| Literature DB >> 32475422 |
K Liu1, Y Y Wen1, H H Liu1, H Y Cao1, X Y Dong1, H G Mao1, Z Z Yin2.
Abstract
Reproduction trait is one of the most important economic traits in poultry industry. This study was aimed to investigate the mRNA expression levels, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of POMC gene, and the association with reproduction traits in chickens. Five SNP (g.958 G > A, g.1374 G > C, g.1393 G > A, g.1817 C > T, and g.1918G > A) were detected in introns of POMC gene in 317 Zhenning yellow chickens. Association analysis revealed that g.958 G > A and g.1817 C > T showed significantly associations with fertilization rate, hatching rate of hatching eggs, and hatching rate of fertilized eggs in chickens. Simultaneously, g.1374 G > C and g.1918G > A were both associated with egg weight at 300 D of age (P < 0.05). The SNP of g.958 G > A, g.1393 G > A, and g.1817 C > T were all associated with E2 hormone levels (P < 0.05). The result of mRNA expression levels in different tissues showed that POMC mRNA expression level in the pituitary was higher than those in the other tissues and varied in different genotypes. In conclusion, the results in this study provided new evidences that polymorphisms of the POMC gene have potential effects on reproduction traits in chickens. The 5 SNP detected in this study could be potential markers for improving reproduction traits in chickens.Entities:
Keywords: POMC; chicken; expression; polymorphisms; reproduction traits
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32475422 PMCID: PMC7597669 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Primer sequences used for amplification of POMC gene.
| Primers | Sequences (5′-3′) | Tm(°C) | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| POMC1-F | TCTCCAAGGGCCATCCAGAG | 59.5 | 1,748 |
| POMC1-R | TCCCTGATTTCCTGGTTTGTC | 55.6 | |
| POMC2-F | AGGCGGAGTGATACCTTGAGC | 59.5 | 984 |
| POMC2-R | CTTCCCTTCCTCTCGTTCCA | 57.4 | |
| POMC3-F | GGAGAGCATCCGCAAGTACG | 59.5 | |
| POMC3-R | TTGGGAGTAACCTATGCTGAAGT | 56.0 | 1,275 |
| POMC4-F | GCTGCCAACCTCCATACCTAATAC | 59.6 | |
| POMC4-R | TGTCATGTAATCCGGGTTTAGG | 55.8 | 1,472 |
Owing to the complexity of POMC gene, fragments were divided into 4 segments in the sequencing process and primers were designed respectively.
Primers used for real-time quantitative PCR of POMC gene.
| Primers | Sequences (5′-3′) | Tm (°C) | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| POMC-F | GGAGAACAGCAAGTGCCAGGAC | 59 | 53 |
| POMC-R | CACACGCCAAAACACCAGCC | 59 | |
| β-Actin-F | TGCTGTGTTCCCATCTATCG | 60 | 150 |
| β-Actin-R | TTGGTGACAATACCGTGTT | 60 |
Genotypes and allele frequencies and diversity parameters of SNP in POMC gene.
| SNP | Genotype frequencies( | Allelic frequencies | Genetic polymorphism | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | AB | BB | A | B | |||||
| g.958 G > A | 0.57 (181) | 0.35 (112) | 0.08 (24) | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 1.61 |
| g.1374 G > C | 0.62 (197) | 0.30 (96) | 0.08 (24) | 0.77 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 1.54 |
| g.1393 G > A | 0.75 (240) | 0.20 (62) | 0.05 (15) | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 1.33 |
| g.1817 C > T | 0.08 (190) | 0.30 (102) | 0.62 (25) | 0.23 | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 1.55 |
| g.1918G > A | 0.61 (194) | 0.31 (97) | 0.08 (26) | 0.77 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 1.56 |
Abbreviation: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Numbers in parentheses indicated the number of individuals.
PIC: polymorphism information content.
He: gene heterozygosity.
Ne: effective number of alleles.
The test of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P-value> 0.05 suggested the population conforms to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Association analysis of SNP in POMC gene with reproduction traits (mean ± SE).
| SNP | Genotypes ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g.958 G > A | GG (181) | 53.37 ± 0.403 | 86.93 ± 0.227 | 95.99 ± 0.95a | 88.35 ± 1.52A,a | 91.80 ± 1.42a |
| GA (112) | 53.26 ± 0.563 | 86.96 ± 0.295 | 90.85 ± 1.90b | 79.84 ± 2.71B,b | 86.09 ± 2.53b | |
| AA (24) | 53.75 ± 1.250 | 87.17 ± 0.726 | 90.28 ± 3.61a,b | 77.08 ± 5.57b | 86.81 ± 5.40a,b | |
| g.1374 G > C | GG (197) | 52.87 ± 0.393b | 87.04 ± 0.220 | 92.51 ± 1.29 | 83.04 ± 1.83 | 88.79 ± 1.72 |
| GC (96) | 54.43 ± 0.605a | 86.66 ± 0.325 | 95.75 ± 1.32 | 86.20 ± 2.41 | 89.58 ± 2.20 | |
| CC (24) | 53.13 ± 1.077a,b | 87.50 ± 0.626 | 95.83 ± 2.30 | 89.58 ± 3.45 | 93.75 ± 2.98 | |
| g.1393 G > A | GG (240) | 53.46 ± 0.362 | 87.00 ± 0.200 | 94.17 ± 0.97 | 85.17 ± 1.53 | 90.17 ± 1.40 |
| GA (62) | 53.62 ± 0.745 | 86.98 ± 0.398 | 93.28 ± 2.24 | 84.27 ± 3.34 | 88.98 ± 3.11 | |
| AA (15) | 53.15 ± 1.447 | 86.13 ± 0.861 | 88.89 ± 7.03 | 74.44 ± 7.61 | 78.89 ± 7.88 | |
| g.1817 C > T | CC (26) | 52.50 ± 1.047 | 86.42 ± 0.800 | 85.90 ± 5.82b | 74.36 ± 6.62b | 80.77 ± 6.65b |
| CT (96) | 53.44 ± 0.594 | 86.66 ± 0.302 | 94.62 ± 1.38a | 84.37 ± 2.38a,b | 88.98 ± 2.08a,b | |
| TT (195) | 52.44 ± 0.403 | 87.18 ± 0.217 | 94.36 ± 1.06a | 85.90 ± 1.68a | 90.77 ± 1.57a | |
| g.1918G > A | GG (194) | 53.09 ± 0.413b | 86.89 ± 0.228 | 94.76 ± 1.11 | 85.44 ± 1.77 | 89.48 ± 1.66 |
| GA (97) | 53.30 ± 0.553a,b | 86.88 ± 0.320 | 92.35 ± 1.63 | 83.08 ± 2.44 | 89.78 ± 2.14 | |
| AA (26) | 55.58 ± 1.050a | 87.77 ± 0.465 | 91.35 ± 4.30 | 82.69 ± 5.17 | 87.50 ± 5.13 |
a,b,A,BMeans of different genotypes at the same locus with the different uppercase letters were extremely significant (P < 0.01), and the different lowercase letters was significant (P < 0.05); The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05).
Means without superscript was not significant (P > 0.05).
Numbers in parentheses indicated the number of individuals.
Abbreviation: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
EW300 = egg weight at 300d of age.
E300 = egg production at 300d of age.
FR = fertilization rate.
HEHR = hatching rate of hatching eggs.
FEHR = hatching rate of fertilized eggs.
Association analysis of SNP in POMC gene with reproductive hormone levels in chickens (mean ± SE).
| SNP | Genotypes | FSH(U/L) | LH (ng/L) | PRL (ng/L) | E2 (pmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g.958 G > A | GG (32) | 13.32 ± 1.47 | 47.63 ± 1.51 | 151.56 ± 21.43 | 78.81 ± 3.18a |
| GA (21) | 10.69 ± 0.92 | 44.57 ± 1.41 | 106.18 ± 11.39 | 65.73 ± 5.41b | |
| AA (2) | 9.48 ± 1.72 | 36.48 ± 3.60 | 94.70 ± 20.35 | 78.78 ± 3.04a,b | |
| g.1374 G > C | GG (34) | 12.70 ± 1.28 | 45.23 ± 1.37 | 141.87 ± 19.67 | 74.46 ± 3.70 |
| GC (17) | 11.65 ± 1.60 | 47.52 ± 1.84 | 112.25 ± 16.76 | 73.88 ± 5.06 | |
| CC (4) | 9.96 ± 1.50 | 46.82 ± 5.33 | 134.32 ± 40.06 | 68.01 ± 13.05 | |
| g.1393 G > A | GG (37) | 11.56 ± 1.03 | 45.46 ± 1.34 | 125.40 ± 13.88 | 69.97 ± 3.71b |
| GA (16) | 13.18 ± 2.08 | 47.28 ± 2.05 | 139.49 ± 32.02 | 79.18 ± 3.85a,b | |
| AA (2) | 15.50 ± 6.18 | 47.28 ± 0.14 | 198.66 ± 113.27 | 101.97 ± 7.18a | |
| g.1817 C > T | CC (7) | 9.42 ± 0.62 | 49.44 ± 3.84 | 77.99 ± 9.62 | 58.16 ± 7.04b |
| CT (12) | 14.68 ± 2.32 | 47.40 ± 2.18 | 154.79 ± 30.85 | 69.79 ± 6.31a,b | |
| TT (36) | 11.88 ± 1.17 | 44.95 ± 1.28 | 135.15 ± 17.44 | 78.20 ± 3.41a | |
| g.1918G > A | GG (39) | 12.80 ± 1.23 | 46.51 ± 1.39 | 140.20 ± 17.57 | 74.32 ± 3.37 |
| GA (12) | 10.62 ± 0.99 | 43.69 ± 1.29 | 101.43 ± 13.60 | 67.12 ± 6.75 | |
| AA (4) | 10.69 ± 3.72 | 48.69 ± 1.85 | 146.02 ± 59.96 | 88.93 ± 4.84 |
a,b,A,BMeans of different genotypes at the same locus with the different uppercase letters were extremely significant (P < 0.01), and the different lowercase letters was significant (P < 0.05); The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05).
Means without superscript was not significant (P > 0.05).
Abbreviations: E2, estradiol; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; PRL, prolactin; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Figure 1Relative expression levels of the POMC gene in different tissues of chickens. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with β-actin mRNA. Data represent mean ± SD. Bars with different lowercase letters were significantly different (P < 0.05). The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05). Means without lowercase was not significant (P > 0.05). LWF, large and white follicle; SYF, small and yellow follicle.
Figure 2Relative expression of the POMC gene in the pituitary tissue according to genotype in g.958 G > A in chickens. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with β-actin mRNA. Data represent mean ± SD. Bars with different lowercase letters were significantly different (P < 0.05). The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05). Means without lowercase was not significant (P > 0.05).
Figure 3Relative expression of the POMC gene in the pituitary tissue according to genotype in g.1374 G > C in chickens. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with β-actin mRNA. Data represent mean ± SD. Bars with different lowercase letters were significantly different (P < 0.05). The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05). Means without lowercase was not significant (P > 0.05).
Figure 4Relative expression of the POMC gene in the pituitary tissue according to genotype in g.1393 G > A in chickens. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with β-actin mRNA. Data represent mean ± SD. Bars with different lowercase letters were significantly different (P < 0.05). The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05). Means without lowercase was not significant (P > 0.05).
Figure 5Relative expression of the POMC gene in the pituitary tissue according to genotype in g.1817 C > Tin chickens. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with β-actin mRNA. Data represent mean ± SD. Bars with different lowercase letters were significantly different (P < 0.05). The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05). Means without lowercase was not significant (P > 0.05).
Figure 6Relative expression of the POMC gene in the pituitary tissue according to genotype in g.1918G > A in chickens. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with β-actin mRNA. Data represent mean ± SD. Bars with different lowercase letters were significantly different (P < 0.05).The difference between the same letters was not significant (P > 0.05). Means without lowercase was not significant (P > 0.05).