Literature DB >> 32476309

Ultrasound and clinical findings in the metacarpophalangeal joint assessment of show jumping horses in training.

Ana Lúcia M Yamada1, Marcelo Pinheiro2, Marília F Marsiglia3, Stefano Carlo F Hagen3, Raquel Yvonne A Baccarin4, Luís Cláudio L C da Silva3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical exercise is known to cause significant joint changes. Thus, monitoring joint behavior of athletic horses is essential in early disorders recognition, allowing the proper management.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the morphological patterns, physical examination characteristics and ultrasound findings of show jumping horses in training and to establish a score-based examination model for physical and ultrasound follow-ups of metacarpophalangeal joint changes in these animals.
METHODS: A total of 52 metacarpophalangeal joints from 26 horses who were initially in the taming stage were evaluated, and the horses' athletic progression was monitored. The horses were evaluated by a physical examination and by B-mode and Doppler-mode ultrasound examinations, starting at time zero (T0), which occurred concomitantly with the beginning of training, and every 3 months thereafter for a follow-up period of 18 months.
RESULTS: The standardized examination model revealed an increase in the maximum joint flexion angles and higher scores on the physical and ultrasound examinations after scoring was performed by predefined assessment tools, especially between 3 and 6 months of evaluation, which was immediately after the horses started more intense training. The lameness score and the ultrasound examination score were slightly higher at the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed results were probably caused by the implementation of a training regimen and joint adaptation to physical conditioning. The joints most likely undergo a pre-osteoarthritic period due to work overload, which can manifest in a consistent or adaptive manner, as observed during this study. Thus, continuous monitoring of young athlete horses by physical and ultrasound examinations that can be scored is essential.
© 2020 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Equine; jumping horse; lameness; metacarpophalangeal joint; osteoarthritis; ultrasound imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 32476309      PMCID: PMC7263911          DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Sci        ISSN: 1229-845X            Impact factor:   1.672


INTRODUCTION

Among jumping horses, especially those that are trained for competitions, there is a high incidence of orthopedic injuries, including joint injuries. This high incidence of injuries can be explained by the high performance and the intense and long training times required for jumping horses involved in competitions [12]. Moreover, the repetitive trauma and impact resulting from the execution of jumping movements overload the distal structures of the thoracic limbs, and the metacarpophalangeal joints, flexor tendons and hooves are the areas that are most affected by injuries [2]. The metacarpophalangeal joint, which is commonly called the fetlock, is constantly subjected to maximum exertion, which causes a large amount of biomechanical stress during locomotion, resulting in frequent injury to the soft tissue and articular surface [34]. Therefore, horses who perform sports activities that overload the metacarpophalangeal joint are at risk for the development of osteoarthritis and require periodic follow-ups, preferably follow-ups that involve imaging examinations and rigorous physical assessments, for the early detection of disorders [56]. The early stages of osteoarthritis, including pre-osteoarthritis, can manifest even in inexperienced animals, especially after a phase of sports conditioning adaptation or after periods of training [78]. Both pre-osteoarthritis and adaptive changes can occur without obvious clinical signs [8910]. Most athletes can adjust to exercise regimens or increases in exercise intensity. However, the articular cartilage seems unable to completely recover from constant trauma resulting from exercise and can enter an inflammatory and degenerative cycle that culminates in clinical and progressive presentations of the disease [81112]. Therefore, a combination of diagnostic tools is important for detecting and following up early changes [913]. Furthermore, diagnostic tools and evaluation protocols need to be standardized and validated, preferably through noninvasive and inexpensive methods [1415]. Serial physical and imaging examinations can identify joint changes or injuries in the early stages, enabling a better understanding of the pathogenesis, characterizing the initial presentation and the progression of diseases such as osteoarthritis, and allowing early therapeutic intervention [691016]. Ultrasound is a tool that is important for assessing various segments of the metacarpophalangeal joint and is essential for detecting changes and providing diagnostic conclusions [3417]. Recent technological advancements and the proximity of the metacarpophalangeal joint to the surface allow detailed images of soft tissues to be obtained [18] and early inflammatory changes, bone injuries and irregularities, and the structure and alignment of tendons and ligaments to be visualized [192021]. Thus, an ultrasound study of the metacarpophalangeal joint in horses who underwent show jumping training was performed to identify morphological patterns, relevant variables, and other ultrasound findings. Furthermore, the ultrasound examination was combined with a detailed physical examination to monitor the behavior of this joint in horses undergoing athletic progression. Finally, the present study proposes a score-based examination model that incorporates both physical and ultrasound monitoring results of the metacarpophalangeal joint and indicates the consequences of high-performance exercise adaptation and practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science at the University of São Paulo under protocol number 8840030417. This study evaluated 52 metacarpophalangeal joints from both thoracic limbs of 26 female and male show jumping horses who were between 3 and 4 years of age and weighed between 450 and 700 kg. Initially, the horses did not present with any type of musculoskeletal condition and did not previously show metacarpophalangeal joint changes or diseases. Before the study began, to determine the experimental group, all possible entrants were submitted to a rigorous physical examination, radiographic examination (5 projections were performed: lateromedial, dorsopalmar, oblique, and lateral-flexed) and ultrasound screening. The horses did not show any underlying diseases. Only horses without injuries on the radiographic and ultrasonographic examinations and without clinical disorders of the metacarpophalangeal joint were included in the study. The horses were included in the study when they were at the beginning stage of a training program for jumping competitions, and their athletic progression was monitored. During the follow-up period, the training phases, the type and duration of the exercises, and the physical condition of the animals were standardized (as much as possible) to better study the response of a group of young animals to physical exercise and assess the joint conditions over the course of athletic progression. Thus, all joints underwent a detailed physical examination and an ultrasound examination at the time of inclusion in the study, defined as time point zero (T0), and every 3 months thereafter, for a total follow-up time of 1 and a half years and a total of 7 evaluation time points (T0–T6). At the end of the study (after 18 months/T6), the horses were between 4.5 and 5.5 years old and were frequently participating in show jumping events.

Physical examination

The physical examination was performed at T0 and every 3 months thereafter for 1.5 years (T0–T6) for all 52 joints. The physical examination results were scored using a scale ranging from 0 to 21 points, with was modified from a previous score-based examination protocol [15], as described in Table 1. For the items “maximum flexion angle decrease” and “joint perimeter increase,” the differences between the value of the parameter obtained at T0 and the values obtained at the following time points (T1 to T6) were scored. The parameter values at T0 were considered the baseline values from which the differences between the evaluations were calculated. For the items “lameness,” “response to flexion test” and “changes on local palpation,” the changes observed separately at each time point were scored.
Table 1

Score-based physical examination protocol

VariablesCategoriesScore
Lameness (AAEP)00
11
22
33
44
55
Response to the flexion testNegative0
Positive + 1 degree1
Positive + 2 degrees2
Positive + 3 degrees3
Limb functional impotence4
Decrease in maximum flexion angle (in degrees)≤ to 5°0
6° to 10°1
11° to 15°2
16° to 20°3
≥ to 20°4
Increase in joint perimeter (in cm)≤ 0.5 cm0
0.6 to 2.0 cm1
2.1 to 4.0 cm2
4.1 to 6.0 cm3
≥ 6.1 cm4
Changes upon local palpationNormal0
Mild reaction1
Moderate discomfort and/or mild change in mobility2
Moderate discomfort and/or moderate change in mobility3
Significant discomfort and/or abnormalities of mobility, crepitation4
Total (final sum)21

Physical examination protocol used a scale ranging from 0 to 21 points (final sum) and considered the lameness examination (0 to 5 points according to the AAEP score [22]), response to the flexion test (score after the forced flexion test, AAEP score), decrease in the maximum flexion angle (metacarpophalangeal joint angle measurement, based on T0), increase in the joint perimeter (based on T0) and changes upon local palpation.

AAEP, American Association of Equine Practitioners.

Physical examination protocol used a scale ranging from 0 to 21 points (final sum) and considered the lameness examination (0 to 5 points according to the AAEP score [22]), response to the flexion test (score after the forced flexion test, AAEP score), decrease in the maximum flexion angle (metacarpophalangeal joint angle measurement, based on T0), increase in the joint perimeter (based on T0) and changes upon local palpation. AAEP, American Association of Equine Practitioners. In the lameness examination, both thoracic limbs were evaluated and scored according to the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) scale, which ranges from 0 to 5 [22]. This examination was supplemented by a complementary classification, which provided a score from 0 to 10 [23]; the complementary evaluation was necessary because horses can have a tendency to show very discrete degrees of lameness. The joints were subjected to forced flexion tests for 1 min, followed by trotting. If there was exacerbation of lameness following the flexion test, the level of lameness was scored again (AAEP score). The joint angle was measured in degrees with a goniometer, and the examined joint was flexed to the physical limit or to the demonstration of pain sensitivity. Likewise, during the physical examination, the presence of synovial effusion was determined by digital palpation and the consequent degree of joint distension, measured as the joint perimeter using a tape measure. The joints were also palpated and examined for the presence of pain, crepitation and abnormal joint mobility.

Ultrasound examination

The 52 metacarpophalangeal joints included in the study were evaluated by ultrasound (6 to 18 MHz linear transducer, MyLab30 Vet ultrasound machine; Esaote, Italy) in B mode and Doppler mode, performed at T0 and every 3 months thereafter for one and a half years (T0–T6). The ultrasound examination was always performed by the same evaluator, who had the experience needed to conduct the study. In this evaluation, all articular surfaces were evaluated in both the longitudinal and transverse planes, and the joint was supported and flexed. The ultrasound images were assigned scores ranging from 0 to 38 points [15], as described in Table 2. The following items were evaluated: the appearance and amount of synovial fluid; thickness and insertion of the joint capsule; appearance and vascularization of the capsule and synovial membrane; appearance and thickness of the synovial plica; appearance of the articular and periarticular ligaments (collateral ligaments, suspensory ligaments, and oblique sesamoidean ligaments); thickness and appearance of the chondral surface; appearance and regularity of the subchondral bone; and presence of osteophytes and enthesophytes. The structures of the metacarpophalangeal joint were measured at one time, at T0 only, so that the standard morphological values in healthy horses could be obtained.
Table 2

Classification and scoring of each evaluated parameter in the ultrasound examination using a scale ranging from 0 to 38 points (final sum)

VariablesCategoriesScore
Synovial fluid appearanceNormal0
Anechoic1
Predominantly anechoic2
Predominantly heterogeneous3
Heterogeneous with hyperechoic floating foci/debris4
Synovial fluid amountNormal0
Increased +1
Increased ++2
Increased +++3
Increased ++++4
Joint capsule thicknessNormal0
Increased by 20% in localized areas1
Increase2
Increase by more than 20%3
Joint capsule appearanceNormal0
Localized hypoechogenic area1
Hypoechogenic areas with hyperechogenic foci2
Joint capsule insertionSmooth0
Discretely irregular1
Irregular2
Severe irregularity3
Appearance of periarticular ligamentsNormal0
Heterogeneous and/or hypoechogenic areas1
Heterogeneous and/or hyperechogenic areas2
Massive injury or rupture3
Origin and insertion of articular/periarticular ligamentsNormal0
Presence of irregularities1
Discrete bone proliferation2
Severe bone proliferation3
Severe bone proliferation and/or fragments4
Synovial vascularizationNormal0
Slightly increased vascularization1
Increased vascularization2
Joint cartilage thickness and appearanceWell-defined, continuous chondral line, smooth and easily identifiable0
Difficult-to-identify chondral line with 50% of surface preserved1
Difficult-to-identify chondral line, discontinuous and rough2
No identification of the line with presence of fragments3
Absence of the line with diffuse subchondral alteration4
Subchondral surface appearanceSmooth0
Irregular1
Areas of depression2
Synovial plica appearanceNormal0
Predominantly hyperechogenic1
Hyperechogenic calcification sites2
Synovial plica sizeNormal0
Increased up to 50%1
Increased by more than 50%2
Presence of subchondral osteophytesSmooth joint margin0
Rough joint margin1
Presence of osteophytes2
Evident osteophytes or fragments3
Total (final sum)38

Statistical analysis

The analyses were performed in SPSS 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0; IBM Corp., USA) [24]. A descriptive statistical analysis of the data was first performed by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the scores and angles at each time point. The Shapiro-Wilk test was then used to test the normality of the data distributions and based on these results (Shapiro-Wilk p values were < 0.001 for the angles and scores), nonparametric tests were used for the analyses. The differences between the time points were assessed using the Friedman test, followed by the Wilcoxon test. The differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

At the beginning of this study, there were 26 horses of the Brazilian Sport Horse breed who were stabled in horse farms and training centers in São Paulo, Brazil. Some of the youngest horses had been stabled recently. At T0, the horses were beginning a dressage and show jumping training program that included obstacles on a track, but they had not yet participated in a competition. At the end of the study (at T6), most animals had completed intense training and were participating regularly in show jumping events. Fig. 1 summarizes the physical examination classifications based on the joint scores (mean of the sum, Table 1). The baseline values for the study were a flexion angle = 140° and joint perimeter = 28.5 cm (mean of animals at T0). At T1, only 10 animals showed mild pain sensitivity upon palpation of the joint, with a mild degree of effusion. A significant difference was found (p < 0.05) between the mean of the sum of the scores obtained at T0 and the mean of the sum of scores obtained at other time points. There was also a significant difference in the mean sum of the scores between T1 and T2. After T2, the scores remained more consistent, with no significant differences. Among the time points, T2 showed the highest sum score, and the maximum value corresponding to one of the joints reached 8 points out of the overall total of 21 points. T0 and T1 were the time points with the lowest scores, with a minimum of zero points. The physical examination parameter that showed the highest score per animal was the maximum flexion angle, where the highest angle was 160° and the lowest was 124°. The joint perimeter and changes upon palpation did not show significant differences between the analyzed times.
Fig. 1

Mean values observed after classification of the physical examination (score-based physical examination protocol, classified using scores ranging from 0 to 21 points – Table 1) at all time points (T0–T6).

*There was a significant difference (p < 0,05) between T0 and the other time points and between T1 and T2.

Mean values observed after classification of the physical examination (score-based physical examination protocol, classified using scores ranging from 0 to 21 points – Table 1) at all time points (T0–T6).

*There was a significant difference (p < 0,05) between T0 and the other time points and between T1 and T2. The mean maximum flexion angles observed are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2. The joint angle results followed the same statistical trend as the sum of the scores observed after the physical examination, with higher values mainly occurring after T2 and more consistent values occurring after thereafter. The joints examined showed discrete degrees of lameness, and the highest score on the AAEP scale was 2. In the complementary classification ranging from 0 to 10, the highest score was 3, and forced flexion increased the degree of lameness by a maximum of 2 points. The lameness scores were higher at the end of the study, after T5. Fig. 3 shows the mean lameness values over time.
Table 3

Measured value of maximum flexion angles measurement observed at all time points (T0–T6)

Time pointsAngle
Mean ± SDMedianPercentile 25%–75%
T0139.7 ± 8.2a140a134–146
T1142.7 ± 8.3b144b137–149
T2148.5 ± 5.3c150c146–151
T3146.8 ± 4.3de148de144–149
T4147.9 ± 3.9cd147cd145–150
T5146.3 ± 3.3e147e144–149
T6144.2 ± 3.9b144b142–148
p value*< 0.001< 0.001

*p value of the Friedman test (nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measures); different letters represent significant differences between time points.

Fig. 2

Comparison of the median flexion angle values. The boxes represent the variability of the data. The lower end of the box corresponds to the value of 25% of the sample, the upper end corresponds to 75% of the sample, and the centerline is the median (50% of the samples).

º indicates the presence of outliers.

Fig. 3

Mean of the lameness scores for the AAEP scores (p = 0.331), 0–10 complementary score (p = 0.124), and after forced flexion (Flex) (p = 0.321) during the study period (T0– T6). There was no statistical difference in the evaluated scores.AAEP, American Association of Equine Practitioners.

*p value of the Friedman test (nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measures); different letters represent significant differences between time points.

Comparison of the median flexion angle values. The boxes represent the variability of the data. The lower end of the box corresponds to the value of 25% of the sample, the upper end corresponds to 75% of the sample, and the centerline is the median (50% of the samples).

º indicates the presence of outliers. The most commonly observed ultrasound changes are shown in Fig. 4 and are summarized as follows: osteochondral irregularities, increased and heterogeneous plica, increased thickness of the joint capsule, synovitis with increased vascularization observed by Doppler ultrasound, and collateral ligament abnormalities. The T0 measurements that were obtained in the ultrasound examination of the metacarpophalangeal structures for use as standard reference values in healthy animals are described in Table 4. In the multiple comparisons, for the sum of the ultrasound injury scores, as previously described (mean of the sum, Table 2), the scores were significantly lower at T0 than at all other time points, with the exception of T2. However, from T1 onward, there were no significant differences, as shown in Table 5 and Fig. 5.
Fig. 4

Ultrasound images showing the primary observed changes: osteochondral irregularities in the articular surface of the main metacarpal bone (arrows in A and B); articular capsule heterogeneity (C); increased and heterogeneous plica (arrows in D and E) and synovitis and increased vascularization (F).

Table 4

Values of the morphological patterns observed in the T0 ultrasound examination

VariablesMean (cm)SD
CP M0.6460.135
CP L0.5900.108
CP IN MT0.3420.068
CP IN PH0.2660.073
CA TK M0.1040.025
CA TK L0.0800.020
CA TK CR0.1150.040
CL L PO0.4080.069
CL L PI0.4640.068
CL M PO0.4300.077
CL M PI0.4280.073
PLICA0.3080.067
ANNULAR0.1920.034
FSL L1.4130.347
FSL M1.5840.359

Thickness of the joint capsule in the transverse plane at the medial/lateral third metacarpal bone (CP M/CP L); thickness of the joint capsule insertion in the transverse plane in the third metacarpal bone (CP IN MT) and in the transverse place in the first phalanx (CP IN PH); thickness of the joint cartilage in the transverse plane in the medial/lateral condyles/sagittal crest (CA TK M/CA TK L/CA TK CR); cross-sectional area of the fetlock suspensory ligament medial/lateral branches (FSL M/FSL L); thickness in the longitudinal plane of the medial/lateral collateral ligaments (CL M/CL L) at origin (PO) and insertion (PI); plica thickness (PLICA); and annular ligament thickness (ANNULAR).

Table 5

Measured value of values observed in the ultrasound exam (ultrasound examination using scores ranging from 0 to 38 points – Table 2) at all time points (T0–T6)

Time pointsScore
Mean ± SDMedianPercentile 25–75%
T02.1 ± 1.5a2a1–3
T13.3 ± 2.1b3b2–5
T23.1 ± 2.7ab2ab1–5
T33.4 ± 2.2b3b2–4
T43.6 ± 2.8b3b1–6
T54.1 ± 2.3b4b2–5
T64.4 ± 2.1b5b3–6
p value*< 0.001< 0.001

*p value of the Friedman test (nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measures); different letters represent significant differences between time points.

Fig. 5

Median values observed after classification of the ultrasound exam (ultrasound examination using scores ranging from 0 to 38 points – Table 2) at all time points (T0–T6). The boxes represent the data variability. The lower end of the box corresponds to the value of 25% of the sample, the upper end corresponds to 75% of the sample, and the centerline is the median (50% of the samples).

* and º indicate the presence of outliers.

Thickness of the joint capsule in the transverse plane at the medial/lateral third metacarpal bone (CP M/CP L); thickness of the joint capsule insertion in the transverse plane in the third metacarpal bone (CP IN MT) and in the transverse place in the first phalanx (CP IN PH); thickness of the joint cartilage in the transverse plane in the medial/lateral condyles/sagittal crest (CA TK M/CA TK L/CA TK CR); cross-sectional area of the fetlock suspensory ligament medial/lateral branches (FSL M/FSL L); thickness in the longitudinal plane of the medial/lateral collateral ligaments (CL M/CL L) at origin (PO) and insertion (PI); plica thickness (PLICA); and annular ligament thickness (ANNULAR). *p value of the Friedman test (nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measures); different letters represent significant differences between time points.

Median values observed after classification of the ultrasound exam (ultrasound examination using scores ranging from 0 to 38 points – Table 2) at all time points (T0–T6). The boxes represent the data variability. The lower end of the box corresponds to the value of 25% of the sample, the upper end corresponds to 75% of the sample, and the centerline is the median (50% of the samples).

* and º indicate the presence of outliers. It is important to highlight that most of the ultrasonographic findings were mainly observed after T1. At the beginning of the training program (between T1 and T2), most of the Doppler ultrasound results presented synovitis with increased vascularization, increased and heterogeneous plica and an increased thickness of the joint capsule. Increased vascularization of the capsule and synovium, as observed with Doppler ultrasound, was a common finding in the joints with higher maximum flexion angles and positive forced flexion test results, and it was correlated with abnormalities in the synovial membrane, synovial fluid, and plica appearance. After T3, the findings from the ultrasonographic examination were most frequently associated with osteochondral irregularities and collateral ligament abnormalities. Nevertheless, after T3, many joints also showed increased vascularity. Radiographic examinations were performed as supplements to the ultrasonographic examinations to obtain data that can provide answers to any questions that may arise during the exams. However, no significant differences were observed in the results of the follow-up radiographic examinations.

DISCUSSION

Musculoskeletal disorders, including osteoarthritis, which is characterized by progressive and disabling symptoms, are common in sport horses. Articular cartilage degradation is associated with changes in the subchondral bone and soft tissues in this disease, which results in economic losses and a significant reduction in athletic horse performance [1125]. Thus, there is a growing demand for the detection of osteochondral degeneration and inflammatory processes in early osteoarthritis, where cell damage and molecular and enzymatic changes typically manifest first [916]. Given the importance of the cyclical trauma caused by sporting practices [11], it is essential to identify patients who are at risk of osteoarthritis to initiate early treatment when it is still possible to circumvent the destructive and disabling effects of osteoarthritis [16]. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the findings of early metacarpophalangeal joint disease resulting from training implementation. Predefined score tables were used successfully, which connected the ultrasound and physical examination results. The most striking result that emerged was that some joints undergo a period of overload adaptation and exercise adjustment, while others may or may not progress to pre-osteoarthritis or osteoarthritis. The metacarpophalangeal joint was chosen as the object of study because it is known that this structure is frequently affected by osteoarthritis in jumping horses due to the stress applied to it and its wide range of motion [226]. Furthermore, it is particularly susceptible to chondral damage, especially on the dorsal surface, and it is also predisposed to ligament injuries due to hyperextension [22627]. The horses evaluated in our study showed clear changes in the evaluated parameters. For example, there was a lower ability to flex the joint and higher scores on the physical examination at the time points following the start of training. We assume that these clinical findings most likely result from the joint adapting to training and that they may indicate an accumulated injury risk. It is well known that permanent changes in the joint structure, especially of the chondral tissue, may be triggered by the imposition of physical exercise on young animals, depending on the amount and type of exercise [28]. Nevertheless, progressive training is necessary because it promotes joint adaptation and development and accelerates the maturation of the joint, preparing it for work overload. However, it should be noted that there seems to be a delicate balance between the changes expected during the exercise adaptation process and the onset of osteoarthritis [2829]. It is widely known that sports training results in an inflammatory response in the joints, with increased chondral degradation, the release of various catabolic enzymes and the involvement of pro-inflammatory factors [829]. However, it is expected that the joints will adjust to the physiological needs imposed by exercise [29]. Consequently, during the study, the physical examination findings that reflect a worsening in the joint condition observed mainly after 6 months of training (T2) may be transient. Depending on the training (and rest periods) and proper athlete monitoring, this transient condition has a high possibility of progressing to osteoarthritis [29]. Thus, even if joints have the ability to sustain work overload, they are likely to undergo periods of greater degradation, which may be related to the development of pre-osteoarthritis or early osteoarthritis, as the training program can induce significant and progressive changes in the chondral biochemical composition [28]. The practice of exercise with repetitive trauma resulting from impacts significantly increases the onset of joint injuries and the development of degenerative joint diseases [2730]. The joints monitored in this study showed, after a period of increased joint change (T1/T2) demonstrated by higher scores in the physical and ultrasound examinations, a stabilized joint condition, which suggests an adaptation or partial recovery of joint health. However, the lameness scores increased over time, which may indicate that some overload changes became permanent. The intensity and frequency of training of jumping horses, corresponding to a high degree of exercise performed by these animals, can significantly contribute to the development of joint injuries, and it is always necessary to respect and observe the recommended limits to maintain joint and tissue health [231]. The idea that some animals may not recover from the exercise adjustment phase and may develop pre-osteoarthritis and consequently osteoarthritis should be considered. However, the imposition of mild to moderate training programs seems to protect the joints, even in young animals, through the mechanical stimulation of chondrocytes [32], and it is important to highlight that any exercise intensity affects the extracellular matrix and the chondrocytes [2833]. In addition to sports overload, other factors may predispose patients to joint injury. Genetic predisposition and environmental influences are the 2 primordial factors [916]. The experimental group of this study was uniform and was composed of Brazilian Sport Horses, which facilitated the standardization and process of comparing the parameters and scores. In addition, this study monitored the animals using easily applicable methods, the horses were housed in stud farms and training centers, and the horses participating in an athletic training program that is regularly used by the equestrian community. However, environmental factors, such as the type of diet, track quality and frequency of training, can induce the development of osteochondral changes [1016]. Therefore, both genetic influences and environmental factors should be considered when joint changes are observed, especially in young horses and during the training period. However, these issues were not considered and were not the objective of this study, as such an investigation would be complex due to the heterogeneous origin of the animals. When using ultrasound to monitor and diagnose joint diseases, especially osteoarthritis in its early stages, it is indispensable to have full anatomical knowledge of the joint, along with mastery of the ultrasound technique [434] and the science of morphological patterns [15], which were obtained at T0 in this study. During the evaluation, it is ideal to establish an injury score to describe the severity of the findings, preferably one that is associated with the physical examination or other imaging exams, thus enabling adequate monitoring of the patient and correlations with the treatment results [15]. During our study, in addition to the high physical examination scores, a series of ultrasound changes was also observed, such as osteochondral irregularities, changes related to the joint capsule, and plica and synovial vascularization. These results can be explained once it is known that exercise causes deleterious effects on the synovial membrane, such as thickening, increased vascularization and synovial proliferation [2829]. Furthermore, pro-inflammatory molecules are released into the synovial fluid of horses subjected to exercise [2829], and bone remodeling and chondral degradation can also be observed [12]. In addition, our study enabled the correlation of ultrasound findings with physical examination results. During the 18-month follow-up period, the joints showed a higher frequency of positive responses on the flexion test at the end of the study after T5. The lameness scores also increased over time. The changes described in the literature resulting from the imposition of exercise, such as lameness, positive responses on the flexion test, ultrasound changes in the subchondral bone and chondral tissue and increased vascularization [7812272935], were increasingly observed from T0 to T2. Thus, more studies need to be conducted to understand the potential of joint recovery and prevent constant degradation, taking into account the amount of training imposed and possible therapeutic interventions. Therefore, thorough monitoring of athletic horses is highly important. The ultrasound findings were also consistent with the changes found in metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis [2134] and were in agreement with the results of the physical examination. The ultrasound results reinforce the idea that the animals enter a period of articular degradation, or pre-osteoarthritis, after the imposition of physical exercise. Thus, the clinical and ultrasound monitoring of athlete horses is essential, and there is an obvious risk of developing joint diseases [916]. It is possible to modulate tissue adaptation to physical effort and to detect injuries early [931]. Therefore, we must try to identify which injuries are reversible (i.e., those resulting from possible joint adaptation) and which injuries may be irreversible. In addition, the workload can also be adjusted, and early therapy interventions can be initiated. Several diagnostic tests have been validated for the detection of osteoarthritis. However, in our study, ultrasound enabled the visualization and standardization of joint structure measurements, which improved the scoring system efficiency and provided an accurate examination of these horses. Therefore, ultrasound examinations are highly relevant in proposed joint assessment protocols. The scoring system based on clinical examinations and imaging methods was essential for standardization and obtaining accurate and predictive information, which thereby demonstrated the accuracy of ultrasound monitoring in a standardized model and the importance of a scoring system combined with a lameness assessment [15]. In conclusion, the horses showed visible changes primarily between 3 and 6 months after the onset of physical exercise, and the changes were evident in physical and ultrasound examination scores and articular angles. The worsening joint conditions most likely resulted from the adjustments and adaptations to exercise resulting from work overload. The ultrasound examination and lameness scores were slightly higher at the end of the study, suggesting that the changes observed after the implementation of exercise may be permanent or progressive and lead to a pre-osteoarthritis or early osteoarthritis stage. However, the horses also showed consistency in a portion of the findings during the follow-up period, indicating that this phase can also be part of an adaptive period in the long term. The proposed examination model, based on the scores, was shown to be adequate for following up athletic horses. Therefore, continuous clinical and ultrasound monitoring of the behavior of this joint in young athletic horses is critical, and it is essential to use an appropriate examination model that can be scored to identify early changes and individuals who are at risk. Further studies are encouraged to delimit the probable period of adaptation to exercise or pre-osteoarthritis onset. This information may help clarify the situations in which this condition progresses to the disease and correlate the intensity of the work and the response of each joint, thus allowing early therapeutic interventions and training adjustments to be implemented.
  22 in total

Review 1.  The response of bone, articular cartilage and tendon to exercise in the horse.

Authors:  Elwyn C Firth
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Diagnostic imaging of the equine fetlock region using radiography and ultrasonography. Part 1: Soft tissues.

Authors:  Katrien Vanderperren; Jimmy H Saunders
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 2.688

Review 3.  Early osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Henning Madry; Elizaveta Kon; Vincenzo Condello; Giuseppe M Peretti; Matthias Steinwachs; Romain Seil; Massimo Berruto; Lars Engebretsen; Giuseppe Filardo; Peter Angele
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effects of early exercise on metacarpophalangeal joints in horses.

Authors:  Chris E Kawcak; C Wayne McIlwraith; Elwyn C Firth
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  COMPARISONS AMONG RADIOGRAPHY, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR EX VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF STIFLE OSTEOARTHRITIS IN THE HORSE.

Authors:  Julie De Lasalle; Kate Alexander; Julien Olive; Sheila Laverty
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.363

6.  Association of type of sport and performance level with anatomical site of orthopaedic injury diagnosis.

Authors:  R C Murray; S J Dyson; C Tranquille; V Adams
Journal:  Equine Vet J Suppl       Date:  2006-08

7.  Detection of early osteoarthritis in the centrodistal joints of Icelandic horses: Evaluation of radiography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C J Ley; S Björnsdóttir; S Ekman; A Boyde; K Hansson
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Evaluation of experimental impact injury for inducing post-traumatic osteoarthritis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of horses.

Authors:  Ellen J Rickey; Antonio M Cruz; Donald R Trout; Beverly J McEwen; Mark B Hurtig
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 9.  Pathologic findings and pathogenesis of racetrack injuries.

Authors:  R R Pool; D M Meagher
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.792

Review 10.  Lameness Evaluation of the Athletic Horse.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Davidson
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.792

View more
  4 in total

1.  Osteoarthritis: a common disease that should be avoided in the athletic horse's life.

Authors:  Raquel Yvonne Arantes Baccarin; Sarah Raphaela Torquato Seidel; Yara Maria Michelacci; Paula Keiko Anadão Tokawa; Tiago Marcelo Oliveira
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Effects of oral treatment with chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine in an experimental model of metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis in horses.

Authors:  Ana Lucia Miluzzi Yamada; Cynthia do Prado Vendruscolo; Marília Ferrari Marsiglia; Eric Danilo Pauls Sotelo; Fernanda Rodrigues Agreste; Sarah Raphaela Torquato Seidel; Joice Fülber; Raquel Yvonne Arantes Baccarin; Luis Claudio Lopes Correia da Silva
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Elastosonographic features of the metacarpophalangeal joint capsule in horses.

Authors:  Paola Straticò; Giulia Guerri; Adriana Palozzo; Paola Di Francesco; Massimo Vignoli; Vincenzo Varasano; Lucio Petrizzi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  2D-SWE of the Metacarpophalangeal Joint Capsule in Horses.

Authors:  Giulia Guerri; Adriana Palozzo; Paola Straticò; Vincenzo Varasano; Gianluca Celani; Paola Di Francesco; Massimo Vignoli; Lucio Petrizzi
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.