotor rod tests ) were evaluated at
14 days and 28 days after ICH; Morris water maze tests were conducted between 23
and 28 days after ICH induction. Hemoglobin levels, iron contents, and weights
of right and left cerebral hemispheres were measured at 7, 14, and 28 days after
ICH.
Neurobehavioral tests
Animals were subjected to neurofunctional assessments using the modified Garcia
scale, T-maze tests, and rotor rod tests. Neurobehavior tests were assessed by
an independent researcher blinded to treatment allocation. The modified Garcia
scale and Morris water maze were described previously.[2,17] Each test was repeated
three times, and an average score was taken.
Modified Garcia test
The modified Garcia test involves a 21-point sensorimotor assessment that
includes seven individual tests.[2] Each test has a score ranging from 0 to 3, with a maximum score of
21.
T-maze test
The rats were placed in the startbox of the T-maze shown in Figure 1 and allowed
to consume 2.5 ml of 25% w/v sucrose solution from a small dish at the end
of the choice alley. At the beginning of each trial, the rat was placed head
first through the entry door of the startbox, so that it could freely enter
either choice alley. A choice accuracy and time of duration was recorded by
the rat’s entry into a choice compartment. Regardless of whether the choice
was correct or incorrect, the rat was then removed and placed in its home
cage for the appropriate delay interval.[18] Each rat repeated the trial six times.
Figure 1.
The T-maze consisted of a gray wooden startbox flanked on either side
by a wooden choice chamber. The left compartment was painted white
and the right side was black. One-way doors made of clear plastic
permitted entry into the choice chambers and prevented retracing.
The lids of all chambers were made of clear plastic and the floors
of hardware cloth.
The T-maze consisted of a gray wooden startbox flanked on either side
by a wooden choice chamber. The left compartment was painted white
and the right side was black. One-way doors made of clear plastic
permitted entry into the choice chambers and prevented retracing.
The lids of all chambers were made of clear plastic and the floors
of hardware cloth.
Rotor-rod test
The rats were placed on a rotating rod with either constant rotation or a
steady acceleration; the latency to fall was recorded. In the fixed rotation
protocol, the rats were placed on a rod that accelerates and then rotates
constantly at 10 rpm. In the accelerating protocol, the rats were placed on
a rod that accelerates quickly from 0 to 5 rpm and then gradually from 5 to
20 rpm. A trial is completed when the animal falls or the time period ends.
The rats were tested for the two trials at 14 and 28 days post-surgery.
Morris water maze test
The Morris water maze test was performed to evaluate the effects of the treatment
on spatial memory and learning ability following ICH. This test was conducted as
previously described.[17] After adaptation for two consecutive days, rats were tested from 25 to
28 days after ICH.
Hemoglobin assay
The procedure was performed as previously described.[17] Drabkin’s reagent was added to 0.1 ml supernatant aliquots and allowed to
rest for 15 min at room temperature, protected from light. This reaction
converts hemoglobin to cyanomethemoglobin, which has an absorbance peak at
540 nm, and whose concentration can then be assessed by measuring the optical
density (OD) of the solution at ≈550 nm wavelength. OD was measured and recorded
at 540 nm with a spectrophotometer. These procedures yielded a linear
relationship between measured hemoglobin concentrations in perfused brain
tissues and the volume of added blood on a standard absorbance curve. To better
illustrate the levels of hemoglobin compared with the sham (hematoma is zero),
the data was showed as a ratio (the preset value of the sham was 1).[17]
Iron staining and iron contents
Iron staining and iron contents were evaluated as previously described.[2,17] Brain
sections were rinsed in distilled water and immersed in Perls’ solution for
20 min. All slides were rinsed with distilled water, then counterstained with
nuclear fast red dye for 5 min. Iron contents were assayed as previously
performed according to instructions of Iron Assay protocol.[17] Iron values were calculated using a Bio-Rad iMarkTM Microplate Absorbance
Reader. Total iron contents of the samples were acquired from the standard
curve.
Brain weight analysis
Brain sections were stained by a hematoxylin-eosin staining kit. The rats were
euthanized, then the brain was removed. After removal of the cerebellum and
brainstem, the brain was split in half along the midline and the weight of the
right and left hemispheres was recorded. The difference in weight between the
left and right hemisphere was calculated.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data is presented as mean ±SD. One-way ANOVA for multiple
comparisons with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to determine
the differences of hemoglobin levels, iron contents, and brain weight between
right/left hemisphere among all groups at each time point. Two-way ANOVA with
Bonfferoni post-test was used to assay the differences of neurological deficits.
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Mortality
All sham-operated rats survived. The total operative mortality of rats subjected
to ICH was 6.94% (n = 5). The mortality was not significantly
different among the experimental groups (Supplementary tables).
PPAR-γ/Nrf2 agonist monascin improved long-term neurological deficits
following ICH
ICH+ vehicle animals scored significantly lower than sham animals in the
neurofunctional tests performed at each time point, except for the T-maze test
duration (p < 0.05, Supplemental Figure A–G). Compared with the vehicle, PPAR-γ/Nrf2
agonist monascin led to significant improvement in neurofunctional deficits
evaluated with the modified Garcia scale, T-maze test, and rotor rod test at 14
and 28 days after ICH (p < 0.05, Supplemental Figure A–G ).Results of the Morris water maze test showed that monascin improved spatial
memory after ICH (p < 0.05, Figure 2a–d). Monascin-treated ICH rats showed
shorter routes travelled compared with vehicle animals (Figure 2a). During the first day of
testing, all rats showed a similar latency to reach the platform. In subsequent
testing, monascin-treated ICH animals showed a shorter latency to escape onto
the platform on the third and fourth day of the water maze experiments compared
with vehicle animals (Figure
2b). Monascin-treated rats demonstrated shorter swimming distances
before escaping onto the hidden platform on the second and fourth day of testing
(Figure 2c). In the
probe trial on the sixth day of testing, monascin-treated rats traveled
significantly more within the target quadrant than vehicle animals (Figure 2d). Furthermore,
no significantly different neurological test scores were found between the sham
and monascin-treated ICH rats except modified Garcia scales at 28 days after
surgery (Supplemental Figure A–G and Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Morris water maze test was applied in all groups from 25 to 28 days after
ICH (n = 6/group). (a) Visualization of the swimming
track and heat map. (b) Mean latency to escape onto the platform. (c)
Mean swimming distances before escaping onto the platform. and (d) Mean
platform searching times within the target quadrant.
*p < 0.05 versus sham,
#p < 0.05 versus ICH+vehicle,
2-way ANOVA, mean ± SD, analysis by repeated measures ANOVA.
ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage; SD,
standard deviation.
Morris water maze test was applied in all groups from 25 to 28 days after
ICH (n = 6/group). (a) Visualization of the swimming
track and heat map. (b) Mean latency to escape onto the platform. (c)
Mean swimming distances before escaping onto the platform. and (d) Mean
platform searching times within the target quadrant.
*p < 0.05 versus sham,
#p < 0.05 versus ICH+vehicle,
2-way ANOVA, mean ± SD, analysis by repeated measures ANOVA.ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage; SD,
standard deviation.
PPAR-γ/Nrf2 agonist monascin decreased hematoma volume following ICH
Monascin-treated ICH rats exhibited decreased hemoglobin levels in the
ipsilateral brain hemispheres compared with vehicle group at 7 days after
surgery (p < 0.05, Figure 3). Compared with the sham group,
the level of hemoglobin was significantly increased at 7 days and 14 days in the
ICH+ vehicle group, whereas at 7 days in monascin-treated ICH rats after surgery
(p < 0.05, Figure 3a,b), there was no significant difference
between the sham and monascin treated ICH at 14 days and 28 days after surgery;
no differences were found among the three study groups at 28 days after surgery
(Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Hemorrhage slices (a) and hemoglobin levels (b) at 7, 14, and 28 days
after ICH. To better illustrate the levels of hemoglobin compared with
the sham (hematoma is zero), data are showed as a ratio (the preset
value of the sham was 1). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey tests were
used. *p < 0.05 versus Sham,
#p < 0.05 versus
ICH+Vehicle.
ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage.
Hemorrhage slices (a) and hemoglobin levels (b) at 7, 14, and 28 days
after ICH. To better illustrate the levels of hemoglobin compared with
the sham (hematoma is zero), data are showed as a ratio (the preset
value of the sham was 1). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey tests were
used. *p < 0.05 versus Sham,
#p < 0.05 versus
ICH+Vehicle.ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage.
PPAR-γ/Nrf2 agonist monascin reduced iron deposits following ICH
Monascin-treated ICH rats exhibited lower iron contents in the ipsilateral brain
hemispheres compared with vehicle group at 7 days and 14 days after surgery
(p < 0.05, Figure 4). The vehicle group showed a
significant increase in iron contents when compared with sham at 7 days and
14 days after surgery (p < 0.05, Figure 4). There was no significant
difference between the sham and monascin-treated ICH, and no differences were
found among all the groups at 28 days after surgery
(p > 0.05, Figure 4). The results showed that iron accumulation had cleared by
4 weeks after ICH.
Figure 4.
(a) Iron staining and (b) iron contents assays at 7, 14, and 28 days
after ICH induction. *p < 0.05
versus Sham, #p < 0.05
versus ICH+Vehicle, n = 6/group,
One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test, mean ± SD.
ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage; SD,
standard deviation.
(a) Iron staining and (b) iron contents assays at 7, 14, and 28 days
after ICH induction. *p < 0.05
versus Sham, #p < 0.05
versus ICH+Vehicle, n = 6/group,
One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test, mean ± SD.ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage; SD,
standard deviation.
PPAR-γ/Nrf2 agonist monascin ameliorated hemisphere atrophy following
ICH
Monascin-treated ICH rats showed less weight differences between the two brain
hemispheres compared with the vehicle group at 28 days after surgery
(p < 0.05, Figure 5). Compared with the sham group,
the weight differences between the two brain hemispheres increased significantly
in the ICH+ vehicle group at 28 days after surgery. There was no significant
weight differences in two sides between the sham and monascin-treated ICH, no
differences were found between the sham and ICH+ vehicle group at 7 days and
14 days after surgery (p > 0.05, Figure 5).
Figure 5.
(a) Hematoxylin-eosin staining and (b) brain weight differences between
the left and right hemisphere at 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery.
*p < 0.05 versus Sham,
#p < 0.05 versus ICH+Vehicle,
n = 6/group, One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple
comparison test, mean ± SD; values were calculated by subtracting weight
of the right from the left hemisphere.
ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage; SD,
standard deviation.
(a) Hematoxylin-eosin staining and (b) brain weight differences between
the left and right hemisphere at 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery.
*p < 0.05 versus Sham,
#p < 0.05 versus ICH+Vehicle,
n = 6/group, One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple
comparison test, mean ± SD; values were calculated by subtracting weight
of the right from the left hemisphere.ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage; SD,
standard deviation.
Discussion
In this study, we made the following observations: (1) PPAR-γ/Nrf2 agonist monascin
significantly improved motor disability at 14 and 28 days after ICH, as assessed by
modified Garcia scales and rotor-rod test. (2) Monascin also improved spatial memory
and learning ability at 14 and 28 days following ICH, as evaluated by T-maze test
and Morris water maze. (3) Monascin significantly attenuated hematoma volume at
7 days and iron contents at 7 and 14 days after ICH. (4) Monascin alleviated
ipsilateral hemisphere atrophy at 28 days after ICH. These results suggest that
PPAR-γ/Nrf2 is involved in hematoma scavenging in ICH. The PPAR-γ/Nrf2 agonist
monascin prevented/improved long-term neurological deficits and complications by
facilitating hematoma clearance and iron deposits after ICH.It is well known that hematoma is a primary and vital culprit in ICH, so facilitating
hematoma absorption or clearance with non-invasive methods is crucial to prevent
early brain insults following ICH. As previously mentioned, Nrf2 and PPAR-γ play
similar roles in promoting phagocytosis and hematoma resolution following
ICH.[8,12-14]Monascin, a yellow pigment isolated from Monascus-fermented product, is produced by a
unique fermentation technology from red yeast rice in China.[15] Monascin is a natural dual activator of PPAR-γ and Nrf2.[19] Our previous study has also demonstrated that monascin exerts neuroprotective
roles by facilitating hematoma clearance through the haptoglobin-hemoglobin-CD163
pathway in ICH.[9,16] But no data were available on the long-term efficacy of
monascin in ICH. We studied the long-term roles of monascin and described its
beneficial neurobehavioral effects in ICH. It is well known that the hematoma
degradation products hemoglobin, heme, and iron result in secondary insults after
ICH.[1,2,9,17] In the present study, we found
that monascin prevented or ameliorated encephalatrophy in the late stage by reducing
hemoglobin levels and iron deposits induced by ICH, then improved motor disability,
spatial memory, and learning ability following ICH.In conclusion, our study highlights the long-term effects of monascin, a dual agonist
of PPAR-γ and Nrf2, in the setting of experimental rat ICH. Monascin facilitates
hematoma and iron scavenging and prevents or alleviates encephalatrophy induced by
ICH, which results in beneficial effects of long-term outcomes after ICH. The
efficacy of monascin in clinical practice should be addressed in future studies.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplementary_materials for Long-term outcomes of monascin
– a novel dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ/nuclear
factor-erythroid 2 related factor-2 agonist in experimental intracerebral
hemorrhage by Pengcheng Fu, Jiachen Liu, Qinqin Bai, Xingang Sun, Zhenjia Yao,
Lirong Liu, Cuimei Wu and Gaiqing Wang in Therapeutic Advances in Neurological
Disorders
Authors: A David Mendelow; Barbara A Gregson; Elise N Rowan; Gordon D Murray; Anil Gholkar; Patrick M Mitchell Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 79.321