Yasuyuki Ueda1, Hiroshi Tanaka2, Koji Tomita3, Takashi Tachibana4, Hiroaki Inui2, Katsuya Nobuhara2, Jun Umehara5, Noriaki Ichihashi6. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Nobuhara Hospital, Hyogo, Japan; Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: yasuyuki-ueda@hotmail.co.jp. 2. Institute of Biomechanics, Nobuhara Hospital, Hyogo, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, Nobuhara Hospital, Hyogo, Japan. 4. Department of Rehabilitation, Nobuhara Hospital, Hyogo, Japan. 5. Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Research Fellow of Japan Society for Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the differences in shoulder muscle strength, cross-sectional area of the rotator cuff muscles, acromiohumeral distance, and supraspinatus tendon thickness between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Thirty-two symptomatic patients and 23 asymptomatic patients with rotator cuff tears participated in this study. Data of the patients with any type of tear and supraspinatus tear were analyzed. We evaluated the isometric torque, cross-sectional area of the rotator cuff muscles, supraspinatus tendon thickness, acromiohumeral distance, range of motion, and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. RESULTS: Asymptomatic patients showed greater isometric torque of shoulder abduction and internal rotation than symptomatic patients with any type of tear (P ≤ .01). Asymptomatic patients also demonstrated greater cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus (P < .01); however, there was no significant difference in the cross-sectional area of the other cuff muscles. There was also no significant difference in the supraspinatus tendon thickness (P = .10). The acromiohumeral distance at 90° of shoulder abduction was larger (P = .04) in asymptomatic patients. Additionally, similar tendencies were observed in the results of patients with supraspinatus tears, except for the isometric torque of shoulder external rotation. This torque was greater (P < .01) in asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients showed greater shoulder range of motion, muscle strength of shoulder abduction and internal rotation, small occupation ratio of supraspinatus tendon thickness as a percentage of acromiohumeral distance, and large cross-sectional area of supraspinatus.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the differences in shoulder muscle strength, cross-sectional area of the rotator cuff muscles, acromiohumeral distance, and supraspinatus tendon thickness between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Thirty-two symptomatic patients and 23 asymptomatic patients with rotator cuff tears participated in this study. Data of the patients with any type of tear and supraspinatus tear were analyzed. We evaluated the isometric torque, cross-sectional area of the rotator cuff muscles, supraspinatus tendon thickness, acromiohumeral distance, range of motion, and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. RESULTS: Asymptomatic patients showed greater isometric torque of shoulder abduction and internal rotation than symptomatic patients with any type of tear (P ≤ .01). Asymptomatic patients also demonstrated greater cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus (P < .01); however, there was no significant difference in the cross-sectional area of the other cuff muscles. There was also no significant difference in the supraspinatus tendon thickness (P = .10). The acromiohumeral distance at 90° of shoulder abduction was larger (P = .04) in asymptomatic patients. Additionally, similar tendencies were observed in the results of patients with supraspinatus tears, except for the isometric torque of shoulder external rotation. This torque was greater (P < .01) in asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients showed greater shoulder range of motion, muscle strength of shoulder abduction and internal rotation, small occupation ratio of supraspinatus tendon thickness as a percentage of acromiohumeral distance, and large cross-sectional area of supraspinatus.
Authors: Ju Hyun Son; Zee Won Seo; Woosik Choi; Youn-Young Lee; Suk-Woong Kang; Chang-Hyung Lee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 3.390