Literature DB >> 32472500

Smartphone sensor accuracy varies from device to device in mobile research: The case of spatial orientation.

Tim Kuhlmann1,2, Pablo Garaizar3, Ulf-Dietrich Reips4.   

Abstract

Smartphone usage is increasing around the globe-in daily life and as a research device in behavioral science. Smartphones offer the possibility to gather longitudinal data at little cost to researchers and participants. They provide the option to verify self-report data with data from sensors built into most smartphones. How accurate this sensor data is when gathered via different smartphone devices, e.g., in a typical experience sampling framework, has not been investigated systematically. With the present study, we investigated the accuracy of orientation data about the spatial position of smartphones via a newly invented measurement device, the RollPitcher. Objective status of pitch (vertical orientation) and roll (horizontal orientation) of the smartphone was compared to data gathered from the sensors via web browsers and native apps. Bayesian ANOVAs confirmed that the deviations in pitch and roll differed between smartphone models, with mean inaccuracies per device of up to 2.1° and 6.6°, respectively. The inaccuracies for measurements of roll were higher than for pitch, d = .28, p < .001. Our results confirm the presence of heterogeneities when gathering orientation data from different smartphone devices. In most cases, measurement via a web browser was identical to measurement via a native app, but this was not true for all smartphone devices. As a solution to lack of sensor accuracy, we recommend the development and implementation of a coherent research framework and also discuss the implications of the heterogeneities in orientation data for different research designs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory assessment; Experience sampling; Pitch; Roll; Sensor data; Smartphone; Tilt

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32472500      PMCID: PMC7880912          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01404-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data.

Authors:  Meredith A Case; Holland A Burwick; Kevin G Volpp; Mitesh S Patel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Smartphone Psychology Manifesto.

Authors:  Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05

Review 3.  The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change.

Authors:  Patrick J Curran; Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bert; Marika Giacometti; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.460

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  A Novel Prototype Biosensor Array Electrode System for Detecting the Bacterial Pathogen Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  Palaniappan Ramasamy; Gajalakshmi Dakshinamoorthy; Shanmugam Jayashree; Dhamodharan Prabhu; Sundararaj Rajamanikandan; Palaniyandi Velusamy; Govindan Dayanithi; Robert E B Hanna
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04

Review 2.  Smartphones for musculoskeletal research - hype or hope? Lessons from a decennium of mHealth studies.

Authors:  Anna L Beukenhorst; Katie L Druce; Diederik De Cock
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Beshara; David B Anderson; Matthew Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Using Smartphone Sensor Paradata and Personalized Machine Learning Models to Infer Participants' Well-being: Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Alexander Hart; Dorota Reis; Elisabeth Prestele; Nicholas C Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 7.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.