James Dorman1,2, Lakshmi Warrior1,2, Vishal Pandya3, Ying Sun4, Jacob Ninan5, William Trick6, Helen Zhang7, Bichun Ouyang2. 1. Neurology. 2. Neurological Sciences, Rush University. 3. Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin. 4. UPMC Department of Neurology. 5. Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health Systems. 6. Internal Medicine, Cook County Health and Hospital System. 7. Collaborative Research Unit, Cook County Health and Hospitals System.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging data, and treatment outcomes for neurosarcoidosis in an urban safety net hospital. METHODS: The research database of Cook County Health and Hospitals system was queried for all cases of sarcoidosis from 2006 to 2013. These cases plus those identified through a survey of neurology faculty were reviewed and flagged if suspected to be neurosarcoidosis. Data were extracted in a standardized fashion, upon review by two experienced neurologists; patients were classified as definite, probable or possible neurosarcoidosis. Disagreements on classification were resolved by consensus conference. RESULTS: 1706 cases of sarcoidosis were identified, with 82 (4.8%) classified as neurosarcoidosis. The cohort was predominantly African American (89%). Six were classified as definite, 34 as probable, and 42 as possible neurosarcoidosis. Neurosarcoidosis was the presenting symptom of sarcoidosis in 74% of cases. The most common presenting phenotype was myelopathy (21.7%), followed by optic nerve/chiasm involvement (16.0%) and epilepsy (11.3%). The facial nerve was involved in only 2% of cases. Chest x-ray showed abnormalities of sarcoidosis in 43.3% of cases, while chest CT did so in 78.6%. Corticosteroids were the initial treatment in 91% of cases, and outcomes were good in 53% of cases. CONCLUSION: Neurosarcoidosis remains a challenging diagnosis with the majority of patients without a previous diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis. Chest imaging was supportive of the diagnosis in a majority of patients. Our cohort differs from others in the literature due to a low prevalence of facial nerve involvement. Prospective registry studies are needed. Copyright:
OBJECTIVE: To characterize clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging data, and treatment outcomes for neurosarcoidosis in an urban safety net hospital. METHODS: The research database of Cook County Health and Hospitals system was queried for all cases of sarcoidosis from 2006 to 2013. These cases plus those identified through a survey of neurology faculty were reviewed and flagged if suspected to be neurosarcoidosis. Data were extracted in a standardized fashion, upon review by two experienced neurologists; patients were classified as definite, probable or possible neurosarcoidosis. Disagreements on classification were resolved by consensus conference. RESULTS: 1706 cases of sarcoidosis were identified, with 82 (4.8%) classified as neurosarcoidosis. The cohort was predominantly African American (89%). Six were classified as definite, 34 as probable, and 42 as possible neurosarcoidosis. Neurosarcoidosis was the presenting symptom of sarcoidosis in 74% of cases. The most common presenting phenotype was myelopathy (21.7%), followed by optic nerve/chiasm involvement (16.0%) and epilepsy (11.3%). The facial nerve was involved in only 2% of cases. Chest x-ray showed abnormalities of sarcoidosis in 43.3% of cases, while chest CT did so in 78.6%. Corticosteroids were the initial treatment in 91% of cases, and outcomes were good in 53% of cases. CONCLUSION: Neurosarcoidosis remains a challenging diagnosis with the majority of patients without a previous diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis. Chest imaging was supportive of the diagnosis in a majority of patients. Our cohort differs from others in the literature due to a low prevalence of facial nerve involvement. Prospective registry studies are needed. Copyright:
Authors: Mary Elizabeth Kreider; Jason D Christie; Bruce Thompson; Lee Newman; Cecile Rose; Juliana Barnard; Eddy Bresnitz; Marc A Judson; Daniel T Lackland; Milton D Rossman Journal: Chest Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jeffrey M Gelfand; Michael J Bradshaw; Barney J Stern; David B Clifford; Yunxia Wang; Tracey A Cho; Laura L Koth; Stephen L Hauser; Jason Dierkhising; NgocHanh Vu; Subramaniam Sriram; Harold Moses; Francesca Bagnato; Jeffrey A Kaufmann; Deidre J Ammah; Tsion H Yohannes; Mark J Hamblin; Nagagopal Venna; Ari J Green; Siddharama Pawate Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J P Zajicek; N J Scolding; O Foster; M Rovaris; J Evanson; I F Moseley; J W Scadding; E J Thompson; V Chamoun; D H Miller; W I McDonald; D Mitchell Journal: QJM Date: 1999-02
Authors: Tatjana Blazin; Dhruvil Prajapati; Linha Lina M Mohammed; Meera Dhavale; Mohamed K Abdelaal; A B M Nasibul Alam; Natalia P Ballestas; Jihan A Mostafa Journal: Cureus Date: 2020-11-14