Literature DB >> 32470938

Normative data of a smartphone app-based 6-minute walking test, test-retest reliability, and content validity with patient-reported outcome measures.

Lazar Tosic1, Elior Goldberger1, Nicolai Maldaner2, Marketa Sosnova2, Anna M Zeitlberger2, Victor E Staartjes1, Pravesh S Gadjradj3, Hubert A J Eversdijk4, Ayesha Quddusi5, Maria L Gandía-González6, Jamasb Joshua Sayadi7, Atman Desai7, Luca Regli1, Oliver P Gautschi8, Martin N Stienen1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 6-minute walking test (6WT) is used to determine restrictions in a subject's 6-minute walking distance (6WD) due to lumbar degenerative disc disease. To facilitate simple and convenient patient self-measurement, a free and reliable smartphone app using Global Positioning System coordinates was previously designed. The authors aimed to determine normative values for app-based 6WD measurements.
METHODS: The maximum 6WD was determined three times using app-based measurement in a sample of 330 volunteers without previous spine surgery or current spine-related disability, recruited at 8 centers in 5 countries (mean subject age 44.2 years, range 16-91 years; 48.5% male; mean BMI 24.6 kg/m2, range 16.3-40.2 kg/m2; 67.9% working; 14.2% smokers). Subjects provided basic demographic information, including comorbidities and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): visual analog scale (VAS) for both low-back and lower-extremity pain, Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and subjective walking distance and duration. The authors determined the test-retest reliability across three measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], standard error of measurement [SEM], and mean 6WD [95% CI]) stratified for age and sex, and content validity (linear regression coefficients) between 6WD and PROMs.
RESULTS: The ICC for repeated app-based 6WD measurements was 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.91, p < 0.001) and the SEM was 34 meters. The overall mean 6WD was 585.9 meters (95% CI 574.7-597.0 meters), with significant differences across age categories (p < 0.001). The 6WD was on average about 32 meters less in females (570.5 vs 602.2 meters, p = 0.005). There were linear correlations between average 6WD and VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, COMI Back and COMI subscores of pain intensity and disability, ZCQ symptom severity, ZCQ physical function, and ZCQ pain and neuroischemic symptoms subscores, as well as with subjective walking distance and duration, indicating that subjects with higher pain, higher disability, and lower subjective walking capacity had significantly lower 6WD (all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative data for app-based 6WD measurements in a multicenter sample from 8 institutions and 5 countries. These values can now be used as reference to compare 6WT results and quantify objective functional impairment in patients with degenerative diseases of the spine using z-scores. The authors found a good to excellent test-retest reliability of the 6WT app, a low area of uncertainty, and high content validity of the average 6WD with commonly used PROMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  6-minute walking test; 6WD = 6-minute walking distance; 6WT = 6-minute walking test; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; COMI = Core Outcome Measures Index; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DDD = degenerative disc disease; GPS = Global Positioning System; HRQoL = health-related quality of life; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; LDH = lumbar disc herniation; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; MRC = Medical Research Council; OFI = objective functional impairment; PROM = patient-reported outcome measure; SEM = standard error of measurement; TUG = Timed Up and Go; VAS = visual analog scale; ZCQ = Zurich Claudication Questionnaire; degenerative disc disease; neurogenic claudication; normative data; objective functional impairment; reliability; spinal stenosis; spine surgery; test qualities; validity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32470938     DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE2084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

Review 1.  A vision for the future of wearable sensors in spine care and its challenges: narrative review.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; Wolbert van den Hoorn
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  Effects of self-quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A case-control study.

Authors:  Kazunori Hayashi; Toru Tanaka; Akira Sakawa; Tsuneyuki Ebara; Hidekazu Tanaka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Expanding the indications for measurement of objective functional impairment in spine surgery: A pilot study of four patients with diseases affecting the spinal cord.

Authors:  Gregor Fischer; Vincens Kälin; Oliver P Gautschi; Oliver Bozinov; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-07-20

4.  Smartphone-based real-life activity data for physical performance outcome in comparison to conventional subjective and objective outcome measures after degenerative lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Stefanos Voglis; Michal Ziga; Anna M Zeitlberger; Marketa Sosnova; Oliver Bozinov; Luca Regli; David Bellut; Astrid Weyerbrock; Martin N Stienen; Nicolai Maldaner
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-03-18

5.  SIZE study: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of an interarcuair decompression versus extended decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jamie Arjun Sharma; Pravesh S Gadjradj; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter A Moojen; Biswadjiet S Harhangi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.