Literature DB >> 32475478

Access to the learning material enhances learning by means of generating questions: Comparing open- and closed-book conditions.

Mirjam Ebersbach1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generating questions by learners might be a potent learning technique but previous research yielded several shortcomings and underlying mechanisms are not well understood.
METHODS: Students (N = 231) first read an expository text including bold keywords and then generated questions and answers referring to these keywords in three conditions: (1) open-book (i.e., text accessible), (2) closed-book (i.e., text inaccessible), and (3) cued closed-book (i.e., only keywords provided).
RESULTS: In a test after one week, students in the open-book and in the cued closed-book conditions performed better than students in the restudying condition. The number of generated questions and answers was largest in the open-book condition, smaller in the cued closed-book condition and smallest in the closed-book condition and predicted final test performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Generating questions and answers is an effective tool to boost retention in university learning when (at least part of) the learning material remains accessible.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Closed-book; Long-term retention; Open-book; Question generation; Retrieval practice; University learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32475478     DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci Educ        ISSN: 2211-9493


  1 in total

Review 1.  The Retrieval Practice Hypothesis in Research on Learning by Teaching: Current Status and Challenges.

Authors:  Keiichi Kobayashi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.