Microstructural analysis of subchondral bone in knee osteoarthritis.

The results of this study show increased formation of bone in the subchondral areas in advanced stages of osteoarthritis of the knee. These changes seem to be influenced by mechanical factors.
INTRODUCTION: Subchondral bone changes seem to contribute to the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to analyze subchondral bone microstructure in specimens of late-stage knee OA in respect to articular cartilage damage, meniscus integrity, and knee joint alignment.
METHODS: Thirty proximal tibiae of 30 patients (20 female and 10 male) with late-stage OA retrieved during total knee arthroplasty were scanned using a high-resolution micro-computed tomography. The scans were semi-automatically segmented into five volumes of interest. The volumes of interest were then further analyzed using commercially available software. The degree of articular cartilage damage was assessed semi-quantitatively by magnetic resonance imaging before surgery.
RESULTS: The mean bone fraction volume (bone volume/total volume (BV/TV)) in all weight-bearing locations was significantly higher compared to the non-weight-bearing reference point below the anterior cruciate ligament (p = 0.000). The mean BV/TV in the medial compartment was significantly higher compared to the lateral compartment (p = 0.007). As for the BV/TV in intact menisci, there was a significantly lower subchondral bone fraction volume compared to subluxated or luxated menisci in the medial (p = 0.020) and lateral compartment (p = 0.005). Varus alignment had a significantly higher subchondral BV/TV in the medial compartment, whereas valgus alignment had a significantly higher subchondral BV/TV in the lateral compartment (p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: The results show significant differences of subchondral bone microstructural parameters in respect to cartilage damage, meniscus' structural integrity, and knee joint alignment. Therefore, subchondral bone changes seem to be a secondary process in the late-stage OA of the knee caused by mechanical changes.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease characterized by the deterioration of joint cartilage causing pain, stiffness, and impaired range of motion (ROM) [1].

Subchondral bone is important for physiological joint function. The close relationship between subchondral bone and joint cartilage make both a functional unit. Both tissues are mechanically and biologically connected. Mechanical or biological changes of subchondral bone will affect cartilage and vice versa [2]. The tissue of origin, however, has been discussed controversially.

The roles of subchondral bone in the articular joint are to distribute forces, prevent stress concentrations, and adapt to maintain conformation of the joint [3]. Articular cartilage is designed for loadbearing. Its high water content allows deformation under compressive loads without failure. Its capacity to withstand tension or shear stresses that occur at the edges of joint contact regions is lower. This could be exacerbated in homogeneously dense and stiff areas where the cartilage would deform more in regions overlying less dense parts of the subchondral bone than in denser regions. The regions between these stiff and less stiff regions are sites of stress concentration at which the cartilage is more likely to fail under tension conditions [3].

In preclinical experimental studies, it was shown that mechanical loading contributes to OA progression by affecting the subchondral bone [4]. It is believed that due to chronic impacts associated with microtraumas (microfractures) in the subchondral bone, increased remodeling is initiated.

In late-stage OA, the chronic (microfracture-) healing process results in an imbalance of remodeling in favor of bone formation leading to sclerosis and thickening of the subchondral bone. Subchondral sclerosis is a classic sign of the progression of OA which can be seen in X-rays [5]. Its role in the progression of OA has been discussed controversially, whether it initiates OA progression or can be seen as a consequence of the catabolism of the articular cartilage [3, 5, 6].

Data is accumulating that subchondral bone changes may be involved in the progression of OA [2, 3, 6]. Experimental as well as clinical studies showed a correlation of cartilage damage and subchondral bone density [3, 6–8]. Microstructural analyses have been performed in human specimens of OA of the hip as well as OA of the knee. In both anatomic regions, increased subchondral bone density beneath areas of cartilage damage has been found [8].

In an experimental biomechanical study, it was demonstrated that cartilage in OA has less potential of shock absorption compared to normal physiological knee cartilage [9]. Furthermore, the loss of a meniscus’ integrity by either “meniscus injury” or “total meniscectomy” resulted in an increased impact force of 113% up to 121% in “total meniscectomy.” Therefore, the resulting increased impact in the subchondral bone will result in sclerotic bone after microfracture healing [9].

Knee alignments as well as meniscus’ integrity are structural and geometric parameters that influence mechanical loading in the knee joint. Varus alignment for example leads to higher loading conditions of the medial compartment. An intact meniscal structure prevents the cartilage to degenerate [10, 11]. This is of major interest in clinical practice where resection of meniscus in case of tears and the effect in patients with OA is discussed controversially [12, 13].

We aimed to analyze subchondral bone microarchitecture in respect to cartilage damage, meniscus’ integrity and knee joint alignment in proximal tibia specimens of patients with late-stage OA. We hypothesized that (1) subchondral bone beneath areas with a high degree of cartilage damage may have increased bone density compared to areas with lower degrees of cartilage damage and (2) intact meniscal structures may have reduced subchondral bone density compared to luxated or subluxated ones and that knee joint malalignment may cause higher density in the subchondral bone of the affected compartment. To our knowledge, this is the first study on subchondral bone changes conducted in patients with advanced stage of OA of the knee that uses a combination of approach and methods to compare subchondral bone microarchitecture with cartilage damage, meniscus’ integrity, and knee joint alignment.

Methods

Patients

Thirty consecutive patients (20 female and 10 male, mean age 70.4 ± 9.9 years) who were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were prospectively chronologically (sequentially) included in this study. Inclusion criteria were age between 50 and 90 years, either female or male sex, and the presence of primary late-stage OA of the knee (Kellgren and Lawrence classification grade 3 or 4). Exclusion criteria were the presence of benign or malignant tumor in the affected joint, local or systemic metabolic bone disorders (except osteoporosis), rheumatoid arthritis, prior trauma, or surgery of the joint (except arthroscopy).

Clinical assessment

Patients were recruited and evaluated at our department’s outpatient clinic and subsequently scheduled for TKA. One day prior to surgery, the patients were examined physically and assessed using a standardized questionnaire, the Knee Society Score (KSS) at the ward [14].

The KSS was developed by consensus of the Knee Society [14]. The KSS is a widely used functional outcome score for knee arthroplasty. The KSS consists of two parts, the Knee Score and the Function Score. A maximum of 100 points can be obtained in both scores each.

Demographic data and laboratory blood analyses

Demographic and medical data was retrieved from our records. Patients had routine laboratory blood analyses 1 day prior surgery.

X-rays

Preoperatively, all patients had X-rays of the knee joint in anterior/posterior and lateral view, axial patella “skyline view” (Merchant’s view), and a full-leg X-ray to analyze the degree of malalignment.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Preoperatively, within 6 weeks before TKA, patients had a MRI scan of the affected knee joint. MR images were obtained using a 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner with a maximum gradient amplitude of 40 mT/m (Siemens Magnetom Trio ®, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). The following protocols were used: a transversal T2-weighted 3D CISS (Constructive Interference in Steady State), a sagittal 3D GRE (Gradient recalled Echo), and a sagittal 3D DESS (Dual Echo Steady State).

The severity of OA was estimated by using MRI scans by two board-certified radiologists (E.T., H.S.) using a semi-quantitative scoring system published by Yuslih et al. [15]. The scores are between 1 and 4, with 4 indicating an advanced stage of OA. Moreover, the integrity of both the medial and the lateral menisci was also assessed by MRI scanning. Menisci were defined either as “intact meniscus” (degenerative, but normal structure) or “non-intact meniscus” (luxated or subluxated).

Specimens

Proximal tibial specimens were retrieved during TKA. In TKA, the tibial plateau is resected by a maximum of 10 mm below the joint line in one piece with the help of a standardized cutting guide in order to preserve as much bone stock as possible. The specimens were fixed in ethanol 70% (Pharmacy Landeskrankenhaus – Universitätsklinikum Graz, Graz, Austria) and stored at − 20°C until analysis. Before μCT analysis, specimens were thawed for 24 h.

Micro-computed tomography (μCT) imaging and image processing

μCT imaging

The specimens were scanned using a preclinical MicroCT system (Inveon MicroCT ®, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). A scan of 360° was made at a voltage of 80 kVp and a current of 500 μA and an exposure time of 1300 ms. The effective pixel size was 43.96 μm. In addition, the specimens were consistently oriented in the scanner and aligned with the horizontal axis of the scanner. The specimens were positioned on a soft cotton tissue to reduce movement during the scan.

Image segmentation and trabecular bone processing

The segmentation of the three-dimensional (3D) cubic VOIs was performed using an in-house imaging software developed in MATLAB Version 8.2 R2013b (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). In each tibial bone sample, five different cubic volumes with an isotropic dimension of 4 mm3 were defined on the median coronal axis: lateral (submeniscal) (1), lateral compartment—center (2), center of the tibia as a reference (in between the tibial footprint of the ACL and PCL) (3), medial compartment—center (4), and medial (submeniscal) (5) VOI [see Fig. 1a]. These compartments were segmented according to the following processing steps.

Fig. 1

a Axial plane of a representative bone sample. A white rectangle was marked (white box) in the coronal plane wherein the locations of the five VOIs were automatically derived. b Coronal plane of a representative bone sample. As a second step, the first coronal slice of each predefined VOI was manually adjusted in the sagittal plane and automatically extended over the range of 4 mm

At first, a preliminary threshold was used to extract the mineralized bone phase. Each coronal and sagittal slice of the resulting binary data was superimposed onto a single coronal and sagittal plane depicting the outermost contour of the sample. Within the resulting coronal plane, a rectangular region was selected covering the majority of the cancellous bone starting with the positioning of the VOIs within the coronal plane [Fig. 1a]. The sides of the oblong were aligned parallel to the image margins. The width of the rectangle in medial-lateral direction was defined at the level of the median. At this level, a gap of 4 mm between the two sides and the outermost medial and lateral bone contour was applied. Subsequently, the centroids of the resulting oblong and of the superimposed bone were matched and the five VOIs were automatically placed along the medial-lateral axis intersecting the two centroids. The VOI 3, the center-reference, was placed on top of the centroid. The distance between the sides of the quadratic VOIs 1 and 5 and the corresponding edges of the rectangle were kept in the order of 1.2 mm. VOIs 2 and 4 were placed at half the distance between VOI 1 and 5 and VOI 3, respectively. After positioning in the coronal plane, the extent along the coronal direction of these VOIs was defined. Using the previously derived sagittal plane, the VOIs were manually placed adjacent to the joint surface [see Fig. 1b]. Subsequently, the resulting coordinates were translated to the originally tomographic data and automatically extended over the successive coronal slices. However, in case the VOI jutted out over the bone sample, the proximal end of the corresponding VOI was placed two slices above the margin of that sample. Finally, these semi-automatically derived volumes of each sample were transferred to commercially available software for microstructural analysis (see below).

Analysis of bone microstructural parameters

Siemens Inveon Research Workplace 3.0 (Siemens Medical Solutions Inc., Malvern, PA, USA) was used to analyze the following bone micro-structural parameters: Bone fraction volume (bone volume/total volume (BV/TV)), bone surface area/bone volume (BSA/BV), trabecular thickness (Tr.Th.), trabecular number (Tr.N.), trabecular spacing (Tr.Sp.), and trabecular pattern factor (Tb. Pf.).

Statistics

Data are presented as means and standard deviation (SD). Differences between locations (MM, medial meniscus; MT, medial tibia plateau; LM, lateral meniscus; LT lateral tibia plateau; ACL anterior cruciate ligament) were analyzed using ANOVA for repeated measurements. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Due to the exploratory character of the study, no p value adjustment for multiple testing was applied. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM-SPSS Statistics 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois; 2013).

Ethics

The conduction of the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical University of Graz (EK-Nr.: 25-203 ex 12/13). The representative material and patient demographic data were collected after obtaining written informed consent. In all cases, acquisition of samples complied with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Thirty proximal tibial specimens of 30 patients (20 women and 10 men) with late-stage knee OA were included in this study. The mean age of all patients in years was 70.4 ± 9.9. Women were older (74.3 ± 6.9 years) than men (62.5 ± 10.6 years) (p = 0.003). BMI in all patients was 29.5 ± 3.7 (women 30.1 ± 3.7, men 28.3 ± 3.7; p = 0.32). There were 5 patients with osteoporosis (16.6%, women n = 5) and 8 patients with osteopenia (26.7%, women n = 6, men n = 2). But both osteoporosis and osteopenia did not have any effect on the results, especially on BV/TV. For more patients’ demographic data see Table 1.

Table 1

Patients’ demographic data

	All patients (n = 30) (mean and SD)	Female patients (n = 20) (mean and SD)	Male patients (n = 10) (mean and SD)
Age (in years)	70.4 ± 9.9	74.3 ± 6.9	62.5 ± 10.6
Height (in cm)	166.7 ± 7.7	162. 8 ± 4.9	174.6 ± 6.3
Weight (in Kg)	82.0 ± 11.3	79.8 ± 10.4	86.4 ± 12.4
BMI	29.5 ± 3.7	30.1 ± 3.7	28.3 ± 3.7
Knee Society Score
Knee Score	52.4 ± 11.6	51.7 ± 12.8	53.7 ± 9.0
Knee Society Function Score	44.0 ± 12.2	43.8 ± 14.3	44.5 ± 6.9
Degree of cartilage damage
CD med.	3.5 ± 0.7	3.4 ± 0.7	3.7 ± 0.6
CD sm med.	3.3 ± 0.7	3.3 ± 0.8	3.3 ± 0.6
CD lat.	2.3 ± 0.8	2.3 ± 0.9	2.3 ± 0.8
CD sm lat.	1.8 ± 0.6	1.7 ± 0.8	2.0 ± 0.5

Legend: CD cartilage damage according to Yulish et al., sm submeniscal, med medial, lat lateral

Knee Society Score

The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) for all patients was 52.4 ± 11.6 (similar in women 51.7 ± 12.8 compared to men 53.7 ± 9.0, p = 0.39) and the mean Knee Society Function Score was 44.0 ± 12.2 (also similar in women 43.8 ± 14.3 compared to men 44.5 ± 6.9, p = 0.17), see Table 1.

Cartilage damage assessed by MRI

The mean grade of cartilage damage in the medial compartment was 3.5 ± 0.7 (women 3.4 ± 0.7, men 3.7 ± 0.6; p = 0.195) compared to the mean grade of cartilage damage of 2.28 ± 0.8 in the lateral compartment (women 2.3 ± 0.9, men 2.3 ± 0.8; p = 0.358). The degree of cartilage damage analyzed in various locations can be seen in Table 1.

μCT imaging

The results of the μCT analysis can be seen in Table 2. The mean BV/TV in the medial compartment was significantly higher compared to the mean BV/TV in the lateral compartment (62.07 ± 12.53 vs. 52.57 ± 13.33; p = 0.007). The submeniscal mean BV/TV in the medial compartment was significantly higher compared to submeniscal mean BV/TV in the lateral compartment (56.76 ± 12.8 vs. 47.36 ± 14.97; p = 0.015). There was a significantly lower BV/TV in the medial submeniscal subchondral bone compared to the subchondral BV/TV from the medial tibial plateau compartment (p = 0.041). There was a significant difference in the lateral submeniscal subchondral BV/TV compared to the subchondral BV/TV from the lateral tibial plateau compartment (p = 0.024). The BV/TV in all weight-bearing locations (medial meniscus, medial tibial plateau, lateral meniscus, lateral tibial plateau) was significantly higher compared to the non-weight-bearing reference point below the ACL (p < 0.001) [Table 2].

Table 2

Bone parameters for the five locations assessed by μCT

	MM (mean and SD)	MT (mean and SD)	ACL (mean and SD)	LT (mean and SD)	LM (mean and SD)	p value ACL:MM	p value ACL:MT	p value ACL:LT	p value ACL:LM
BV/TV (%)	56.76 ± 12.80	62.07 ± 12.53	34.40 ± 07.87	52.57 ± 13.33	47.36 ± 14.97	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001
BSA/BV (1/mm)	6.04 ± 1.96	5.41 ± 1.9	9.01 ± 2.29	6.29 ± 2.53	7.27 ± 2.15	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001
Tr.Th. (μm)	401.42 ± 215.72	429.27 ± 199.29	222.13 ± 41.83	374.90 ± 231.95	315.58 ± 168.64	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p = 0,001	p = 0,006
Tr.N. (μm)	1.58 ± 0.28	1.58 ± 0.39	1.55 ± 0.23	1.58 ± 0.35	1.59 ± 0.31	p = 0.613	p = 0.703	p = 0,665	p = 0,498
Tr. Sp. (1/mm)	272.98 ± 67.05	245.59 ± 77.88	435.27 ± 99.30	304.83 ± 101.46	340.83 ± 129.45	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001	p < 0.0001

MM medial meniscus, MT medial tibial plateau, LM lateral meniscus, LT lateral tibia plateau, ACL anterior cruciate ligament

Among the microarchitectural parameters, there were some statistically significant differences (p = 0.05) between men and women: In MT trabecular thickness (men 0.41 vs. women 0.44; p = 0.024) and trabecular number (men 1.55 vs. women 1.60; p = 0.026) were higher in women compared to men, whereas the trabecular pattern factor (men 5.82 vs. women 5.16; p = 0.01) was higher in men than in women. In LT BV/TV (men 0.45 vs. women 0.55; p = 0.044) was higher in women, but trabecular pattern factor (men − 2.76 vs. women − 4.84; 0.006) was higher in men. Trabecular number in the medial (men 1.55 vs. women 1.60; p = 0.038) was higher in men than in women, and trabecular pattern factor in the lateral compartment (men − 2.30 vs. women − 4.37; p = 0.035) was higher in men.

Meniscus integrity

Thirteen of the medial menisci were intact, whereas 17 were either sub-luxated or luxated. On the other hand, 24 of the lateral menisci were intact, whereas six were either sub-luxated or luxated. In intact menisci, there was a significantly lower subchondral BV/TV compared to subluxated or luxated menisci in the medial (p = 0.020) and lateral compartment (p = 0.005) [Figs. 2 and 3].

Fig. 2

Boxplots of subchondral BV/TV in the 5 analyzed locations (MM, medial meniscus; MT, medial tibial compartment; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; LT, lateral tibial compartment; LM, lateral meniscus) in respect to intact (white boxes) and subluxated or luxated (black boxes) medial menisci.. Circles are outliners

Fig. 3

Boxplots of subchondral BV/TV in the 5 analyzed locations (MM, medial meniscus; MT, medial tibial compartment; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; LT, lateral tibial compartment; LM, lateral meniscus) in respect to intact (white boxes) and subluxated or luxated (black boxes ) lateral menisci

Knee joint alignment

There was a varus alignment in 22 patients with a mean of 6.3° ± 4.5° deviation. Six patients had a valgus alignment with a mean of 7.0° ± 4.4° deviation. Two patients had an orthograde axis. Varus alignment resulted in a significantly higher subchondral BV/TV in the medial compartment than valgus, whereas valgus alignment had a significantly higher subchondral BV/TV in the lateral compartment (p = 0.011) [Fig. 4].

Fig. 4

Boxplots of subchondral BV/TV in 5 analyzed locations (MM, medial meniscus; MT, medial tibial compartment; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; LT, lateral tibial compartment; LM, lateral meniscus) in respect to knee joint alignment. Varus (black boxes) and valgus alignment (white boxes).

Cartilage damage

There was a significant correlation between the degree of cartilage damage and BV/TV (p < 0.001), BSA/BV (p = 0.008), trabecular thickness (p = 0.008), trabecular separation (p = 0.001), and trabecular pattern factor (p = 0.005) in MT. The distribution of BV/TV of all measured locations in respect to cartilage damage in male and female patients is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Distribution of BV/TV in respect to cartilage damage in male and female patients

Discussion

Recently, subchondral bone shifted into the focus as a possible cause of OA initiation and progression [3, 7] and subsequently as a potential treatment target [3]. Increased bone remodelling in the subchondral bone can be found in early-stage disease [16-19], leading to bone thickening as OA progresses, whereas in late-stage disease, the rate of remodelling decreases. In tissue specimens of late-stage hip OA with focal cartilage damage, increased subchondral bone density was seen in histomorphometry as well as in microstructural analyses by μCT [20].

To our knowledge, this is the first study on subchondral bone changes conducted in patients with advanced stage of osteoarthritis of the knee. New is also the combination of the approach and the methods used: (1) Before the total knee arthroplasty, we had x-rays and MRI done to investigate malalignment, cartilage damage, and meniscus integrity. (2) Due to the resection technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) where the tibial plateau is resected in one piece, we were able to examine different subchondral bone areas within the tibial plateau. (3) We analyzed the subchondral bone in total tibial plateaus by using microCT. Segmentation of the initial scan was done using semi-automatic segmentation software. (4) The use of the above mentioned approach and methods made possible a comparison of subchondral bone changes and articular cartilage damage, meniscus integrity, and knee joint alignment.

In a biomechanical setting, results showed that cartilage of OA knees had a lower force attenuation compared to physiological cartilage [9]. We can expect that with severe cartilage damage subchondral BV/TV will be increased. The results of this study showed that the degree of cartilage damage varies within the knee compartments and that these changes are associated with subchondral bone changes. In areas of higher cartilage damage, a significantly increased subchondral BV/TV could be identified. The highest BV/TV was seen in the medial subchondral tibial compartment, where also the highest degree of cartilage damage could be assessed. These results provide evidence that subchondral bone changes in OA are secondary processes. These findings are supported by the results of a study on femoral heads in patients with hip OA [8].

Subchondral bone changes were more pronounced in patients’ knees that showed structural changes of the menisci or malalignment than in knees of patients who did not have any structural or mechanical alterations. We therefore conclude that the cartilage damages are due to the loss of the meniscus’ integrity or malalignment and therefore can be considered as “secondary.”

We also looked at meniscal integrity by using MRI. Intact meniscal structures reduce the mechanical impacts at the proximal tibia and have therefore been considered to be beneficial for cartilage integrity and to prevent OA progression. In this study, the sub-meniscal subchondral bone had significantly lower BV/TV compared to weight-bearing locations centrally at the medial and lateral tibial compartment. This supports the non-surgical management of degenerative, but structurally intact, menisci. On the other hand, the results also support the indication of surgical intervention in case of luxation or subluxation of menisci [12, 13].

Another risk factor for the initiation and progression of OA is knee joint malalignment [21]. The majority of patients studied had a varus alignment and a higher subchondral BV/TV in the medial compartment compared to the lateral one. This might support the role of corrective osteotomy to prevent OA progression in both cartilage and subchondral bone.

Due to the study design, as patients scheduled for surgery were recruited chronologically, more women than men were included in this study, and women were also older (mean age 74.3 + − 6.9 versus 62.5 + − 10.6). Concerning differences between men and women, microarchitectural parameters proved statistically significantly different (p < 0.05) in MT and LT, the medial and lateral compartment. BV/TV in LT, trabecular thickness in MT, and trabecular number in both MT and in the medial compartment was higher in women compared to men, whereas the trabecular pattern factor in MT, LT, and the lateral compartment was higher in men compared to women.

Microstructural parameters, especially BV/TV, were not affected by osteoporosis or osteopenia. Although there were five patients with osteoporosis and seven with osteopenia, it seems that mechanical factors like cartilage damage, meniscus’ structural integrity, and knee joint alignment in local areas plays a more important role than a systemic disease.

The strength of this study is that human ex vivo knee OA specimens were studied. The majority of previous studies investigating the role of subchondral bone in OA were conducted in an experimental setting using animals [3, 19]. In humans, studies were performed mainly at the hip. In most experimental studies published previously, knee OA initiation and progression were induced by either sectioning the ACL or PCL or collateral ligaments or complete meniscectomy to produce OA [3, 19]. So, these studies induced a secondary OA of the knee. In this study, patients had a continuous natural progression of disease resulting in a primary OA of the knee.

Another strength of this study is the use of a semi-automatic segmentation software for identifying the VOI in the proximal tibial scans. This avoids subjective influence on selection of the studied region. Therefore, results are comparable on a more objective level. An auto-segmented VOI size of 4 mm3 was chosen, compared to manually extracted core cylinders that analyzed specimens of up to 10 mm longitudinal size. The most dramatic and homogeneous changes of subchondral bone density in OA are described within the first 6 mm below the cartilage [22]. So, more realistic values could be reached compared to other studies that used cores to extract cylinders of 10 mm length manually. Furthermore, by using auto-segmentation in a whole scan of a specimen, the risk of artifacts is also reduced as parts close to the cutting edge are not being destroyed compared to manual extraction [23]. The same segmentation process to identify the various VOIs in each tibial plateau was applied in all specimens. Due to the anatomical differences such as malalignment, the resection level is close to the joint line. In such cases, the volume of a VOI was lower compared to a resection that was 10 mm below the joint line.

A weakness of the study might be the sample size of 30 specimens. However, this sample number is comparable or even higher than other studies using μCT [3, 8]. Another limiting factor might be the evaluation of cartilage degeneration by MRI using a semi-quantitative method as described by Yulish et al. [8]. On the other hand, it has been shown that evaluation of cartilage damage by MRI correlates well with histopathologic analyses [24].

Conclusions

Concluding, we could show significant differences of subchondral bone microstructural parameters in respect to cartilage damage, meniscus’ structural integrity, and knee joint alignment. Therefore, subchondral microstructural bone changes seem to be a secondary process in late-stage OA of the knee caused by mechanical changes, and the proper management of these changes might prevent subchondral bone changes and therefore prevent or slow the progression of OA.