Literature DB >> 32475622

Biases in diagnostic terminology: Clinicians choose different symptom labels depending on whether the same case is framed as depression or schizophrenia.

Jule Meiseberg1, Steffen Moritz2.   

Abstract

Negative symptoms in schizophrenia show striking similarities to some depressive symptoms. Different terms are often used for these phenomenologically similar symptoms depending on the context, such as avolition (most often used in the context of schizophrenia) and lack of drive (most often used in the context of depression). To test whether clinicians assign different symptom labels to the same clinical picture based on the cued diagnosis, 98 clinical psychologists and psychiatrists were presented with two case studies that were randomly framed as characterizing an individual with either depression or schizophrenia. An interaction of the symptom label group selected by the clinicians with the framing condition confirmed our hypothesis: despite identical content, clinicians favored different clinical terms depending on the cued diagnosis (p = .025, η2partial = 0.054). This result was supported by the suspected diagnosis suggested by the clinicians; numerically, they more often confirmed than rejected the cued diagnosis. The present study is in line with earlier findings indicative of strong overlap pertaining to the phenomenology of negative symptoms in schizophrenia and depressive symptoms that suggest that clinical terminology should be streamlined. The hypothesis that core symptoms of both syndromes tap largely the same construct should be further pursued. If true, the concept of negative symptoms, currently used to describe schizophrenia alone, should be opened up for describing symptoms in other disorders. This could help to gain a deeper understanding of the transdiagnostic appearances of the negative syndrome.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cued diagnosis; Depression; Diagnostic bias; Labeling; Schizophrenia; Terminology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32475622     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  2 in total

1.  Information extraction from free text for aiding transdiagnostic psychiatry: constructing NLP pipelines tailored to clinicians' needs.

Authors:  Rosanne J Turner; Femke Coenen; Femke Roelofs; Karin Hagoort; Aki Härmä; Peter D Grünwald; Fleur P Velders; Floortje E Scheepers
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.144

Review 2.  Gut dysbiosis in severe mental illness and chronic fatigue: a novel trans-diagnostic construct? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenelle Marcelle Safadi; Alice M G Quinton; Belinda R Lennox; Philip W J Burnet; Amedeo Minichino
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 15.992

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.