Literature DB >> 32473794

Dentist-Patient Communication of Treatment Outcomes in Periodontal Practice: A Need for Dental Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Archontia Palaiologou1, Georgios A Kotsakis2.   

Abstract

Periodontal practice has made tremendous progress toward evidence-based treatment over the past decade. Importantly, a new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant treatments has recently been devised that is incorporating current evidence and enabling patient-specific periodontal care. However, this important progress can be further accelerated with the availability of patient-perceived outcomes of periodontal and implant interventions. The majority of existing clinical studies assess treatment effects based on clinician-measured surrogate outcomes, such as probing depth and attachment levels which are easily communicated to or perceived by dental patients. As dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) gain momentum in dental practice, our understanding of the true outcome of dental therapies is vastly increasing. In periodontal research in particular, the utilization of dPROs has clearly demonstrated that periodontal disease contributes to an individual's burden of disease in a substantial manner. Correspondingly, disease treatment interventions seem to lead to varying levels of patient-perceived improvements. The present editorial aims to highlight the importance of patient communication of treatment outcomes in periodontal and implant research and to review the information on available measures for capturing dPROs.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based dentistry; Oral health–related quality of life; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient-reported outcomes; Periodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32473794     DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract        ISSN: 1532-3382            Impact factor:   5.267


  8 in total

1.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE AND SCORING OF ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE VERSIONS.

Authors:  M T John; M Omara; N Su; T List; S Sekulic; B Häggman-Henrikson; C M Visscher; K Bekes; D R Reissmann; K Baba; O Schierz; N Theis-Mahon; K Fueki; T Stamm; L Bondemark; I Oghli; A van Wijk; P Larsson
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.267

2.  Self-reported halitosis and associated factors among older adults: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laura Barreto Moreno; Paulo Roberto Graffiti Colussi; Milena Giotti Marostega; Nathália Prigol Rosalen; Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing; Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  STANDARDIZATION OF DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT USING OHIP-5 - VALIDATION OF "RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE AND SCORING OF ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE VERSIONS".

Authors:  M T John
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Frequency of Four-dimensional Oral Health Problems across Dental Fields - a Comparative Survey of Slovenian and International Dentists.

Authors:  Stella Sekulić; Mike T John; Katrin Bekes; Mohammad H Al-Harthy; Ambra Michelotti; Daniel R Reissmann; Julijana Nikolovska; Sahityaveera Sanivarapu; Folake B Lawal; Thomas List; Asja Čelebić; Ljiljana Strajnić; Rodrigo Casassus; Kazuyoshi Baba; Martin Schimmel; Ama Amuasi; Ruwan D Jayasinghe; Sanela Strujić-Porović; Christopher C Peck; Han Xie; Karina Haugaard Bendixen; Miguel Angel Simancas-Pallares; Eka Perez-Franco; Mohammad Mehdi Naghibi Sistan; Patricia Valerio; Natalia Letunova; Nazik M Nurelhuda; David W Bartlett; Ikeoluwa A Oluwafemi; Saloua Dghoughi; Joao N Ferreira; Pathamas Chantaracherd; Ksenija Rener-Sitar
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2021-10-20

5.  Should the frequency, severity, or both response scales be used for multi-item dental patient-reported outcome measures?

Authors:  Swaha Pattanaik; Mike T John; Seungwon Chung; San Keller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Health, and Treatment Satisfaction of Orthodontic Retention Patients up to Ten Years after Treatment-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Barbro Fostad Salvesen; Jostein Grytten; Gunnar Rongen; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.

Authors:  Swaha Pattanaik; Mike T John; Seungwon Chung; San Keller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.

Authors:  Stephanie Bela Andela; Ragna Lamprecht; Mike T John; Swaha Pattanaik; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.