Literature DB >> 32475275

Incremental inputs improve the automated detection of implant loosening using machine-learning algorithms.

Romil F Shah1,2, Stefano A Bini2, Alejandro M Martinez3, Valentina Pedoia3, Thomas P Vail2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of a machine-learning algorithm to diagnose prosthetic loosening from preoperative radiographs and to investigate the inputs that might improve its performance.
METHODS: A group of 697 patients underwent a first-time revision of a total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at our institution between 2012 and 2018. Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, and historical and comorbidity information were collected from their electronic records. Each patient was defined as having loose or fixed components based on the operation notes. We trained a series of convolutional neural network (CNN) models to predict a diagnosis of loosening at the time of surgery from the preoperative radiographs. We then added historical data about the patients to the best performing model to create a final model and tested it on an independent dataset.
RESULTS: The convolutional neural network we built performed well when detecting loosening from radiographs alone. The first model built de novo with only the radiological image as input had an accuracy of 70%. The final model, which was built by fine-tuning a publicly available model named DenseNet, combining the AP and lateral radiographs, and incorporating information from the patient's history, had an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.3%, 70.2%, and 95.6% on the independent test dataset. It performed better for cases of revision THA with an accuracy of 90.1%, than for cases of revision TKA with an accuracy of 85.8%.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that machine learning can detect prosthetic loosening from radiographs. Its accuracy is enhanced when using highly trained public algorithms, and when adding clinical data to the algorithm. While this algorithm may not be sufficient in its present state of development as a standalone metric of loosening, it is currently a useful augment for clinical decision making. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):101-106.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image recognition; Implant loosening; Machine-learning; Neural network; Revision joint arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32475275     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1577.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  9 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgery: evolution, current state and future directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Kurmis; Jamie R Ianunzio
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Application of deep learning algorithm in automated identification of knee arthroplasty implants from plain radiographs using transfer learning models: Are algorithms better than humans?

Authors:  Anjali Tiwari; Amit Kumar Yadav; Vaibhav Bagaria
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  A novel image-based machine learning model with superior accuracy and predictability for knee arthroplasty loosening detection and clinical decision making.

Authors:  Lawrence Chun Man Lau; Elvis Chun Sing Chui; Gene Chi Wai Man; Ye Xin; Kevin Ki Wai Ho; Kyle Ka Kwan Mak; Michael Tim Yun Ong; Sheung Wai Law; Wing Hoi Cheung; Patrick Shu Hang Yung
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.889

4.  Assessment of Extractability and Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Data for Joint Implant Registries.

Authors:  Nicholas J Giori; John Radin; Alison Callahan; Jason A Fries; Eni Halilaj; Christopher Ré; Scott L Delp; Nigam H Shah; Alex H S Harris
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in arthroplasty.

Authors:  Glen Purnomo; Seng-Jin Yeo; Ming Han Lincoln Liow
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in knee arthroplasty: current concept of the available clinical applications.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Jobe Shatrov; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Parratte; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-05-02

7.  Potential benefits, unintended consequences, and future roles of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery research : a call to emphasize data quality and indications.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Melissa Orr; Viktor Krebs; Mohit Bhandari; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-01

8.  Automatic Identification of Failure in Hip Replacement: An Artificial Intelligence Approach.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Francesco Manlio Gambaro; Katia Chiappetta; Guido Grappiolo; Anna Maria Bianchi; Valentina D A Corino
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 9.  The current role of the virtual elements of artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-07-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.