Chuanyuan Kang1, Jun Tong2, Fu Meng1, Qiang Feng1, Hong Ma3, Chuan Shi4, Jing Yuan5, Shuran Yang6, Liang Liu7, Li Xu8, YingJun Xi9, Wentian Li10, Xudong Zhao1, Jianzhong Yang11. 1. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, China. 2. Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, 430012, China; City University of Macao, Macao, China. 3. Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, 100191, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China. 4. Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China. 5. Department of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650101, China. 6. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China. 7. Department of Clinical Psychology, Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 200124, China. 8. Department of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650101, China. 9. The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders & Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Beijing, China; Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 10. Clinical Psychology Department, Wuhan Mental Health Center, Gongnongbing Road 125, Wuhan, Hubei, 430012, China. 11. Department of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650101, China. Electronic address: jzhyang2004@163.com.
Letter to the EditorIt is well known that addressing psychological health issues in a social context is an effective strategy to help addressing healthcare problems (Kivimäki et al., 2020), Mental health services could therefore play a very important role, when a multidisciplinary medical force is facing a major or disastrous event involving a population.The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused the whole world to face major public health and safety issues, and the medical personnel have been fighting the pandemic at the frontline. Among them, many mental health professionals have been involved in the response from a very early stage.In China several major national professional organizations (the Chinese Association for Mental Health, the Chinese Psychological Society, the Chinese Psychiatrists Association and the Chinese Society of Psychiatry) organized intensive collaborative work among different mental health professionals, and issued several guidelines and protocols for effective psychological interventions for different populations (Ma, 2020; The Clinical and Counseling Psychology Registration System of Chinese Psychological Society, 2020).Psychiatrists and psychotherapists supported the whole health care system. By February 28th, 330 medical teams with more than 40,000 medical staff had been sent to Hubei Province to support the local health service, of whom 400∼500 are psychiatrists. In Wuhan, there were 5–10 psychiatrists working at the designated hospital for the treatment of the COVID-19. The cabin hospitals with a capacity of 600–1500 mild confirmed cases were equipped 5–15 psychiatrists according to the size of the hospital. These professionals were not only responsible for the mental healthcare of the patients, but also responsible for supporting the medical staff.Mental health staffs were involved in public health interventions based on psychoeducation on health-promoting behaviors as ways to reduce the overall stress caused by the epidemic. To contain the spread of the panic among the general public, as early as January 24th, just one day after the implementation of the strict quarantine in Wuhan, the Wuhan Mental Health Center launched the first free public crisis intervention hotline. Up to now there are 448 free psychological assistance hotlines across the country (National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, 2020).Self-help courses, online live broadcast and science lectures on psychological crisis were released or carried out live by experts, making psychological self-help interventions more easily available than ever before for the general public.Multiple mental health institutions efficiently published the psychological self-aid manual for the public after the outbreak of the disease. The team of the Psychosomatics Department of Shanghai East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University published a 60,000-word book entitled “Stay safe, stay strong: A guide for psychological self-adjustment in the pandemic period” on Feb 5th (online version) (Xudong and Zhongmin, 2020). So far, this book has been printed in 125,000 copies and 100,000 copies have been distributed to Hubei medical staff and patients, and Shanghai residents for free.Chinese mental health professionals have also provided the government with some specialist recommendations about policies, regulations, and measures from the perspective of individual, group and population mental health. Many suggestions have been gradually adopted, such as those addressing the issue of delivering humane, holistic care in the mobile cabin hospitals. Before the launch of this new type of hospital, based on these recommendations, psychosomatic medicine and holistic, humane care were integrated into one service in this kind of hospital. Consequently, despite initial concerns about the possibility of disorganization and confusion, the cabin hospitals were enabled to run in an overall smooth fashion.Finally, mental health staff was able to empower patients, families, and care providers in coping with the negative impact of traumatic events in recovery stage, such as post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In this global outbreak of the COVID-19, some families have lost all members, some people have lost both parents, and many others lost relatives and friends. Thus many families and individuals have been directly affected by death from the disease. Therefore, mental health professionals have been provided different types of psycho-social interventions to address a range of mental health problems.This epidemic highlighted these challenges that need to be resolved in order to be better prepared for similar scenarios in the future. Firstly the number of psychiatrists needs to be increased. In the last ten years the number of psychiatrists has increased from 24,000 to 40,000 (Chenhui et al., 2019), however, for a number of reasons patients suffering from mental disorders are generally more susceptible to infections (Hao et al., 2020a), so in this outbreak there were more psychiatric emergencies than psychiatrists and psychotherapists could handle. Secondly, even though there are lots of online psychological self-help services, many questions remain unanswered with regards to the availability and accessibility of online mental health services in low and middle-income countries (Hao et al., 2020b), especially for chronic psychiatricpatients (Chuanyuan et al., 2020). Finally, while playing a positive role in the control of the epidemic spread, the quarantine measure has also resulted in some negative outcomes, especially in the field of psychological health. So for the future there is a need to research a number of areas, such as the evaluation of the positive and negative effects of the quarantine on mental health and on the limitation of the epidemic spread, the efficacy of supporting interventions, as well as legal issues when facing severe public health crises.
Author Contributions
CYK, XDZ, JZY did data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and writing the manuscript. JT, FM, FQ, HM, CS, JY, SRY, LL, LX, YJX and WTL collected the data.