Literature DB >> 32475431

Immune response and protective efficacy of recombinant Enterococcus faecalis displaying dendritic cell-targeting peptide fused with Eimeria tenella 3-1E protein.

Wenjing Chen1, Chunli Ma2, Dian Wang1, Guanghao Li1, Dexing Ma3.   

Abstract

Avian coccidiosis causes significant economic losses on the global poultry breeding industry. Exploration of new-concept vaccines against coccidiosis has gradually become a research hotspot. In this study, an Enterococcus faecalis strain (MDXEF-1) showing excellent performance isolated from chicken intestinal tract was used as a vector to deliver Eimeria target protein. The plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA harboring dendritic cell-targeting peptide (DCpep) fusion with Eimeria tenella NAΔ3-1E gene (3-1E protein-coding gene without start codon ATG and terminator codon TAA) was electrotransformed into MDXEF-1 to generate the recombinant bacteria MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA in which NAΔ3-1E protein was covalently anchored to the surface of bacteria cells by cell wall anchor (CWA) sequence. The expression of target fusion protein DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was detected by Western blot. Each chicken was immunized 3 times at 2-wk intervals with live E. faecalis expressing DCpep-NAΔ3-1E fusion protein (DCpep-NAΔ3-1E group), live E. faecalis expressing NAΔ3-1E protein (NAΔ3-1E group), and live E. faecalis containing empty vector only. The 3 immunized groups were then challenged with homologous E. tenella sporulated oocyst after immunizations, and the immune response and protective efficacy in each group were evaluated. The results showed that serum IgG levels, secretory IgA levels in cecal lavage, proportion of CD4+ and CD8α+ cells in peripheral blood, and mRNA expression levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ in the spleen were significantly higher in chickens in the DCpep-NAΔ3-1E group than in chickens of the NAΔ3-1E group (P < 0.05). Oral immunization to chickens with live E. faecalis expressing DCpep-NAΔ3-1E offered more protective efficacy against homologous challenge including significant improved body weight gain, increased oocyst decrease ratio, and reduced average lesion scores in cecum compared with chickens with live E. faecalis expressing NAΔ3-1E protein. These results suggest that recombinant E. faecalis expressing dendritic cell-targeting peptide fusion with E. tenella 3-1E protein could be a potential approach for prevention of Eimeria infection.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCpep-NAΔ3-1E; Eimeria tenella; Enterococcus faecalis; immune response; protective efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32475431      PMCID: PMC7597732          DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


Introduction

Avian coccidiosis, a widely spread intestinal protozoan disease caused by single or multiple Eimeria species, leads to severe economic losses on the global poultry breeding industry (Dalloul and Lillehoj, 2006, Blake and Tomley, 2014). Eimeria tenella is one of the most prevalent Eimeria species in chicken, which mainly parasitized in the cecum and caused necrotic gut lesions, decreased feed utilization, and further impaired growth rate and even mortality. Nowadays, conventional strategies against coccidiosis primarily rely on prophylactic chemotherapy and application of live attenuated vaccines. However, emergence of drug resistant strains of Eimeria and drug residues in poultry products renders chemotherapy an unsustainable control method against coccidiosis (Shirley et al., 2007). Meanwhile, use of several known live Eimeria vaccines against coccidiosis sometimes may revert to virulence that causes immune failure and unexpected infection (Clarke et al., 2014). Recently, exploration of novel vaccines aiming at preventing avian coccidiosis has gradually become a research hot spot. It was reported that several novel delivery vectors could be used as tools to express Eimeria target proteins, mainly including tobacco, ginsenoside-based nanoparticles, Mycobacterium bovis, Bacillus Calmette–Guerin, Bacillus subtilis, and Pichia pastoris (Sathish et al., 2012, Zhang et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2014, Chen et al., 2015, Lin et al., 2015). Besides the aforementioned delivery tools, lactic acid bacteria are considered to be an ideal oral delivery vector with many advantages, including safety profile, convenient route of oral administration, weak immune response against itself, and establishing specific mucosal immunity (BaheyEI-Din et al., 2010). Effects of probiotics supplementation via feed or water on performance and response of chickens to Eimeria challenge were reported (Giannenas et al., 2014, Ritzi et al., 2014). In our laboratory, recombinant Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 expressing cytoplasmic, secreted, and anchored E. tenella 3-1E, E. tenella AMA1 protein, especially Lactococci expressing anchored target protein, was shown to provide partial protection against homologous challenge (Ma et al., 2013, Ma et al., 2017, Li et al., 2018). In recent years, studies of the intestinal bacteria flora have already become a hotspot. However, research using intestinal symbiotic bacteria as a delivery tool to express important Eimeria proteins was not reported until now. In our previous research, a strain of Enterococcus faecalis (named MDXEF-1) showing excellent performance was isolated from chicken ceca and characterized to be a delivery tool to express heterologous protein (data not published, Chinese patent ZL201410817717.5). We postulated that the recombinant live symbiotic E. faecalis-expressing anchored Eimeria 3-1E protein would provide immune protections against homologous challenge. Dendritic cells (DC), a kind of professional antigen-presenting cells existed in the subepithelial lamina propria of the intestine, play a vital role in inducing humoral and cellular intestinal immune responses (Chirdo et al., 2005). Previous research demonstrated that fusion protein consists of DC-targeting peptide (DCpep), and protective antigen delivered by Lactobacillus effectively enhanced the antigen-induced systemic immune response (Mohamadzadeh et al., 2009). Will the reported DCpep fused with E. tenella protective antigen enhances the immunogenicity of the target protein? The main purpose of this study was to explore the immune response and protections against Eimeria challenge provided by the recombinant E. faecalis-expressing DCpep fused with the E. tenella 3-1E protein.

Materials and methods

Strains and Plasmids

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. tenella 3-1E polyclonal antibody was prepared and preserved in our laboratory (Ma et al., 2011). Probiotic strain of E. faecalis MDXEF-1 showing several excellent performances, including acid- and bile-resistant profile and antimicrobial property, isolated from ceca of chicken was stored in our laboratory and was characterized to be a delivery tool to express target protein (data not published). E. faecalis MDXEF-1 cells were cultured at 30°C without shaking in M17 medium (Luqiao, Beijing) supplemented with 5 g/L glucose (GM17) and 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol.
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Bacterial strain orplasmidsRelevant characteristicsSource or references
Strain
 Escherichia coli DH5αSupE44ΔlacU169(φ80 lacZΔM15) hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1, plasmid-freeTaKaRa
 Lactococcus lacts subsp. cremoris NZ9000Derivate strain of MG1363, with nisR and nisK genes for nisin induction, plasmid-free strainNIZO
 Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1Isolated from a healthy chicken intestinal tract, with excellent properties, plasmid-free strain (data not published)Stored in our laboratory
 MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-Δ3-1E-CWAWith plasmid pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA in E. faecalis MDXEF-1This study
 MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-Δ3-1E-CWAWith plasmid/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA in E. faecalis MDXEF-1This study
 MDXEF-1/pTX8048With plasmid pTX8048 in E. faecalis MDXEF-1Ma et al., 2013
plasmid
 pTX8048pNZ8048 carrying 6 × his-tagged (His6) and thioredoxin (trxA) gene of E. coli; CmDouillard et al., 2011
 pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWAWith fragment encoding signal peptide of secretion protein Usp45, NAΔ3-1E protein (without start codon ATG and terminator codon TAA) and cell wall anchor region with LPXTG-type anchoring motif in P TX8048Ma et al., 2017
 pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWAWith fragment encoding signal peptide of secretion protein Usp45, dendritic cell–targeting peptides, NAΔ3-1E protein and cell wall anchor region with LPXTG-type anchoring motif in P TX8048This study
 pUC57-SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6With fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6, synthesized by Nanjing GenScript Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China)This study
Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Construction of the Recombinant E. faecalis Expressing DCpep-NAΔ3-1E Fusion Protein

Construction of the plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA is displayed in Figure 1. The fusion fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6 consists of a signal peptide (SP) of Lactococcus lactis secretion protein Usp45, DCpep (Curiel et al., 2004), linker sequence (G4S)2, coding sequence of trxA protein, and His6 amino acid was synthesized by Nanjing GenScript Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) and was then cloned into pUC57 vector to generate plasmid pUC57-SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6. The purified fusion gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6 was subcloned into the Nco I/BamH I sites of pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA plasmid (Ma et al., 2017) to generate pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. The plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA, pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA, and empty vector pTX8048 (Douillard et al., 2011) were respectively transformed into E. faecalis MDXEF-1 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The subsequent screening and characterization of 3 recombinant-positive bacteria MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 were carried out as described in our previous report (Ma et al., 2017).
Figure 1

The schematic illustration of plasmids pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA harboring synthesized fusion gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6. The fusion gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6 consists of signal peptide (SP) of Lactococcus lactis secretion protein Usp45, detritic cell-targeting peptides (DCpep) (Curiel et al., 2004), linker sequence (G4S)2, and coding sequence of trxA protein and His6 amino acid and was synthesized by Nanjing GenScript Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The target gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6 was digested by Nco Ⅰ/BamH Ⅰ, and then subcloned into Nco Ⅰ/BamH Ⅰ sites of pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (A) (Ma et al., 2017) to construct plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (B).

The schematic illustration of plasmids pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA harboring synthesized fusion gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6. The fusion gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6 consists of signal peptide (SP) of Lactococcus lactis secretion protein Usp45, detritic cell-targeting peptides (DCpep) (Curiel et al., 2004), linker sequence (G4S)2, and coding sequence of trxA protein and His6 amino acid and was synthesized by Nanjing GenScript Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The target gene fragment SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6 was digested by Nco Ⅰ/BamH Ⅰ, and then subcloned into Nco Ⅰ/BamH Ⅰ sites of pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (A) (Ma et al., 2017) to construct plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (B).

Western Blot Analysis

The cell wall–anchored fusion protein DCpep-NAΔ3-1E was prepared as previously described (Ma et al., 2017). Briefly, bacteria pellets were washed and resuspended in TES (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, and 25% sucrose). The buffer TES-LMR (TES containing 1 mg/mL lysozyme, 0.1 mg/mL mutanolysin, and 0.1 mg/mL RNase) was used to digest the cell wall. After centrifugation, the target cell wall–anchored protein existed in the supernatant was precipitated with 16% trichloroacetic acid. The harvested fusion protein DCpep-NAΔ3-1E was washed, dried, and then resuspended in 50 mM NaOH. The prepared cell wall–anchored DCpep-NAΔ3-1E protein samples were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and then electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were probed with rabbit anti-3-1E specific antibodies (Ma et al., 2011) for 1.5 h. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Sigma, USA), the membranes were washed with TTBS (Tris-HCl 20 mmol/L, pH 7.5, NaCl 100 mmol/L, 0.1% Tween-20), and then, target bands were detected using ECL Chemiluminescence Detection Kit as per the manufacturer's instructions.

Oral Immunization and Challenge Experiment

One-day-old specific pathogen–free white Leghorn chickens were purchased from Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Harbin, China. At 5 D of age, all chickens were weighed, and chickens with similar body weights were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups of 35 chickens each. Chickens were housed in individual cages (Table 2). Chickens in group 1 were immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA; group 2 with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA; and group 3 with MDXEF-1/pTX8048, orally with a 100 μL volume containing 5 × 109 CFU recombinant bacteria on 3 consecutive day at 2-wk intervals for a total of 3 immunizations. Chickens in the unchallenged control group 4 and challenged control group 5 were both sham inoculated, orally with 100 μL PBS (pH 7.2). At 54 D of age, all chickens (except those in group 4) were challenged orally with 2 × 104 E. tenella sporulated oocysts. Animal experiments were performed in accordance with the regulations of the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Table 2

Experimental design of immunizations and challenge.

GroupsNumberImmunizations1
Challenge2
Primary immunization at day of 5, 6, and 7Secondary immunization at day of 21, 22, and 23Third immunization at day of 37, 38, and 39Challenge at day of 54
135MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (100 μL)MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (100 μL)MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (100 μL)Challenge
235MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (100 μL)MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (100 μL)MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (100 μμL)Challenge
335MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (100 μμL)MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (100 μL)MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (100 μL)Challenge
435PBS (pH7.2)PBS (pH7.2)PBS (pH7.2)Unchallenge
535PBS (pH7.2)PBS (pH7.2)PBS (pH7.2)Challenge

Oral immunizations with recombinant Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1 (100 μL containing 5 × 109 CFU per chicken) for 3 times, each for 3 consecutive day at intervals of 2 wk.

At 54 day of age, chickens except for group 4 were challenged orally with 2 × 104 sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella.

Experimental design of immunizations and challenge. Oral immunizations with recombinant Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1 (100 μL containing 5 × 109 CFU per chicken) for 3 times, each for 3 consecutive day at intervals of 2 wk. At 54 day of age, chickens except for group 4 were challenged orally with 2 × 104 sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella.

Humoral Immune Responses Induced by 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis

On day 14 after each immunization, serum and cecal lavage fluid were prepared from chickens (n = 5) in each group. Specific serum IgG levels and secreted IgA (sIgA) levels in cecal lavage fluid were determined by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as per the protocol as previously described (Ma et al., 2017). Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with 100 μL (1.0 μg) E. tenella 3-1E proteins per well and incubated overnight at 4°C. Each well was then blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20. Then, 100 μL of diluted serum (1:128) and cecal lavage fluid (1:100) were added to each well to incubate at 37°C. The secondary antibody horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-chicken IgG and goat anti-chicken IgA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) diluted at a ratio of 1:1,500 was added to incubate at 37°C. The substrate solution (0.01% H2O2 and 1 mg/mL o-phenylenediamine) was added to stop the reaction. Each sample was tested in triplicate.

Cellular Immune Responses Induced by 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis

On day 14 after third oral immunization, lymphocytes in peripheral blood from 5 chickens in each group were isolated using Lymphocyte Separation Medium (1.077 g/mL) (Tianjin Haoyang Biological Manufacture, China) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. The isolated cells were adjusted to a final concentration of 1 × 107 cells/mL. A volume of100 μL of lymphocytes containing 1 × 106 cells was incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated mouse anti-chicken CD4+ antibody (0.5 mg/mL) and phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-chicken CD8α+ antibody (0.5 mg/mL) (Southern Biotech) for 20 min at 4°C in the dark. After centrifuging the mixture, the cell pellets were washed with PBS (pH7.4) twice and then resuspended in 500 μL of PBS (pH7.4). The relative quantification of T lymphocytes subtypes was measured by flow cytometry (Epics XL MCL, Beckman Coulter).

Expression of Chicken IL-2 and Chicken IFN- γ in the Spleen

On day 14 after third oral immunization, the spleens from 5 chickens in each group were sampled. The mRNA expression levels of chicken interleukin-2 (ChIL-2) and chicken gamma interferon (ChIFN-γ) in the spleen were quantified using real-time PCR as described in a previous report (Wang et al., 2018). Briefly, total RNA extracted from spleens was reverse transcribed, and the real-time PCR was performed using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (TaKaRa Biotech Corp., Dalian, China) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The primers pairs ChIL-2-F/ChIL-2-R and ChIFN-γ-F/ChIFN-γ-R used for real-time PCR are listed in Table 3. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as an internal reference. The mRNA expression levels of ChIL-2 and ChIFN-γ were analyzed as per the method reported by Livak et al. (2001).
Table 3

Primers used in the experiment.

PrimersPrimers sequencesPCR product (base pairs)
ChIL-2-F5′GTGGCTAACTAATCTGCTGTCC3′105 bp
ChIL-2-R5′GTAGGGCTTACAGAAAGGATCAA3′
ChIFN-γ-F5′CAAAGCCGCACATCAAACA3′80 bp
ChIFN-γ-R5′TTTCACCTTCTTCACGCCATC3′
GAPDH-F5′AGAACATCATCCCAGCGT3′133 bp
GAPDH-R5′CGGCAGGTCAGGTCAACA3′
Primers used in the experiment.

Evaluation of Immune Protective Efficacy

The protective efficacies were evaluated based on calculating the body weight gain (BWG), lesion scores in ceca, and oocyst decrease ratio from chickens in each group. Chickens randomly selected from each group (n = 10) were weighed both before challenge and on day 7 post infection (PI) to record the BWG. Ten chickens from each group were selected to assess lesions in the ceca on day 7 PI as per the method reported by Johnson and Reid (1970). Feces from 10 chickens housed in 10 individual cages in each group were collected between day 7 and 11 PI and weighed, and oocyst counting and calculation of the oocyst decrease ratio were carried out as described in a previous report (Ma et al., 2011).

Statistics Analysis

Data were expressed as means ± SD and subjected to one-way analysis of variance. Differences between mean values were compared by analysis of variance Tukey multiple comparison procedures. Results were considered significant at P<0.05 and highly significant at P<0.01.

Results

Construction of Recombinant Plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NA3-1E-CWA

The objective 1,071 bp fragment approximately equal to target fusion protein and NA3-1E (Figure 1) was generated from plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA after digestion with Nco I and Kpn I (Figure 2). The plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was electroporated into E. faecalis MDXEF-1, and the positive bacteria MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was screened and characterized.
Figure 2

Identification of plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. The recombinant positive plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was identified by digestion with NcoⅠ and Kpn Ⅰ, and an expected 1,071 bp fragment was observed. (M) DNA Marker (DL 5000). Lane (1) Fragment of pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA disgested by Nco Ⅰ and Kpn Ⅰ. Lane (2), (3), and (4) Fragment of pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA digested by Nco Ⅰ, BamH Ⅰ, and Kpn Ⅰ, respectively.

Identification of plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. The recombinant positive plasmid pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was identified by digestion with NcoⅠ and Kpn Ⅰ, and an expected 1,071 bp fragment was observed. (M) DNA Marker (DL 5000). Lane (1) Fragment of pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA disgested by Nco Ⅰ and Kpn Ⅰ. Lane (2), (3), and (4) Fragment of pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA digested by Nco Ⅰ, BamH Ⅰ, and Kpn Ⅰ, respectively.

Protein Expression Assays and Immunoblotting Analysis

The cell wall–anchored fusion protein was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and the expression of target protein was detected by Western blot. The band corresponding to SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E was observed (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Western blot detection of cell wall–anchored fusion protein SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E. Target fusion protein SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with rabbit anti-3-1E polyclonal antibodies (Ma et al., 2011). The expected band corresponding to SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E (53 kDa, A) and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E (55 kDa, B) was observed. (A) Lane (1) and (3) cell wall–anchored fusion protein SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. Lane (2) cell wall–anchored fusion protein from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (negative control). (B) Lane (1) and (3) cell wall–anchored fusion protein SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. Lane (2), cell wall-anchored fusion protein from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (negative control).

Western blot detection of cell wall–anchored fusion protein SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E. Target fusion protein SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with rabbit anti-3-1E polyclonal antibodies (Ma et al., 2011). The expected band corresponding to SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E (53 kDa, A) and SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E (55 kDa, B) was observed. (A) Lane (1) and (3) cell wall–anchored fusion protein SP-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. Lane (2) cell wall–anchored fusion protein from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (negative control). (B) Lane (1) and (3) cell wall–anchored fusion protein SP-DCpep-linker-TrxA-His6-NAΔ3-1E from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA. Lane (2), cell wall-anchored fusion protein from nisin-induced MDXEF-1/pTX8048 (negative control).

Humoral Immune Responses Induced by E.faecalis Expressing DCpep-NAΔ3-1E Protein

On day 14 after each immunization, the specific IgG levels in serum (Figure 4A) and secreted IgA (sIgA) levels in cecal lavage fluid (Figure 4B) from chickens in the groups immunized with 3-1-expressing E. faecalis MDXEF-1 were all highly significantly higher than that in the PBS and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 group (P<0.01). On day 14 after secondary and third immunization, sIgA levels in cecal lavage fluid from chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA were higher than in chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (P<0.05).
Figure 4

(A)The IgG levels in serum and (B) secreted IgA levels in cecal lavage fluid from chickens immunized with 3-1-expressing Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1. On day 5 to 7, 21 to 23, and 37 to 39, chickens in each group were orally inoculated with 5 × 109 CFU live bacteria of MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (pH7.2), respectively. The sera and cecal lavage fluid were prepared from chickens (n = 5) in each group after 3 immunizations. Specific IgG levels in serum and secreted IgA levels in cecal lavage fluid were determined by indirect ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.01.

(A)The IgG levels in serum and (B) secreted IgA levels in cecal lavage fluid from chickens immunized with 3-1-expressing Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1. On day 5 to 7, 21 to 23, and 37 to 39, chickens in each group were orally inoculated with 5 × 109 CFU live bacteria of MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (pH7.2), respectively. The sera and cecal lavage fluid were prepared from chickens (n = 5) in each group after 3 immunizations. Specific IgG levels in serum and secreted IgA levels in cecal lavage fluid were determined by indirect ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.01.

Cellular Immune Responses Induced by E. faecalis Expressing DCpep-NAΔ3-1E Protein

On day 14 after tertiary oral immunization, the percentage of CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood from chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was significantly higher than that of chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (P<0.05), and both of the aforementioned 2 groups were highly significantly higher than the group immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (P<0.01). Significant change was not observed between the MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS group (Figure 5). On day 14 after tertiary oral immunization, the percentage of CD8α+ T cells in peripheral blood from chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA was significantly higher than that in the group immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (P<0.05), and the MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS groups did not show significant change (Figure 5).
Figure 5

The percentage of CD4+ and CD8α+ T cells in peripheral blood from chickens immunized with 3-1-expressing Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1. After 3 oral immunizations with 5 × 109 CFU live bacteria of MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (pH7.2) (control group), lymphocytes in peripheral blood from chickens (n = 5) in each immunized group were isolated by lymphocyte separation medium as per the manufacturer's instruction. The isolated cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated mouse anti-chicken CD4+ antibody (0.5 mg/mL) and phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-chicken CD8α+ antibody (0.5 mg/mL) (Southern Biotech). The relative quantification of T lymphocytes subtypes were measured by flow cytometry (Epics XL MCL, Beckman Coulter). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.01.

The percentage of CD4+ and CD8α+ T cells in peripheral blood from chickens immunized with 3-1-expressing Enterococcus faecalis MDXEF-1. After 3 oral immunizations with 5 × 109 CFU live bacteria of MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (pH7.2) (control group), lymphocytes in peripheral blood from chickens (n = 5) in each immunized group were isolated by lymphocyte separation medium as per the manufacturer's instruction. The isolated cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated mouse anti-chicken CD4+ antibody (0.5 mg/mL) and phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-chicken CD8α+ antibody (0.5 mg/mL) (Southern Biotech). The relative quantification of T lymphocytes subtypes were measured by flow cytometry (Epics XL MCL, Beckman Coulter). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗P<0.05, ∗∗P<0.01.

Cytokine mRNA Expression in the Spleen

On day 14 after tertiary oral immunization, the mRNA expression levels of ChIL-2 and ChIFN-γ in the spleen of chickens in the groups immunized with 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis MDXEF-1 were highly significantly higher than those of chickens in the MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS groups (P<0.01). The mRNA expression levels of ChIFN-γ in the spleen of chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-CWA were significantly higher than those in chickens immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA (P<0.05) (Figure 6).
Figure 6

The mRNA expression levels of ChIFN-γ and ChIL-2 in spleen of chickens. On day 5 to 7, 21 to 23, and 37 to 39, chickens in each group were orally immunized with 5 × 109 CFU live bacteria of MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (pH7.2), respectively. After 3 immunizations, the mRNA expression levels of ChIFN-γ and ChIL-2 in spleen of chickens (n = 5) was assayed by real-time PCR. The cytokine mRNA levels of individual chicken in each group were divided by mRNA levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of the same chicken to normalize the relative mRNA levels of ChIL-2 and ChIFN-γ. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

The mRNA expression levels of ChIFN-γ and ChIL-2 in spleen of chickens. On day 5 to 7, 21 to 23, and 37 to 39, chickens in each group were orally immunized with 5 × 109 CFU live bacteria of MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA, MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-3-1E-CWA, and MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS (pH7.2), respectively. After 3 immunizations, the mRNA expression levels of ChIFN-γ and ChIL-2 in spleen of chickens (n = 5) was assayed by real-time PCR. The cytokine mRNA levels of individual chicken in each group were divided by mRNA levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of the same chicken to normalize the relative mRNA levels of ChIL-2 and ChIFN-γ. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

Protection Offered by Oral Immunization With 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis

No chickens died from E. tenella challenge in each group. Body weight gain, average lesion scores in cecum, and oocyst decrease ratio are shown in Table 4. Body weight gain of chickens (group 1 and 2) immunized with 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis MDXEF-1 was highly significantly higher than that of chickens in the MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS groups (P<0.01). Chickens in group 1 and 2 displayed lower cecal lesion scores, lower oocyst shedding, and higher oocyst decrease ratio compared with chickens in the MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS groups (P<0.01). Statistical differences for immune protections were not observed between the two 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis MDXEF-1 groups.
Table 4

Evaluation of protective effects against coccidiosis after immunization with recombinant live Enterococcus faecalis expressing target protein.

GroupsBody weight before challenge (g)Body weight on day 7 after infection (g)Body weight gain (g)Relative body weight gain (%)Average lesion score in cecumOocyst decrease ratio (%)
1564.02 ± 8.27670.77 ± 9.52B106.75 ± 7.17B83.21%1.6 ± 0.54C38.52%
2561.79 ± 7.83660.82 ± 9.88B99.03 ± 4.07B80.57%2.4 ± 0.54C32.09%
3565.03 ± 8.45619.84 ± 11.35C54.81 ± 4.33C57.73%3.0 ± 0.71B11.38%
4562.84 ± 9.72696.42 ± 16.12A133.58 ± 10.75A100%//
5566.09 ± 7.95613.26 ± 8.09C47.17 ± 3.62C45.34%3.6 ± 0.54A0

A-CThe values represent mean ± SD. Highly significant difference (P < 0.01) between numbers are represented with different capital letters.

Note: Chickens randomly selected from each group (n = 10) were weighed both before challenge and on day 7 post infection (PI) to record body weight gain (BWG). Relative BWG was calculated using the following equation: the relative body weight gain = the average BWG of chickens in each group/the average BWG of chickens in unchallenged control group. Ten chickens from each group were selected to assess lesions in ceca on day 7 PI as per the method reported by Johnson and Reid (1970). Feces from 10 chickens housed in 10 individual cages in each group were collected between day 7 and 11 PI and weighed, and oocyst counting and calculation of oocyst decrease ratio were carried on as described in a previous report (Ma et al., 2011). The oocyst decrease ratio was calculated as follows: (the number of oocysts from challenged control chickens − vaccinated chickens)/challenged control chickens × 100%. “/” showed no pathologic lesions in cecum, and no oocyst was observed.

No significant difference (P > 0.05) between numbers are represented with the same letter. Group 1 were immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NA3-1E-CWA, group 2 with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NA3-1E-CWA, and group 3 with MDXEF-1/pTX8048, orally with a 100 μL volume containing 5 × 109 CFU recombinant bacteria on 3 consecutive day at 2-wk intervals for a total of 3 immunizations. Chickens in the unchallenged control group 4 and challenged control group 5 were both sham inoculated orally with 100 μL PBS (pH 7.2).

Evaluation of protective effects against coccidiosis after immunization with recombinant live Enterococcus faecalis expressing target protein. A-CThe values represent mean ± SD. Highly significant difference (P < 0.01) between numbers are represented with different capital letters. Note: Chickens randomly selected from each group (n = 10) were weighed both before challenge and on day 7 post infection (PI) to record body weight gain (BWG). Relative BWG was calculated using the following equation: the relative body weight gain = the average BWG of chickens in each group/the average BWG of chickens in unchallenged control group. Ten chickens from each group were selected to assess lesions in ceca on day 7 PI as per the method reported by Johnson and Reid (1970). Feces from 10 chickens housed in 10 individual cages in each group were collected between day 7 and 11 PI and weighed, and oocyst counting and calculation of oocyst decrease ratio were carried on as described in a previous report (Ma et al., 2011). The oocyst decrease ratio was calculated as follows: (the number of oocysts from challenged control chickens − vaccinated chickens)/challenged control chickens × 100%. “/” showed no pathologic lesions in cecum, and no oocyst was observed. No significant difference (P > 0.05) between numbers are represented with the same letter. Group 1 were immunized with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-NA3-1E-CWA, group 2 with MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NA3-1E-CWA, and group 3 with MDXEF-1/pTX8048, orally with a 100 μL volume containing 5 × 109 CFU recombinant bacteria on 3 consecutive day at 2-wk intervals for a total of 3 immunizations. Chickens in the unchallenged control group 4 and challenged control group 5 were both sham inoculated orally with 100 μL PBS (pH 7.2).

Discussion

Avian coccidiosis is responsible for serious annual economic losses in the world poultry industries (Chapman et al., 2013). Currently, the defects such as emergence of drug-resistant Eimeria species, drug residues, and virulence reversion of commercial vaccines accompanied by application of traditional measures including anticoccidial drugs and anticoccidia attenuated live vaccine against coccidiosis could not be avoided. Novel commercial vaccines without obvious drawbacks aiming at effectively preventing and controlling coccidiosis are still at the exploring stage (Blake et al., 2014). We previously constructed 3 kinds of live Lactococci expressing E. tenella 3-1E protein (Ma et al., 2013, Ma et al., 2017) and E. tenella AMA1 protein (Li et al., 2018), and the results showed that recombinant live Lactococci expressing target protein provided partial immune protections against E. tenella challenge. Furthermore, our previous research also proved that the surface-anchored Eimeria 3-1E protein delivered by L. lacits can induce more protective immunity and protection than the secreted or cytoplasmic 3-1E protein (Ma et al., 2017). In the present study, we focus on the symbiotic bacteria E. faecalis strain (MDXEF-1), which was isolated from the chicken intestinal tract and characterized to be a delivery tool to express E. tenella 3-1E protein (data not published). Will the surface anchored E. tenella 3-1E protein delivered by E. faecalis MDXEF-1 enhance the immune protection against homologous challenge? To answer the previous question, we first constructed recombinant E. faecalis expressing cell wall-anchored E. tenella 3-1E protein based on our previous research. The results from oral immunization and challenge showed that the levels of sera IgG, secretory IgA (sIgA) in cecal lavage, proportion of CD4+ cells in peripheral blood, and mRNA expression levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ in spleen from chickens in the MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-NAΔ3-1E-CWA group were significantly higher than those in the MDXEF-1/pTX8048 and PBS group (P < 0.05), suggesting that target 3-1E protein delivered by symbiotic bacteria E. faecalis MDXEF-1 induced effective humoral and cellular immunity. Previous studies have demonstrated that DC-targeting 12-mer peptide (DCpep) selected from a phage display library enhanced the uptake of the target antigen by intestinal DC, then produced a stronger specific immune responses, and therefore provided more efficient protection against pathogens such as Bacillus anthracis and NDV (Mohamadzadeh et al., 2009, Jiang et al., 2015). Will DCpep fused with E. tenella 3-1E protein enhances the immunogenicity of the target protein? Therefore, in the present study, the surface expression system of E. faecalis MDXEF-1 was further modified by fusing DCpep to E. tenella 3-1E protein encoding gene, and the recombinant E. faecalis MDXEF-1/pTX8048-SP-DCpep-3-1E-CWA displaying cell wall-anchored DCpep-NAΔ3-1E fusion protein was constructed with expection of enhancing the immunogenicity of target 3-1E protein. The expected results in this study were observed, showing the humoral and cellular immunity induced by recombinant E. faecalis MDXEF-1 expressing Dcpep-NAΔ3-1E fusion protein was higher than that expressing NAΔ3-1E (P < 0.05), demonstrating DCpep effectively enhanced the immunity elicited by NAΔ3-1E protein through elevating the levels of IgG in sera and IgA in in cecal lavage, increasing CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subtypes, and improving relative expression of mRNA levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ in spleen. It was generally accepted that both cellular and humoral immunity plays an important role against Eimeria challenge (Lillehoj, 1998, Wallach, 2010). The previous expected results could be explained by the fact that DCpep displayed on the surface of recombinant-positive E. faecalis specifically binds to the receptor existed on DC surface, and then, fusion protein DCpep-NAΔ3-1E was taken up by DCs and presented on the surface of DC, which further recognize and activate T cells to initiate effective immune responses, and meanwhile, the secretion of key cytokines from activated T cells indirectly modulate the function of immune cells (Curiel et al., 2004, Subramaniam et al., 2017). Accordingly, the enhanced immune responses from chickens in the group orally immunized with E. faecalis expressing DCpep-NAΔ3-1E generated more immune efficacy against homologous challenge, which were reflected by significant improved BWG, increased oocyst decrease ratio, and reduced average lesion scores in cecum compared with live E. faecalis expressing NAΔ3-1E protein. The pathologic lesions in cecum of chickens immunized with the two 3-1E-expressing E. faecalis, especially DCpep-NAΔ3-1E-expressing bacteria were relatively slight compared with the control group, which suggesting the enhanced immunity based on DCpep reduced the cecal general and histopathologic changes caused by Eimeria.

Conclusion

Overall, oral immunization to chickens with recombinant live E. faecalis expressing E. tenella 3-1E protein elicited systemic immune responses and offered protective efficacy against homologous challenge. The induced immunity and protection could be enhanced by fusing DCpep with target 3-1E protein. The recombinant bacteria expressing DCpep and interested protein using intestinal symbiotic bacteria as delivery tool could be a potential approach for prevention of Eimeria infection.
  28 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Immunomodulatory dendritic cells in intestinal lamina propria.

Authors:  Fernando G Chirdo; Owain R Millington; Helen Beacock-Sharp; Allan McI Mowat
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens.

Authors:  J Johnson; W M Reid
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 2.011

Review 4.  Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development.

Authors:  Rami A Dalloul; Hyun S Lillehoj
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.217

5.  Evaluation of immune protective efficacies of Eimeria tenella EtMic1 polypeptides with different domain recombination displayed on yeast surface.

Authors:  Peipei Chen; Junfeng Lv; Jie Zhang; Hui Sun; Zhengtao Chen; Hongmei Li; Fangkun Wang; Xiaomin Zhao
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.011

6.  Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge.

Authors:  Miranda M Ritzi; Wael Abdelrahman; Michaela Mohnl; Rami A Dalloul
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge.

Authors:  M Mohamadzadeh; T Duong; S J Sandwick; T Hoover; T R Klaenhammer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Recombinant lactococcus lactis expressing Eimeria tenella AMA1 protein and its immunological effects against homologous challenge.

Authors:  Jian Li; Fen Wang; Chunli Ma; Yuchen Huang; Dian Wang; Dexing Ma
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.011

Review 9.  Challenges in the successful control of the avian coccidia.

Authors:  Martin W Shirley; Adrian L Smith; Damer P Blake
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  A selective review of advances in coccidiosis research.

Authors:  H David Chapman; John R Barta; Damer Blake; Arthur Gruber; Mark Jenkins; Nicholas C Smith; Xun Suo; Fiona M Tomley
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.870

View more
  4 in total

1.  Probiotics Surface-Delivering Fiber2 Protein of Fowl Adenovirus 4 Stimulate Protective Immunity Against Hepatitis-Hydropericardium Syndrome in Chickens.

Authors:  Zhipeng Jia; Xinghui Pan; Wenjing Zhi; Hang Chen; Bingrong Bai; Chunli Ma; Dexing Ma
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Immune Evaluation of Recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum With Surface Display of HA1-DCpep in Mice.

Authors:  Hui Niu; Jun-Hong Xing; Bo-Shi Zou; Chun-Wei Shi; Hai-Bin Huang; Yan-Long Jiang; Jian-Zhong Wang; Xin Cao; Nan Wang; Yan Zeng; Wen-Tao Yang; Gui-Lian Yang; Chun-Feng Wang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Designing multiepitope-based vaccine against Eimeria from immune mapped protein 1 (IMP-1) antigen using immunoinformatic approach.

Authors:  Thabile Madlala; Victoria T Adeleke; Abiodun J Fatoba; Moses Okpeku; Adebayo A Adeniyi; Matthew A Adeleke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Protective Immunity Induced by an Eimeria tenella Whole Sporozoite Vaccine Elicits Specific B-Cell Antigens.

Authors:  Marco A Juárez-Estrada; Amanda Gayosso-Vázquez; Guillermo Tellez-Isaias; Rogelio A Alonso-Morales
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.