| Literature DB >> 32471756 |
Tatiana Cristina Figueira Polo1, José Eduardo Corrente2, Luciane Donida Bartoli Miot3, Silvia Justina Papini4, Hélio Amante Miot5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease with systemic repercussions and an association with comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity. Psoriasis patients have a higher prevalence of obesity compared to the general population. Diet is a relevant environmental factor, since malnutrition, inadequate body weight, and metabolic diseases, in addition to the direct health risk, impair the treatment of psoriasis.Entities:
Keywords: Feeding behavior; Food consumption; Psoriasis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32471756 PMCID: PMC7335888 DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: An Bras Dermatol ISSN: 0365-0596 Impact factor: 1.896
Demographic, socioeconomic, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics of patients with psoriasis interviewed at the dermatology clinic (n = 94).
| Variables | Results |
|---|---|
| Female | 54 (57) |
| Male | 40 (43) |
| 54.9 (12.8) | |
| Illiterate | 3 (3) |
| Elementary school | 51 (54) |
| High school | 31 (33) |
| University education | 9 (10) |
| 1 | 17 (18) |
| 2 | 44 (47) |
| ≥3 | 33 (35) |
| Weight (kg) | 84.8 (17.1) |
| Height (cm) | 1.7 (0.1) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.1 (6.2) |
| Eutrophic (18.5–24.9) | 11 (12) |
| Overweight (25–29.9) | 38 (40) |
| Obesity (>30) | 45 (48) |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 109.0 (13.7) |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 104.2 (14.7) |
| WHR (cm) | 1.06 (0.15) |
| Disease duration (years) | 15.7 (12.1) |
| Skin disease activity (plaques) | 75 (84) |
| Joint disease | 11 (12) |
| PASI | 5.3 (4.8) |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 43 (49) |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 39 (43) |
| Hypertension (mmHg) | 42 (47) |
| Altered blood glucose or DM (mg/dL) | 34 (38) |
| Metabolic syndrome | 47 (50) |
DM, diabetes mellitus; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; BMI, body mass index.
n (%).
Mean (SD).
Food patterns and factorial loads of the foods that make up each pattern, identified by analyzing the sample food frequency questionnaire.
| Pattern 1 (processed diet) | FL | Pattern 2 (fresh diet) | FL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pizza | 0.79 | Raw vegetables | 0.73 |
| Deep fried savory snack | 0.74 | Cooked vegetables | 0.73 |
| Filled cookie | 0.69 | Tomato | 0.70 |
| Charcuterie | 0.69 | Cooked greens | 0.68 |
| Cheese | 0.67 | Broccoli | 0.62 |
| Sandwiches | 0.66 | Carrot | 0.59 |
| Soda | 0.64 | Lettuce | 0.57 |
| Flour | 0.53 | Orange | 0.50 |
| Burger | 0.52 | Salt | 0.42 |
| Mayonnaise | 0.45 | Apple | 0.42 |
| Baked savory snack | 0.38 | Olive oil/cooking oil | 0.39 |
| Breads | 0.38 | Banana | 0.38 |
| Desserts | 0.37 | Melon | 0.38 |
| Sausage | 0.35 | Papaya | 0.38 |
| Industrialized juice | 0.32 | Potato | 0.31 |
| Butter | 0.32 |
FL, factorial load; KMO = 0.65.
Multivariate comparison of the scores of dietary patterns with anthropometric, demographic, and psoriasis-related variables (n = 94).
| Variable | Pattern 1 (processed) | Pattern 2 (fresh) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.027 | 0.748 | 0.268 | 0.006 | |
| −0.01 | 0.123 | 0.05 | 0.045 | |
| College or university degree | 0.042 | 0.760 | −0.183 | 0.329 |
| High school | −0.090 | 0.278 | −0.069 | 0.547 |
| Illiterate + elementary school | (−) | |||
| 0.020 | 0.327 | 0.099 | 0.003 | |
| −0.009 | 0.076 | −0.009 | 0.492 | |
| 0.230 | 0.362 | −0.340 | 0.054 | |
| −0.005 | 0.034 | −0.005 | 0.154 | |
| −0.110 | 0.233 | −0.353 | 0.001 | |
| −0.145 | 0.096 | −0.014 | 0.427 | |
| −0.074 | 0.256 | −0.037 | 0.852 | |
| 0.092 | 0.208 | 0.176 | 0.142 | |
| −0.084 | 0.333 | 0.117 | 0.938 | |
| 0.187 | 0.057 | −0.063 | 0.526 | |
BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.
Adjusted p-value.
Figure 1Perceptual map of the main demographic, clinical, and anthropometric variables and adherence to dietary patterns in 94 patients with psoriasis. Quantitative variables were categorized according to the tertile of the distributions. DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; WTH, waist-to-hip ratio; AH, arterial hypertension. Standardized scores for P1 and P2 ranged from −3 to +3 according to adherence to each dietary pattern.