Marlene Walden1, Austin Lovenstein2, Amelia Randag3, Sherry Pye4, Brianna Shannon5, Esther Pipkin6, Amy Ramick7, Keri Helmick8, Margaret Strickland9. 1. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States; Pet Partners of Central Arkansas, AR, United States. Electronic address: WaldenM@archildrens.org. 2. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: LovensteinAM@archildrens.org. 3. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: RandagAH@archildrens.org. 4. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: SEPye@uams.edu. 5. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: ShannonB@archildrens.org. 6. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: PipkinER@archildrens.org. 7. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: RamickAL@archildrens.org. 8. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States. Electronic address: helmickkl@archildrens.org. 9. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, AR, United States; Pet Partners of Central Arkansas, AR, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of animal-assisted intervention (AAI) on ambulation, physiologic stability, patient satisfaction, and perceived benefit in hospitalized pediatric heart transplant patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: This pilot study used a two-period, two-sequence cross-over design. Using a convenience sample of heart transplant patients between the ages six and nineteen, each subject participated in one AAI and one non-AAI study session over one week. All study sessions started with an aspect of walking. RESULTS: Three males and two females participated. Average age was 15 years. Subjects walked on average 1906 ft during the AAI session as compared to 1933 ft in the non-AAI session. Subjects spent a longer time (17 min) walking in the AAI session as compared to the non-AAI session (15 min). Blood pressure and respiratory rates remained stable. All subjects reported they liked working with the dog. Eighty percent of subjects actively engaged in physical contact and communication with the dog. No safety-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: AAI may assist adolescent heart transplant patients to be more motivated to participate in therapeutic ambulation when walking with a dog. Further studies are needed to identify successful recruitment strategies in this highly vulnerable patient population. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Many clinical challenges exist in implementing AAI research in the pediatric heart transplant population. A conceptual model is introduced to better understand the methodological challenges of conducting AAI research in the hospital setting. Key components include research, organizational, AAI, subject and time factors.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of animal-assisted intervention (AAI) on ambulation, physiologic stability, patient satisfaction, and perceived benefit in hospitalized pediatric heart transplant patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: This pilot study used a two-period, two-sequence cross-over design. Using a convenience sample of heart transplant patients between the ages six and nineteen, each subject participated in one AAI and one non-AAI study session over one week. All study sessions started with an aspect of walking. RESULTS: Three males and two females participated. Average age was 15 years. Subjects walked on average 1906 ft during the AAI session as compared to 1933 ft in the non-AAI session. Subjects spent a longer time (17 min) walking in the AAI session as compared to the non-AAI session (15 min). Blood pressure and respiratory rates remained stable. All subjects reported they liked working with the dog. Eighty percent of subjects actively engaged in physical contact and communication with the dog. No safety-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS:AAI may assist adolescent heart transplant patients to be more motivated to participate in therapeutic ambulation when walking with a dog. Further studies are needed to identify successful recruitment strategies in this highly vulnerable patient population. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Many clinical challenges exist in implementing AAI research in the pediatric heart transplant population. A conceptual model is introduced to better understand the methodological challenges of conducting AAI research in the hospital setting. Key components include research, organizational, AAI, subject and time factors.
Authors: Mary Lou Jennings; Douglas A Granger; Crystal I Bryce; Denice Twitchell; Kim Yeakel; Patricia A Teaford Journal: Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol Date: 2021-07-31