| Literature DB >> 32471456 |
Caroline Katharina Stiller1,2, Silvia Konstanze Ellen Golembiewski3,4, Monika Golembiewski5, Srikanta Mondal6, Hans Konrad Biesalski7, Veronika Scherbaum7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In West Bengal, according to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16, undernutrition and anemia are particularly common among scheduled tribe women and children. The purpose of this research is to assess the nutritional status of Adivasi mothers and child feeding patterns, relevant for clinical practice and the design of future preventive actions. These baseline characteristics were obtained in the scope of a feeding trial aimed at improving the hemoglobin concentration of the index child (6-39 months).Entities:
Keywords: Adivasi; Breastfeeding; Child care; Complementary foods; India; Infant/child feeding; Maternal anemia; Santals; Undernutrition; West Bengal
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32471456 PMCID: PMC7257594 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-020-00262-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Breastfeed J ISSN: 1746-4358 Impact factor: 3.461
Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers
| n (%) or Mean ± SD/Median, Min/Max | |
|---|---|
| 273 (93.8) | |
| 1 (0.3) | |
| 17 (5.8) | |
| 177 (65.1) | |
| 95 (34.9) | |
| 19.9 ± 2.5/19.0, 14/29 | |
| 29 (10.1) | |
| 194 (67.8) | |
| 57 (19.9) | |
| 6 (2.1) | |
| 1.8 ± 0.8/2, 1/5 | |
| 119 (41.8) | |
| 117 (41.1) | |
| 42 (14.7) | |
| 5 (1.8) | |
| 2 (0.7) | |
| 41.8 ± 24.6/36, 10/186 | |
| 41.8 ± 23.5/36, 12/99 | |
| 55.9 ± 35.5/45, 12/99 | |
| 68.5 ± 36.8/82.5, 24/99 | |
| 38 (13.3) | |
| 89 (31.2) | |
| 158 (55.4) | |
| 264 (94.3) | |
| 16 (5.7) | |
| 82 (29.1) | |
| 197 (69.9) | |
| 3 (1.1) | |
| 274 (97.5) | |
| 7 (2.6) | |
| 133 (46.2) | |
| 125 (43.3) | |
| 30 (10.4) | |
| 7.8 ± 2.5/7.8, 1/14 | |
| 3.4 ± 2.6/2.5, 0.5/8 | |
| 2.9 ± 2.0/2.5, 0.5/9.5 | |
| 1.3 ± 0.8/1.0, 0.2/4 | |
| 1.3 ± 0.6/1.0, 0.3/3 | |
| 1.5 ± 0.8/1.0, 0.5/5 | |
| all indicated activities during the day ( | 14.3 ± 2.2/15, 7/19 |
NN not normally distributed tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, the hypothesis regarding the distributional form is rejected with *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Selected anthropometric and hematological characteristics of children and mothers
| 0.872 (872 girls/ 1000 boys) | |
| 22.5 ± 9.5/23.0, 6/39 | |
| 54 (17.6) | |
| 109 (35.5) | |
| 124 (40.4) | |
| 20 (6.5) | |
| -1.19 ± 0.93, −3.84/2.51 | |
| -0.96 ± 0.96, −3.75/2.87 | |
| −2.03 ± 1.11, −5.75/2.00 | |
| −1.95 ± 0.98, −4.36/1.44 | |
| −1.09 ± 0.88/− 1.02, − 3.52/1.69 | |
| 13.8 ± 1.0/13.8, 11/16.8 | |
| 9.1 ± 1.3, 5.0/12.7 | |
| 24.5 ± 3.9/24.0, 18/40 | |
| 149.5 ± 5.5, 136.4/165.6 | |
| 41.5 ± 4.9/41.1, 31.5/60.0 | |
| 18.6 ± 1.8/18.5, 14.8/27.4 | |
| 2 (0.7) | |
| 141 (49.8) | |
| 96 (33.9) | |
| 30 (10.6) | |
| 14 (4.9) | |
| 22.5 ± 1.8, 18.0/29.6 | |
| 114 (40.3) | |
| 119 (42.0) | |
| 49 (17.3) | |
| 1 (0.4) | |
| 10.4 ± 1.4/10.5, 6.5/14.1 | |
| 39 (13.8) | |
| 74 (26.1) | |
| 153 (54.1) | |
| 17 (6.0) | |
NN not normally distributed tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, the hypothesis regarding the distributional form is rejected with *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Note: n = 5 pregnant (excluded for analysis of BMI, Hb, MUAC), n = 10 mothers have two children participating in the study
Correlation between selected study variables to investigate quantitative associations of hematological/anthropometric and nutritional indicators
| Spearman’s Linear Correlation (r) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.786** | <0.001*** | |
| 0.128* | 0.032* | |
| 0.242** | <0.001*** | |
| 0.332** | <0.001*** | |
| 0.125* | 0.033* | |
| 0.249** | <0.001*** | |
| 0.270** | <0.001*** | |
| 0.242** | <0.001*** | |
| 0.175** | 0.003** | |
| (0.062/0.012/0.129*) | (0.321/0.852/0.037*) | |
| (0.097/0.133*/0.069) | (0.124/0.034*/0.270) | |
| (0.072/0.092/0.055) | (0.253/0.144/0.387) | |
| (0.073/0.002**) | ||
| (0.358/0.001**) | ||
| (0.502/0.005**) | ||
| (0.624/0.034*) | ||
| 0.007** | ||
| 0.130 | ||
Note: child feeding practices investigated, were having squeezed out any breastmilk before breastfeeding (“no/yes” question), feeding of prelacteal foods (“no/yes” question), time of initiation of BF after delivery (categorial), duration of performed ExcBF (months), timely introduction of CF at 6 to 8 months of child’s life, fulfillment of minimum acceptable diet (“no/yes” question), count of food groups (FG) consumed, count of FG adjusted for age. If associations related to these variables are not presented in Table 3 the correlation was not found to be significant
Definition of food groups (FG): starchy foods (grains, roots, tubers), legumes and nuts, dairy products, flesh foods (meat, fish, poultry, organ meats), eggs, vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables, other fruits and vegetables
Asterisks indicate in case of p-values the level of significance p<0.05*, p<0.01**, p<0.001***. Similarly in case of the correlation coefficient r the asterisks indicate if the correlation is significant (p<0.05*) or very significant (p<0.01**) according to the output of SPSS. The strength of correlation is interpreted as follows: up to 0.2 (very weak), up to 0.5 (weak), up to 0.7 (moderate), up to 0.9 (high)
Fig. 1Anemia status of children (n = 293) in percent by mother’s anemia status (n = 283), with ten mothers having two children participating in the study
Fig. 2Anthropometric failure of children (n = 293) by maternal nutritional status (n = 283), with n = 10 mothers having two children participating in the study
Fig. 3Time of initiation of breastfeeding after delivery (n = 268). Note: n = 6 women were unclear about that question and their responses are not included in that figure
Fig. 4Duration of performed ExcBF (n = 231). Note: n = 32 women were unclear about that question, n = 12 women were still exclusively breastfeeding at the time of the interview, thus their responses are not included in the figure. The planned duration was on average 7.5 ± 3.0 months, ranging from 1 to 14 months. The rationale for the time frame of 4 up to 8 months, indicted as being still acceptable for practicing ExcBF or introduction of complementary foods in the Figs. 4 and 5, is based on the combined interpretation of the proposed feeding indicators by WHO/UNICEF [21], as these two indicators are intertwined for holistic interpretation
Fig. 5Age of having introduced regular complementary feedings (n = 252). Note: n = 11 women were unclear about that question, n = 17 women had not yet introduced CF, thus their responses are not included in the figure. The planned introduction of CFNN** was on average 7.8 ± 1.9 months (median: 7.0 months), ranging from 6 to 14 months
Fig. 6Duration of ExcBF and introduction of CF in percent by age (months). Note: CF (n = 252), ExcBF (n = 231). Timely introduction of CF is highlighted
Reason for introducing CF at the respective age
| Reason for having introduced CF at the indicated age | Time of introduction of CF | % of total reponses ( |
|---|---|---|
| 44.4 | ||
| 10.3 | ||
| 7.4 | ||
| 6.6 | ||
| 7.0 | ||
| 5.3 | ||
| 5.8 | ||
| 3.3 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 2.1 | ||
| 1.2 | ||
| 1.2 |
Minor responses (n = 1): child is able to digest other foods (at 7 m), to practice eating solid foods (at 6 m), father decided (at 7 m), health worker told (at 7 m), child needs blood at this age (at 6 m), child refused breastmilk at this age (6 m), mother moved away and married other man (at 6 m)
Age-related fulfillment of minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity and minimum acceptable diet by the study children (6 to 23 months)
| n (%) | N | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 to 8 months | 15 (53.6) | 28 |
| 9 to 11 months | 8 (40.0) | 20 |
| 12 to 23 months | 76 (75.2) | 101 |
| 6 to 8 months | 7 (25.0) | 28 |
| 9 to 11 months | 10 (50.0) | 20 |
| 12 to 23 months | 70 (75.3) | 93 |
| 6 to 8 months | 6 (21.4) | 28 |
| 9 to 11 months | 6 (30.0) | 20 |
| 12 to 23 months | 54 (58.1) | 93 |
Note: for meal frequency: breastfed children (n = 147), non-breastfed children (n = 2, serial No: 208, 354); for dietary diversity or acceptable diet: non-breastfed child (n = 1, serial No 208)
Recommendation for non-breastfed children: 4 cooked meals 6 to 23 months (minimum meal frequency), at least 2 milk feeds and ≥ 4 FG per day not counting milk feeds (minimum dietary diversity)
Fig. 7Fulfillment of WHO/UNICEF CF indicators by age for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Note: n = 2 women having a child aged 6-23 m at the time of the interview (presented in Fig. 7 and also in Table 5) did not breastfeed at the time of the interview. Herefore the criteria for non-breastfed children were applied [21]