| Literature DB >> 32472529 |
Kui Li1,2, Renyu Ran1, Zicheng Jiang1,2, Chuanqi Fan1, Tao Li1, Zhiguo Yin3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Immune function imbalance is closely associated with the occurrence and development of infectious diseases. We studied the characteristics of changes in T-lymphocyte subsets and their risk factors in HIV-negative patients with active tuberculosis (ATB).Entities:
Keywords: Proteins; Risk factors; T-lymphocyte subsets; Tuberculosis; X-ray computed tomography
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32472529 PMCID: PMC7395032 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01451-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infection ISSN: 0300-8126 Impact factor: 3.553
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study population. ATB active tuberculosis, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, IGRA interferon gamma release assay, NTM nontuberculous mycobacteria
Demographic and laboratory characteristics of the study participants
| Characteristics | Control group ( | ATB group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Male sex, No. (%) | 39 (69.6) | 217 (78.9) |
| Age, years, M (IQR) | 51 (38–64) | 54 (38–66) |
| At admission | ||
| CD4 T-cell count, cells/μL, M (IQR) | 855.5 (689.8–982.2) | 300.0 (203.0–437.0) |
| CD8 T-cell count, cells/μL, M (IQR) | 560.0 (465.8–730.7) | 250.0 (164.0–378.0) |
| CD4/CD8 ratio, M (IQR) | 1.40 (0.99–1.75) | 1.19 (0.89–1.70) |
| Anti-TB regimen, No. (%) | ||
| H + R + Z + E | NA | 144 (52.4) |
| H + R + Z + E + Lfx/Am | NA | 76 (27.6) |
| H + R + Lfx + Ea | NA | 19 (6.9) |
| R + Z + E + Lfx + Am | NA | 14 (5.1) |
| H + Z + E + Lfx + Am | NA | 12 (4.4) |
| Otherb | NA | 10 (3.6) |
| At the end of the 4th week after anti-TBc | ||
| CD4 T-cell count, cells/μL, M (IQR) | NA | 517.0 (361.3–654.5) |
| CD8 T-cell count, cells/μL, M (IQR) | NA | 367.5 (237.5–555.8) |
| CD4/CD8 ratio, M (IQR) | NA | 1.35 (0.93–1.76) |
Am amikacin, ATB active tuberculosis, E ethambutol, H isoniazid, IQR interquartile range, Lfx levofloxacin, M median, NA not applicable, R rifampicin, TB tuberculosis, Z pyrazinamide
aRegimen used when drug-sensitive patients could not tolerate the side effects of pyrazinamide
bIndividualized treatment for multidrug- or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis
cData from 182 patients who completed re-examination of T-lymphocyte subsets
Fig. 2Comparison of CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts at the time of admission with those of patients in the control group and those of patients after anti-TB treatment (a-c). Correlation analysis of CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts in the ATB group (d). The normal distribution values of CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts were converted using Rankit’s formula; CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts were associated with the extent of the disease as assessed by chest computed tomography (e–g). Comparison of CD4/CD8 ratios in patients with drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB (h). *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. ATB active tuberculosis, BMI body mass index, EDCT extent of the disease as assessed by chest computed tomography, DRTB drug-resistant tuberculosis, DSTB drug-susceptible tuberculosis, TB tuberculosis
Univariate analysis of T-lymphocytes (nominal and ordinal variables)
| Factor | CD4 T-cell count | CD8 T-cell count | CD4/CD8 ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cells/μL, median (IQR) | Cells/μL, median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||||
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | 58 | 322.0 (202.3–464.8) | 0.501 | 253.5 (143.8–387.8) | 0.956 | 1.24 (0.93–1.67) | 0.511 |
| Male | 217 | 288.0 (200.5–436.0) | 249.0 (164.0–377.5) | 1.17 (0.87–1.68) | |||
| Smokinga | |||||||
| No | 104 | 317.0 (210.0–462.8) | 0.208 | 262.0 (176.3–384.3) | 0.168 | 1.23 (0.81–1.65) | 0.666 |
| Yes | 171 | 285.0 (190.0–427.0) | 240.0 (148.0–355.0) | 1.18 (0.90–1.71) | |||
| Dust exposurea | |||||||
| No | 194 | 297.5 (189.0–438.0) | 0.481 | 249.5 (154.0–389.3) | 0.784 | 1.17 (0.85–1.66) | 0.312 |
| Yes | 81 | 302.0 (218.5–441.0) | 259.0 (165.5–344.5) | 1.27 (0.91–1.73) | |||
| Previously treated cases | |||||||
| Nob | 194 | 307.5 (213.0–433.5) | 0.062 | 262.0 (174.0–383.5) | 0.087 | 1.21 (0.90–1.66) | 0.854 |
| Yesc | 81 | 271.0 (153.5–455.0) | 224.0 (133.5–348.0) | 1.17 (0.84–1.80) | |||
| Cavitation | |||||||
| No | 95 | 313.0 (174.0–437.0) | 0.818 | 240.0 (129.0–382.0) | 0.266 | 1.23 (0.95–1.65) | 0.386 |
| Yes | 180 | 290.5 (205.3–442.5) | 252.0 (175.3–377.8) | 1.17 (0.84–1.68) | |||
| Extrapulmonary tuberculosis | |||||||
| No | 227 | 311.0 (203.0–459.0) | 0.069 | 259.0 (166.0–382.0) | 0.140 | 1.19 (0.87–1.70) | 0.897 |
| Yes | 48 | 267.0 (185.8–378.8) | 231.5 (141.8–323.8) | 1.21 (0.93–1.55) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | |||||||
| No | 247 | 309.0 (197.0–445.0) | 0.541 | 250.0 (159.0–377.0) | 0.664 | 1.22 (0.90–1.66) | 0.462 |
| Yes | 28 | 263.5 (207.8–414.8) | 255.0 (185.3–402.0) | 0.97 (0.76–1.73) | |||
| Drug resistant tuberculosis | |||||||
| DSTB | 238 | 297.5 (193.5–439.0) | 0.398 | 256.5 (157.8–382.0) | 0.442 | 1.17 (0.85–1.66) | |
| DRTB | 37 | 316.0 (248.5–447.5) | 221.0 (165.5–358.0) | 1.49 (1.07–1.87) | |||
| Graded | |||||||
| DNA/RNA positive | 57 | 323.0 (213.0–508.0) | 263.0 (169.0–385.5) | 0.152 | 1.18 (0.93–1.67) | 0.771 | |
| + | 15 | 393.0 (168.0–653.0) | 329.0 (213.0–431.0) | 1.17 (0.87–1.60) | |||
| 1 + | 67 | 274.0 (186.0–466.0) | 262.0 (148.0–379.0) | 1.09 (0.78–1.75) | |||
| 2 + | 51 | 331.0 (217.0–437.0) | 240.0 (150.0–343.0) | 1.27 (0.90–1.84) | |||
| 3 + | 55 | 278.0 (158.0–369.0) | 227.0 (147.0–272.0) | 1.29 (0.99–1.79) | |||
| 4 + | 30 | 279.0 (215.5–394.5) | 262.0 (175.5–446.5) | 0.98 (0.74–1.51) | |||
| EDCT | |||||||
| Stage 1 (minimal/mild) | 1 | 538.0 | 945.0 | 0.57 | 0.647 | ||
| Stage 2 (moderate) | 83 | 331.0 (225.0–483.0) | 283.0 (205.0–405.0) | 1.17 (0.89–1.64) | |||
| Stage 3 (advanced) | 191 | 280.0 (174.0–425.0) | 245.0 (148.0–343.0) | 1.24 (0.89–1.71) | |||
Statistically significant associations are marked in bold
DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, DRTB drug-resistant tuberculosis, DSTB drug-susceptible tuberculosis, EDCT extent of the disease as assessed by chest computed tomography, IQR interquartile range, RNA ribonucleic acid
aSmoking or dust exposure for at least 3 months before a diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
bNew cases are defined as patients who had not started anti-TB treatment or had been on anti-TB treatment for < 1 month
cPreviously treated cases are defined as patients who received anti-TB treatment ≥ 1 month in the past
dMycobacterium tuberculosis load grading before treatment
Univariate and multivariate analysis of T-lymphocytes
| Factor | Missing data | Median (interquartile rang)a | CD4 T-cell count | CD8 T-cell count | CD4/CD8 ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | |||||||||
| Drug-resistant tuberculosis | 0 | (00.0) | NA | 0.398 | 0.442 | 0.061 | |||
| Grade | 0 | (00.0) | NA | 0.061 | 0.152 | 0.771 | |||
| EDCT | 0 | (00.0) | NA | 0.628 | 0.134 | 0.647 | |||
| Age, years | 0 | (00.0) | 54.0 (38.0–66.0) | 0.214 | 0.484 | ||||
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 8 | (2.9) | 19.1 (17.5–21.1) | 0.254 | 0.345 | ||||
| Duration of symptoms, days | 2 | (0.7) | 90.0 (30.0–730.0) | 0.149 | 0.260 | 0.102 | |||
| White blood cell, × 109/L | 0 | (00.0) | 6.8 (5.6–8.7) | 0.068 | 0.155 | 0.155 | |||
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 0 | (00.0) | 11.7 (10.4–13.3) | 0.156 | 0.220 | 0.382 | |||
| Platelet, × 109/L | 0 | (00.0) | 260.0 (193.0–337.0) | 0.941 | |||||
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, mm/H | 26 | (9.5) | 52.0 (29.0–75.5) | 0.958 | 0.220 | 0.294 | |||
| Prealbumin, mg/L | 35 | (12.7) | 132.5 (69.3–196.8) | 0.801 | |||||
| Albumin, g/L | 0 | (00.0) | 31.8 (26.6–35.7) | 0.069 | 0.093 | 0.108 | |||
| Globulin, g/L | 3 | (1.1) | 32.6 (28.8–36.4) | 0.940 | 0.759 | 0.426 | |||
| Albumin/globulin ratiod | 3 | (1.1) | 0.9 (0.8–1.2) | ||||||
| Alpha-1 globulin, g/L | 33 | (12.0) | 4.7 (3.6–6.0) | 0.085 | |||||
| Alpha-2 globulin, g/L | 33 | (12.0) | 7.7 (6.4–8.7) | 0.677 | 0.429 | 0.184 | |||
| Beta-1 globulin, g/L | 33 | (12.0) | 3.7 (3.2–4.2) | 0.689 | 0.545 | ||||
| Beta-2 globulin, g/L | 33 | (12.0) | 3.6 (3.1–4.4) | 0.211 | 0.336 | 0.804 | |||
| Gamma globulin, g/L | 33 | (12.0) | 12.6 (10.1–15.3) | 0.378 | 0.517 | 0.789 | |||
Statistically significant associations are marked in bold
EDCT extent of the disease as assessed by chest computed tomography, NA not applicable
aData are presented as the value of the factor
bData are presented as the results of univariate Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient analysis
cData are presented as the results of multivariate optimal scale regression analysis
dThe correlation coefficient with albumin was greater than 0.7; therefore, albumin/globulin ratio was excluded from the multivariate analysis
Fig. 3Correlation analysis of independent risk factors for decreases in CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts. The normal distribution values of CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts were converted using Rankit’s formula. BMI body mass index