| Literature DB >> 32471134 |
Areej A Eskandrani1, Shimaa M Ali1,2, Hiba M Al-Otaibi1.
Abstract
The catalytic activity of Sr2PdO3, prepared through the sol-gel citrate-combustion method for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in a 0.1 M HClO4 solution, was investigated. The electrocatalytic activity of Sr2PdO3 toward OER was assessed via the anodic potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The glassy carbon modified Sr2PdO3 (GC/Sr2PdO3) electrode exhibited a higher electrocatalytic activity, by about 50 times, in comparison to the unmodified electrode. The order of the reaction was close to unity, which indicates that the adsorption of the hydroxyl groups is a fast step. The calculated activation energy was 21.6 kJ.mol-1, which can be considered a low value in evaluation with those of the reported OER electrocatalysts. The Sr2PdO3 perovskite portrayed a high catalyst stability without any probability of catalyst poisoning. These results encourage the use of Sr2PdO3 as a candidate electrocatalyst for water splitting reactions.Entities:
Keywords: OER; Sr2PdO3; catalyst; electrochemical techniques; perovskite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32471134 PMCID: PMC7312865 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The (A) XRD pattern and (B) TEM image of Sr2PdO3 prepared by the citrate-method, miller indices (h, l, k) are showed.
Figure 2Potentiodynamic polarization of the unmodified and modified GC electrodes with Sr2PdO3 in a 0.1 M HClO4 solution.
Figure 3The (A) potentiodynamic polarization of GC/Sr2PdO3 in different concentrations of the HClO4 solutions and (B) the dependence of the logarithm of the current density at a definite potential on the pH of the solution.
Figure 4(A) The potentiodynamic polarization of GC/Sr2PdO3 at different temperatures in 0.1 M HClO4 solution, and (B) the corresponding Arrhenius plot.
Figure 5The current-time response of the potentiostatic experiment of GC/Sr2PdO3 in 0.1 M HClO4 subjected to a potential of 0.5 V for 150 min.
Figure 6The (A) Bode and (B) Nyquist plots GC/Sr2PdO3 in 0.1 M HClO4 at 0.50 V and various overpotentials, respectively. Symbols are experimental and solid lines are modeled data. (C) is the electrical equivalent circuit used for fitting.
Fitting parameters obtained by using the electrical equivalent circuit, shown in Figure 6C, for Nyquist plots of GC/Sr2PdO3 in 0.1 M HClO4 solution, at different applied overpotentials.
| Applied Overpotential (V) | CPE1 (µF cm−2) |
| CPE2 (µF cm−2) |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | 2.73 | 456.3 | 0.68 | 13.45 | 172.3 | 0.80 | 17.53 | 23.97 |
| 0.50 | 2.63 | 524.3 | 0.66 | 14.69 | 167.0 | 0.82 | 7.14 | 9.33 |
| 0.55 | 2.61 | 572.5 | 0.62 | 24.75 | 148.6 | 0.85 | 1.90 | - |