Literature DB >> 32476615

Comparison of anticoagulant rodenticide concentrations in liver and feces from apparently healthy red foxes.

Kristin O Seljetun1,2,3,4,5, Morten Sandvik1,2,3,4,5, Vigdis Vindenes1,2,3,4,5, Elin Eliassen1,2,3,4,5, Elisabeth L Øiestad1,2,3,4,5, Knut Madslien1,2,3,4,5, Lars Moe1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Exposure of wildlife and domestic animals to anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) is a worldwide concern, but few methods exist to determine residue levels in live animals. Traditional liver detection methods preclude determining exposure in live wildlife. To determine the value of assessing AR exposure by fecal analysis, we compared fecal and liver residues of ARs in the same animals. We collected liver and fecal samples from 40 apparently healthy red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) potentially exposed to ARs, and quantified brodifacoum, bromadiolone, coumatetralyl, difenacoum, difethialone, and flocoumafen residues by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Residues of ARs were detected in 53% of the fecal samples and 83% of the liver samples. We found good concordance between AR residues in feces and liver for coumatetralyl, difenacoum, and difethialone. Bromadiolone occurred in significantly greater frequency in livers compared to feces, but no significant difference in concentration between feces and liver in individual foxes could be detected. Brodifacoum displayed a significant difference in concentration and occurrence of positive samples between liver and feces. Our findings demonstrate that fecal analysis of ARs provides a feasible and valuable non-lethal means of determine AR exposure in live wildlife.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulant rodenticides; non-target animals; secondary exposure; wildlife.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32476615      PMCID: PMC7438647          DOI: 10.1177/1040638720927365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  14 in total

1.  Does small mammal prey guild affect the exposure of predators to anticoagulant rodenticides?

Authors:  D G Tosh; R A McDonald; S Bearhop; N R Lllewellyn; S Fee; E A Sharp; E A Barnett; R F Shore
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Second generation anticoagulant rodenticides in predatory birds: Probabilistic characterisation of toxic liver concentrations and implications for predatory bird populations in Canada.

Authors:  Philippe J Thomas; Pierre Mineau; Richard F Shore; Louise Champoux; Pamela A Martin; Laurie K Wilson; Guy Fitzgerald; John E Elliott
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Exposure of stone marten (Martes foina) and polecat (Mustela putorius) to anticoagulant rodenticides: Effects of regulatory restrictions of rodenticide use.

Authors:  Morten Elmeros; Pia Lassen; Rossana Bossi; Christopher J Topping
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Liver and fecal samples suggest differential exposure of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) to trans- and cis-bromadiolone in areas from France treated with plant protection products.

Authors:  Isabelle Fourel; Mickaël Sage; Etienne Benoit; Virginie Lattard
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Core-shell LC-MS/MS method for quantification of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides diastereoisomers in rat liver in relationship with exposure of wild rats.

Authors:  Isabelle Fourel; Marlène Damin-Pernik; Etienne Benoit; Virginie Lattard
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Determination of bromadiolone residues in fox faeces by LC/ESI-MS in relationship with toxicological data and clinical signs after repeated exposure.

Authors:  Mickaël Sage; Isabelle Fourel; Michaël Cœurdassier; Jacques Barrat; Philippe Berny; Patrick Giraudoux
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Differential expression of cytochrome P450 genes between bromadiolone-resistant and anticoagulant-susceptible Norway rats: a possible role for pharmacokinetics in bromadiolone resistance.

Authors:  Mette Dk Markussen; Ann-Charlotte Heiberg; Merete Fredholm; Michael Kristensen
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.845

8.  Case studies on second-generation anticoagulant rodenticide toxicities in nontarget species.

Authors:  M D DuVall; M J Murphy; A C Ray; J C Reagor
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.279

9.  Pharmacokinetics of eight anticoagulant rodenticides in mice after single oral administration.

Authors:  V Vandenbroucke; A Bousquet-Melou; P De Backer; S Croubels
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.786

10.  Quantitative method for analysis of six anticoagulant rodenticides in faeces, applied in a case with repeated samples from a dog.

Authors:  Kristin Opdal Seljetun; Elin Eliassen; Ritva Karinen; Lars Moe; Vigdis Vindenes
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  2 in total

1.  Asymptomatic Anticoagulant Rodenticide Exposure in Dogs and Cats-A French and Belgian Rural and Urban Areas Study.

Authors:  Tarek Mahjoub; Emilie Krafft; Léa Garnier; Amélie Mignard; Christophe Hugnet; Sébastien Lefebvre; Isabelle Fourel; Etienne Benoit; Virginie Lattard
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  Determination of anticoagulant rodenticides in faeces of exposed dogs and in a healthy dog population.

Authors:  Kristin Opdal Seljetun; Vigdis Vindenes; Elisabeth Leere Øiestad; Gerd-Wenche Brochmann; Elin Eliassen; Lars Moe
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.695

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.