| Literature DB >> 32477211 |
Shutao Ma1, Yuhuai Huang1, Yankun Ma1.
Abstract
Previous studies have found that childhood maltreatment is an important risk predictor of adolescent mobile phone addiction (MPA). However, little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this association. Grounded in the Basic Psychological Needs Theory and the organism-environment interaction model, this study examined the mediating effect of loneliness and the moderating effect of self-control in the relationship between childhood maltreatment and adolescent MPA. A total of 981 Chinese adolescents (Mage = 13.68 years, SD = 0.92) completed measures regarding childhood maltreatment, MPA, loneliness, and self-control. After controlling for participants' demographic variables, loneliness partially mediated the relation between childhood maltreatment and adolescent MPA and this indirect path was moderated by self-control. Specifically, the effect of loneliness on MPA was stronger for adolescents with lower self-control than for those with higher self-control. Our research provides additional evidence for the negative association between childhood maltreatment and MPA.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; childhood maltreatment; loneliness; mobile phone addiction (MPA); self-control
Year: 2020 PMID: 32477211 PMCID: PMC7235189 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1A moderated mediation model of childhood maltreatment, loneliness, self-control, and adolescent mobile phone addiction.
Means, standard deviations, and correlations of main study variables.
| Variables | Mean | Standard deviation | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 1. Childhood maltreatment | 2.16 | 0.41 | 1.00 | |||
| 2. Self-control | 2.49 | 0.58 | –0.13** | 1.00 | ||
| 3. Loneliness | 2.51 | 0.44 | 0.52** | –0.13** | 1.00 | |
| 4. Mobile phone addiction | 2.05 | 0.57 | 0.38** | –0.34** | 0.33** | 1.00 |
Mediation effect of childhood maltreatment on MPA.
| Predictors | Model 1 (criterion: MPA) | Model 2 (criterion: loneliness) | Model 3 (criterion: MPA) | ||||||
| Childhood maltreatment | 0.49 | 0.04 | 12.40*** | 0.53 | 0.03 | 18.07*** | 0.35 | 0.02 | 7.90*** |
| Loneliness | 0.24 | 0.05 | 5.72*** | ||||||
| Gender | 0.07 | 0.03 | 2.07* | 0.06 | 0.02 | 2.16* | 0.05 | 0.032 | 1.66 |
| Age | 0.04 | 0.02 | 2.31* | –0.02 | 0.01 | –0.68 | 0.04 | 0.027 | 2.53* |
| 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.27 | |||||||
| 45.22*** | 60.83*** | 40.393*** | |||||||
Moderated mediation effects of childhood maltreatment on Mobile Phone Addiction (MPA).
| Model 1 (criterion: MPA) | Model 2 (criterion: loneliness) | Model 3 (criterion: MPA) | |||||||
| Childhood maltreatment X | 0.49 | 0.04 | 12.40∗∗∗ | 0.53 | 0.03 | 18.07∗∗∗ | 0.35 | 0.02 | 7.90∗∗∗ |
| Self-control MO | –0.30 | 0.03 | –10.89∗∗∗ | –0.03 | 0.02 | –1.28 | –0.30 | 0.05 | –10.99∗∗∗ |
| X × MO | –0.03 | 0.04 | –0.79 | –0.04 | 0.03 | –1.38 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 1.24 |
| Loneliness ME | 0.24 | 0.05 | 5.72∗∗∗ | ||||||
| ME × MO | –0.12 | 0.04 | −2.17∗ | ||||||
| Gender | 0.07 | 0.03 | 2.07∗ | 0.06 | 0.02 | 2.16∗ | 0.05 | 0.03 | 1.66 |
| Age | 0.04 | 0.02 | 2.31∗ | –0.02 | 0.01 | –0.68 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 2.53∗ |
| 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.27 | |||||||
| 45.22∗∗∗ | 60.83∗∗∗ | 40.39∗∗∗ | |||||||
FIGURE 2Conditional effect of mobile phone addiction as a function of loneliness and self-control. Functions are graphed for two levels of self-control: 1 standard deviation above the mean and 1 standard deviation below the mean.