| Literature DB >> 32475451 |
Wenxiang Luo1, Hui Xue1, Chunhong Xiong2, Jianke Li1, Yonggang Tu3, Yan Zhao4.
Abstract
The effects of storage temperature (4°C, 25°C, and 35°C) on sensory quality, physicochemical properties, texture, molecular forces, flavor, and microbial indexes of preserved eggs were studied. The results showed that the sensory quality, weight loss rate, pH, and color of preserved eggs were significantly different at different storage temperatures (P < 0.05). Compared with high temperature and normal temperature storage, low temperature storage reduced weight loss rate by 55.15 and 64.1%, respectively, improved the sensory score (P < 0.05), inhibited the reduction of pH and the increase of total volatile base nitrogen (P < 0.05), and decreased the change of color (P < 0.05). During storage, there was no difference in the springiness of preserved egg white stored at different temperatures (P > 0.05). Hardness and chewiness at 3 different temperatures increased first and then decreased, and low temperature significantly inhibited the progress of these changes to a certain extent (P < 0.05). The content of ionic bond in egg white first decreased and then increased, and content of disulfide bond increased first and then decreased. Content of ionic bond in yolk decreased all the time, and high temperature could promote this change. Whatever the temperature was, the content of free amino acids in preserved egg white and yolk increased first and then decreased, and the total content of amino acids stored at different temperatures was significantly different (P < 0.05). The content of free fatty acids in yolk decreased. At the end of storage, no microorganisms were detected in 3 temperatures during the storage period of 84 D. The results showed that low temperature storage is more conducive for preservation of preserved eggs.Entities:
Keywords: preserved egg; quality; storage; temperature
Year: 2020 PMID: 32475451 PMCID: PMC7597647 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Sensory evaluation.
| Index | 3 points | 2 points | 1 points | 0 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Brown transparent | Yellow transparent | Dark brown opaque | Brown-black opacity |
| Appearance | Full and complete form | slightly defective | Large defect | Severe defect or liquefaction |
| Texture | Elasticity | Hardness increases | Hardness is very high | Shrinkage |
| Flavor | Rich fragrance | The fragrance fades | No fragrance | Mildew taste heavier |
| Taste | Normal, odorless | Taste light | A slight odor | Heavy odor |
Figure 1Effects of storage temperatures on sensory quality of preserved eggs.
Figure 2Effects of different storage temperatures on the preserved egg rate of weight loss (A) and the moisture of egg white (B) and yolk (C).
Figure 3Effects of storage temperatures on pH value of preserved egg white (A) and yolk (B).
Effect of storage temperature on color of preserved eggs.
| Days | Protein color value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L∗ | a∗ | b∗ | |||||||
| 4°C | 25°C | 35°C | 4°C | 25°C | 35°C | 4°C | 25°C | 35°C | |
| 0 D | 33.95 ± 1.3a | 33.95 ± 1.3a | 33.95 ± 1.3a | 7.77 ± 1.5a | 7.77 ± 1.45b,c | 7.77 ± 1.45c | 18.42 ± 2.2c | 18.42 ± 2.2a | 18.42 ± 2.20a |
| 14 D | 35.24 ± 0.9a | 32.84 ± 1.4a | 32.58 ± 0.8a | 6.48 ± 2.2a | 6.72 ± 1.56c | 9.0 ± 2.28b,c | 18.6 ± 1.7c | 15.42 ± 1.3a | 6.03 ± 1.65c |
| 28 D | 37.79 ± 1.9a,b | 31.79 ± 1.5a | 32.15 ± 0.9a | 7.76 ± 0.9a | 9.63 ± 1.75b,c | 11.84 ± 0.99a,b | 20.6 ± 1.6c | 11.66 ± 1.83b | 8.85 ± 1.1b |
| 42 D | 43.7 ± 1.7c | 28.35 ± 0.7b | 25.4 ± 0.5b | 6.64 ± 0.9a | 10.06 ± 1.69b | 13.22 ± 1.44a | 25.58 ± 2.1b | 12.07 ± 1.33b | 5.87 ± 0.79c |
| 56 D | 48.25 ± 0.9d | 25.86 ± 1.0c | 25.47 ± 0.4b | 6.73 ± 1.4a | 15.98 ± 1.9a | 6.88 ± 1.6c | 26.97 ± 1.21a,b | 11.83 ± 3.31b | −0.74 ± 0.77e |
| 70 D | 49.36 ± 0.8d | 24.31 ± 1.1c | 22.41 ± 0.9c | 7.5 ± 0.5a | 9.82 ± 2.3b | 8.11 ± 1.47b,c | 27.77 ± 1.01a | 1.13 ± 1.59d | −0.23 ± 1.14d |
| 84 D | 36.67 ± 0.6b | 22.97 ± 0.8d | 20.97 ± 0.7d | 10.21 ± 2.6b | 9.53 ± 0.94b | 10.53 ± 1.66b | 21.03 ± 2.5c | 5.21 ± 1.85c | 4.06 ± 1.47c |
a-fDifferent superscript letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Effects of storage temperatures on protein structure properties of preserved eggs.
Figure 5Protein fraction (%) of preserved egg gels in different solutions: 0.6 M sodium chloride (S1); 0.6 M sodium chloride + 1.5 M urea (S2); 0.6 M sodium chloride + 8 M urea (S3); and 0.6 M sodium chloride + 8 M urea + 0.5 M β-mercaptoethanol (S4).
Figure 6Effects of storage temperatures on free fatty acid content of preserved egg yolk.
Figure 7Effects of storage temperatures on free amino acid of preserved egg white and yolk.
Figure 8Effects of different storage temperatures on volatile salt nitrogen in preserved egg white (A) and yolk (B).