Literature DB >> 32470099

Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices.

Natalie England1, Julia Madill1, Amy Metcalfe1,2,3, Laura Magee4, Stephanie Cooper2, Charleen Salmon3,5, Kamala Adhikari3.   

Abstract

There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous surveillance systems exist but we lack a standardized approach. Given the current inconsistencies and the importance in monitoring these events, this study aimed to identify and compare commonly used surveillance methods. In June 2018, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using terms related to monitoring/surveillance and maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity. We included papers that used at least three indicators to monitor for these events and collected data on specific surveillance methods. We calculated the rate of maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity in hospitalization data obtained from the 2016 US National Inpatient Sample using five common surveillance methods. Of 18,832 abstracts, 178 papers were included in our review. 198 indicators were used in studies included in our review; 71.2% (n = 141) of these were used in <10% of included studies and only 6.1% (n = 12) were used in >50% of studies included in our review. Eclampsia was the only indicator that was assessed in >80% of included studies. The rate of these events in American hospitalization data varied depending on the criteria used, ranging from 5.07% (95% CI = 5.02, 5.11) with the Centers for Disease Control criteria and 7.85% (95% CI = 7.79, 7.91) using the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Our review highlights inconsistencies in monitoring practices within and between developed and developing countries. Given the wide variation in monitoring approaches observed and the likely contributing factors for these differences, it may be more feasible for clinical and academic efforts to focus on standardizing approaches in developed and developing countries independently at this time. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42018096858.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32470099     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  11 in total

1.  Indicators for maternal near miss: an observational study, India.

Authors:  Divya Mecheril Balachandran; Dhamotharan Karuppusamy; Dilip Kumar Maurya; Sitanshu Sekhar Kar; Anish Keepanasseril
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 13.831

2.  Ways Forward in Preventing Severe Maternal Morbidity and Maternal Health Inequities: Conceptual Frameworks, Definitions, and Data, from a Population Health Perspective.

Authors:  Suzan L Carmichael; Barbara Abrams; Alison El Ayadi; Henry C Lee; Can Liu; Deirdre J Lyell; Audrey Lyndon; Elliott K Main; Mahasin Mujahid; Lu Tian; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-12-28

3.  Maternal health: Challenges and the way forward.

Authors:  Aruna Menon; Punita Arora
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-04-07

4.  Effects of antenatal care service utilization on maternal near miss in Gamo Gofa zone, southern Ethiopia: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tayue Tateke Kebede; Wanzahun Godana; Mesfin Mamo Utaile; Yemisirach Berhanu Sebsibe
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Severe maternal morbidity and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study in Morang district, Nepal.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Number of antenatal care utilization and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: zero-inflated Poisson regression of 2019 intermediate Ethiopian Demography Health Survey.

Authors:  Mastewal Arefaynie; Bereket Kefale; Melaku Yalew; Bezawit Adane; Reta Dewau; Yitayish Damtie
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Global and regional estimates of maternal near miss: a systematic review, meta-analysis and experiences with application.

Authors:  Tabassum Firoz; Carla Lionela Trigo Romero; Clarus Leung; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-04

8.  Cardiac disease in pregnancy and the first year postpartum: a story of mental health, identity and connection.

Authors:  Jane Hutchens; Jane Frawley; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  The healthcare experiences of women with cardiac disease in pregnancy and postpartum: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jane Hutchens; Jane Frawley; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Feasibility of establishing a Canadian Obstetric Survey System (CanOSS) for severe maternal morbidity: a study protocol.

Authors:  Rohan D'Souza; Rebecca J Seymour; Marian Knight; Susie Dzakpasu; K S Joseph; Sara Thorne; Maria B Ospina; Jon Barrett; Jocelynn Cook; Deshayne B Fell; Heather Scott; Amy Metcalfe; Thomas van den Akker; Stephen Lapinsky; Leslie Skeith; Beth Murray-Davis; Prakesh Shah; Milena Forte; Rizwana Ashraf; Josie Chundamala; Sarah A Hutchinson; Kenneth K Chen; Isabelle Malhamé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.