| Literature DB >> 32476309 |
Ana Lúcia M Yamada1, Marcelo Pinheiro2, Marília F Marsiglia3, Stefano Carlo F Hagen3, Raquel Yvonne A Baccarin4, Luís Cláudio L C da Silva3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical exercise is known to cause significant joint changes. Thus, monitoring joint behavior of athletic horses is essential in early disorders recognition, allowing the proper management.Entities:
Keywords: Equine; jumping horse; lameness; metacarpophalangeal joint; osteoarthritis; ultrasound imaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 32476309 PMCID: PMC7263911 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Sci ISSN: 1229-845X Impact factor: 1.672
Score-based physical examination protocol
| Variables | Categories | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Lameness (AAEP) | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| Response to the flexion test | Negative | 0 |
| Positive + 1 degree | 1 | |
| Positive + 2 degrees | 2 | |
| Positive + 3 degrees | 3 | |
| Limb functional impotence | 4 | |
| Decrease in maximum flexion angle (in degrees) | ≤ to 5° | 0 |
| 6° to 10° | 1 | |
| 11° to 15° | 2 | |
| 16° to 20° | 3 | |
| ≥ to 20° | 4 | |
| Increase in joint perimeter (in cm) | ≤ 0.5 cm | 0 |
| 0.6 to 2.0 cm | 1 | |
| 2.1 to 4.0 cm | 2 | |
| 4.1 to 6.0 cm | 3 | |
| ≥ 6.1 cm | 4 | |
| Changes upon local palpation | Normal | 0 |
| Mild reaction | 1 | |
| Moderate discomfort and/or mild change in mobility | 2 | |
| Moderate discomfort and/or moderate change in mobility | 3 | |
| Significant discomfort and/or abnormalities of mobility, crepitation | 4 | |
| Total (final sum) | 21 |
Physical examination protocol used a scale ranging from 0 to 21 points (final sum) and considered the lameness examination (0 to 5 points according to the AAEP score [22]), response to the flexion test (score after the forced flexion test, AAEP score), decrease in the maximum flexion angle (metacarpophalangeal joint angle measurement, based on T0), increase in the joint perimeter (based on T0) and changes upon local palpation.
AAEP, American Association of Equine Practitioners.
Classification and scoring of each evaluated parameter in the ultrasound examination using a scale ranging from 0 to 38 points (final sum)
| Variables | Categories | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Synovial fluid appearance | Normal | 0 |
| Anechoic | 1 | |
| Predominantly anechoic | 2 | |
| Predominantly heterogeneous | 3 | |
| Heterogeneous with hyperechoic floating foci/debris | 4 | |
| Synovial fluid amount | Normal | 0 |
| Increased + | 1 | |
| Increased ++ | 2 | |
| Increased +++ | 3 | |
| Increased ++++ | 4 | |
| Joint capsule thickness | Normal | 0 |
| Increased by 20% in localized areas | 1 | |
| Increase | 2 | |
| Increase by more than 20% | 3 | |
| Joint capsule appearance | Normal | 0 |
| Localized hypoechogenic area | 1 | |
| Hypoechogenic areas with hyperechogenic foci | 2 | |
| Joint capsule insertion | Smooth | 0 |
| Discretely irregular | 1 | |
| Irregular | 2 | |
| Severe irregularity | 3 | |
| Appearance of periarticular ligaments | Normal | 0 |
| Heterogeneous and/or hypoechogenic areas | 1 | |
| Heterogeneous and/or hyperechogenic areas | 2 | |
| Massive injury or rupture | 3 | |
| Origin and insertion of articular/periarticular ligaments | Normal | 0 |
| Presence of irregularities | 1 | |
| Discrete bone proliferation | 2 | |
| Severe bone proliferation | 3 | |
| Severe bone proliferation and/or fragments | 4 | |
| Synovial vascularization | Normal | 0 |
| Slightly increased vascularization | 1 | |
| Increased vascularization | 2 | |
| Joint cartilage thickness and appearance | Well-defined, continuous chondral line, smooth and easily identifiable | 0 |
| Difficult-to-identify chondral line with 50% of surface preserved | 1 | |
| Difficult-to-identify chondral line, discontinuous and rough | 2 | |
| No identification of the line with presence of fragments | 3 | |
| Absence of the line with diffuse subchondral alteration | 4 | |
| Subchondral surface appearance | Smooth | 0 |
| Irregular | 1 | |
| Areas of depression | 2 | |
| Synovial plica appearance | Normal | 0 |
| Predominantly hyperechogenic | 1 | |
| Hyperechogenic calcification sites | 2 | |
| Synovial plica size | Normal | 0 |
| Increased up to 50% | 1 | |
| Increased by more than 50% | 2 | |
| Presence of subchondral osteophytes | Smooth joint margin | 0 |
| Rough joint margin | 1 | |
| Presence of osteophytes | 2 | |
| Evident osteophytes or fragments | 3 | |
| Total (final sum) | 38 |
Fig. 1Mean values observed after classification of the physical examination (score-based physical examination protocol, classified using scores ranging from 0 to 21 points – Table 1) at all time points (T0–T6).
*There was a significant difference (p < 0,05) between T0 and the other time points and between T1 and T2.
Measured value of maximum flexion angles measurement observed at all time points (T0–T6)
| Time points | Angle | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median | Percentile 25%–75% | |
| T0 | 139.7 ± 8.2a | 140a | 134–146 |
| T1 | 142.7 ± 8.3b | 144b | 137–149 |
| T2 | 148.5 ± 5.3c | 150c | 146–151 |
| T3 | 146.8 ± 4.3de | 148de | 144–149 |
| T4 | 147.9 ± 3.9cd | 147cd | 145–150 |
| T5 | 146.3 ± 3.3e | 147e | 144–149 |
| T6 | 144.2 ± 3.9b | 144b | 142–148 |
| < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
*p value of the Friedman test (nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measures); different letters represent significant differences between time points.
Fig. 2Comparison of the median flexion angle values. The boxes represent the variability of the data. The lower end of the box corresponds to the value of 25% of the sample, the upper end corresponds to 75% of the sample, and the centerline is the median (50% of the samples).
º indicates the presence of outliers.
Fig. 3Mean of the lameness scores for the AAEP scores (p = 0.331), 0–10 complementary score (p = 0.124), and after forced flexion (Flex) (p = 0.321) during the study period (T0– T6). There was no statistical difference in the evaluated scores.AAEP, American Association of Equine Practitioners.
Fig. 4Ultrasound images showing the primary observed changes: osteochondral irregularities in the articular surface of the main metacarpal bone (arrows in A and B); articular capsule heterogeneity (C); increased and heterogeneous plica (arrows in D and E) and synovitis and increased vascularization (F).
Values of the morphological patterns observed in the T0 ultrasound examination
| Variables | Mean (cm) | SD |
|---|---|---|
| CP M | 0.646 | 0.135 |
| CP L | 0.590 | 0.108 |
| CP IN MT | 0.342 | 0.068 |
| CP IN PH | 0.266 | 0.073 |
| CA TK M | 0.104 | 0.025 |
| CA TK L | 0.080 | 0.020 |
| CA TK CR | 0.115 | 0.040 |
| CL L PO | 0.408 | 0.069 |
| CL L PI | 0.464 | 0.068 |
| CL M PO | 0.430 | 0.077 |
| CL M PI | 0.428 | 0.073 |
| PLICA | 0.308 | 0.067 |
| ANNULAR | 0.192 | 0.034 |
| FSL L | 1.413 | 0.347 |
| FSL M | 1.584 | 0.359 |
Thickness of the joint capsule in the transverse plane at the medial/lateral third metacarpal bone (CP M/CP L); thickness of the joint capsule insertion in the transverse plane in the third metacarpal bone (CP IN MT) and in the transverse place in the first phalanx (CP IN PH); thickness of the joint cartilage in the transverse plane in the medial/lateral condyles/sagittal crest (CA TK M/CA TK L/CA TK CR); cross-sectional area of the fetlock suspensory ligament medial/lateral branches (FSL M/FSL L); thickness in the longitudinal plane of the medial/lateral collateral ligaments (CL M/CL L) at origin (PO) and insertion (PI); plica thickness (PLICA); and annular ligament thickness (ANNULAR).
Measured value of values observed in the ultrasound exam (ultrasound examination using scores ranging from 0 to 38 points – Table 2) at all time points (T0–T6)
| Time points | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median | Percentile 25–75% | |
| T0 | 2.1 ± 1.5a | 2a | 1–3 |
| T1 | 3.3 ± 2.1b | 3b | 2–5 |
| T2 | 3.1 ± 2.7ab | 2ab | 1–5 |
| T3 | 3.4 ± 2.2b | 3b | 2–4 |
| T4 | 3.6 ± 2.8b | 3b | 1–6 |
| T5 | 4.1 ± 2.3b | 4b | 2–5 |
| T6 | 4.4 ± 2.1b | 5b | 3–6 |
| < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
*p value of the Friedman test (nonparametric analysis of variance for repeated measures); different letters represent significant differences between time points.
Fig. 5Median values observed after classification of the ultrasound exam (ultrasound examination using scores ranging from 0 to 38 points – Table 2) at all time points (T0–T6). The boxes represent the data variability. The lower end of the box corresponds to the value of 25% of the sample, the upper end corresponds to 75% of the sample, and the centerline is the median (50% of the samples).
* and º indicate the presence of outliers.