Literature DB >> 32475704

Low-Income Parents' Use of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels in a Virtual Supermarket.

Jonathan L Blitstein1, Joanne F Guthrie2, Caroline Rains3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact front-of-package nutrition labels (FOPLs) have on decision-making abilities among low-income parents in a virtual supermarket.
DESIGN: A 4-by-2 experimental design with 3 FOPLs (summary, nutrient-specific, hybrid) and a no-FOPL comparison. Within the FOPL condition, participants either shopped with a time limit (10 minutes) or with no time limit.
SETTING: A web-based, 3-dimensional virtual supermarket. PARTICIPANTS: Parents (n = 1,452) from low-income households with at least 1 child aged 4-12 years. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: Index derived from the United Kingdom's Nutrient Profiling Model that summarized the overall nutrient profile of the participant's shopping basket. ANALYSIS: Analysis of covariance with post hoc estimations (pairwise) of condition means adjusted for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: All FOPLs led to healthier nutrient profiles than the no-FOPL condition (P < .001). Simple FOPLs (ie, summary, hybrid) led to healthier nutrient profiles than nutrient-specific FOPLs (P = .02 and P < .001, respectively). Among parents exposed to simple FOPLs, those under time pressure made less healthy choices than those who were not under time pressure (P = .05 and P = .03, respectively). Time pressure did not affect parents exposed to nutrient-specific FOPLs (P = .69). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Front-of-package nutrition labels can aid parents in selecting healthier products. Simple FOPLs provide greater utility for selecting healthier products than FOPLs that present an array of nutrient information. Time pressure can influence how parents interact with different types of label information.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  experimental design; front of package; nutrition labeling; virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32475704     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav        ISSN: 1499-4046            Impact factor:   3.045


  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Toddler Milk Claims on Beliefs and Misperceptions: A Randomized Experiment with Parents of Young Children.

Authors:  Ana Paula C Richter; Emily W Duffy; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Jennifer L Harris; Jennifer L Pomeranz; Marissa G Hall
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Using a Naturalistic Store Laboratory for Clinical Trials of Point-of-Sale Nutrition Policies and Interventions: A Feasibility and Validation Study.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Isabella C A Higgins; Anna H Grummon; Allison J Lazard; Carmen E Prestemon; Jennifer Mendel Sheldon; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Secondary Outcomes of a Front-of-Pack-Labelling Randomised Controlled Experiment in a Representative British Sample: Understanding, Ranking Speed and Perceptions.

Authors:  Jessica Packer; Simon J Russell; Deborah Ridout; Anne Conolly; Curtis Jessop; Russell M Viner; Helen Croker
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Nutrition-related claims lead parents to choose less healthy drinks for young children: a randomized trial in a virtual convenience store.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Allison J Lazard; Isabella C A Higgins; Jonathan L Blitstein; Emily W Duffy; Eva Greenthal; Sarah Sorscher; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Marketing of sugar-sweetened children's drinks and parents' misperceptions about benefits for young children.

Authors:  Frances Fleming-Milici; Lindsay Phaneuf; Jennifer L Harris
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.660

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.