Literature DB >> 32476768

Diagnostic Value of Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in Adnexal Masses.

Vijay Kumar1, Shiv Rajan1, Sameer Gupta1, Naseem Akhtar1, Sonali Sharma2, Punnet Sinha1, Sanjeev Misra3, Arun Chaturvedi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiating malignancy from benign diseases is the key to successful management of adnexal masses. Risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) has been used for this purpose. We have prospectively studied the diagnostic value of ROMA in patients presented with adnexal masses.
METHODS: We prospective calculated ROMA values prior to surgery for adnexal masses. The risk calculated was then correlated with the histological findings, and results were analyzed according to menopausal status. ROMA cutoff value was determined using ROC curve, and sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. Statistics were performed on SPSS software (version 20.0).
RESULTS: There were 94 patients with adnexal masses included in the study, 65 (69.1%) had epithelial ovarian cancer and 29 (30.9%) were diagnosed benign on histopathology. In both pre- and postmenopausal patients, ROMA values were significantly higher in patients with malignancy compared to those with benign disease (p < 0.05). ROMA score was of a significant diagnostic value in both premenopausal (AUC = 0.914, Z = 10.81, p < 0.001) and postmenopausal patients (AUC = 0.975, Z = 21.51, p < 0.001). In premenopausal females, ROMA > 13.3% was able to discriminate malignant from benign patients with 97.06% sensitivity and 85.00% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 91.7% and 94.4%. Similarly, in postmenopausal females, ROMA value of > 76% achieved 87.10% sensitivity and 100.00% specificity in discriminating malignant from benign patients with 100% positive and 69.2% negative predictive value. The overall accuracy of ROMA in pre- and postmenopausal patients was 87.0% and 85%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ROMA is a useful and accurate test for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign ovarian masses. Further studies are needed to compare performance of ROMA with the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), CA 125 and HE4. Such comparative studies will be helpful to the clinician in deciding the best diagnostic tool for women with adnexal masses. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adnexal mass; CA 125; HE4; ROMA

Year:  2019        PMID: 32476768      PMCID: PMC7239964          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-019-01295-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  16 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of adnexal masses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management.

Authors:  Elisabetta Bandiera; Chiara Romani; Claudia Specchia; Laura Zanotti; Claudio Galli; Giuseppina Ruggeri; Germana Tognon; Eliana Bignotti; Renata A Tassi; Franco Odicino; Luigi Caimi; Enrico Sartori; Alessandro D Santin; Sergio Pecorelli; Antonella Ravaggi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Evaluation of the accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 in combination with CA125 for detecting ovarian cancer: a prospective case-control study in a Korean population.

Authors:  Yong Man Kim; Dong Hee Whang; Joonseok Park; Sung Hoon Kim; Shin Wha Lee; Hyun Ah Park; Mina Ha; Kyung-Hwa Choi
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andreas du Bois; Justine Rochon; Jacobus Pfisterer; William J Hoskins
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; D Scott McMeekin; Amy K Brown; Paul DiSilvestro; M Craig Miller; W Jeffrey Allard; Walter Gajewski; Robert Kurman; Robert C Bast; Steven J Skates
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The use of HE4 in the prediction of ovarian cancer in Asian women with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Karen K L Chan; Chi-An Chen; Joo-Hyun Nam; Kazunori Ochiai; Sarikapan Wilailak; Aw-Tar Choon; Subathra Sabaratnam; Sudarshan Hebbar; Jaganathan Sickan; Beth A Schodin; Walfrido W Sumpaico
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Comparison of HE4, CA125 and ROMA algorithm in women with a pelvic mass: correlation with pathological outcome.

Authors:  M T Sandri; F Bottari; D Franchi; S Boveri; M Candiani; S Ronzoni; M Peiretti; D Radice; R Passerini; M Sideri
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Frederick R Ueland; Rachel W Miller; Jessalyn M Ubellacker; Christopher P DeSimone; Jeffrey Elder; John Hoff; Lauren Baldwin; Richard J Kryscio; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm.

Authors:  T Van Gorp; I Cadron; E Despierre; A Daemen; K Leunen; F Amant; D Timmerman; B De Moor; I Vergote
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Saundra S Buys; Edward Partridge; Amanda Black; Christine C Johnson; Lois Lamerato; Claudine Isaacs; Douglas J Reding; Robert T Greenlee; Lance A Yokochi; Bruce Kessel; E David Crawford; Timothy R Church; Gerald L Andriole; Joel L Weissfeld; Mona N Fouad; David Chia; Barbara O'Brien; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Patricia Hartge; Paul F Pinsky; Claire S Zhu; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; Jian-Lun Xu; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 157.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.