Literature DB >> 32469654

Survival Benefits of Group Living in a Fluctuating Environment.

Sarah Guindre-Parker, Dustin R Rubenstein.   

Abstract

Group living is predicted to arise only when the fitness benefits outweigh the costs of sociality. Group-living species-including cooperatively breeding and family-living birds and mammals-occur most frequently in environments where climatic conditions fluctuate unpredictably from year to year. The fitness consequences of group living are thus expected to vary with changing environmental conditions, though few studies have examined this possibility. We examined whether living in large social groups improves adult survivorship in cooperatively breeding superb starlings (Lamprotornis superbus). We also tested the hypothesis that larger groups buffer against harsh conditions by increasing survivorship most under periods of low rainfall. We found that group size was positively correlated with adult survival but in a sex-specific manner: female survival increased with group size across all environmental conditions, whereas male survival increased with group size only in wet years. Together with previous work in this system, our results suggest that larger groups confer survival benefits by reducing predation, rather than by improving access to food or buffering against physiological stress. Although group living does not appear to buffer against harsh conditions in adult starlings living in a fluctuating environment, living in larger groups does confer a survival advantage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazards model; group size; survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 32469654     DOI: 10.1086/708496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

1.  Small increases in group size improve small shoals' response to water flow in zebrafish.

Authors:  Piyumika S Suriyampola; Alec A Iruri-Tucker; Lyan Padilla-Veléz; Alejandra Enriquez; Delia S Shelton; Emília P Martins
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.394

2.  Plasticity in social behaviour varies with reproductive status in an avian cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Jasmine Little; Dustin R Rubenstein; Sarah Guindre-Parker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  The ontogeny of selection on genetic diversity in harvester ants.

Authors:  Diane C Wiernasz; Blaine J Cole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Hard-working helpers contribute to long breeder lifespans in cooperative birds.

Authors:  Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Population level consequences of facultatively cooperative behaviour in a stochastic environment.

Authors:  Michela Busana; Dylan Z Childs; Terrence A Burke; Jan Komdeur; David S Richardson; Hannah L Dugdale
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Disentangling climatic and nest predator impact on reproductive output reveals adverse high-temperature effects regardless of helper number in an arid-region cooperative bird.

Authors:  Pietro B D'Amelio; André C Ferreira; Rita Fortuna; Matthieu Paquet; Liliana R Silva; Franck Theron; Claire Doutrelant; Rita Covas
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 11.274

7.  Flexible breeding performance under unstable climatic conditions in a tropical passerine in Southwest China.

Authors:  Chen-Yang Liu; Uriel Gélin; Ru-Chuan He; Huan Li; Rui-Chang Quan
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  The scaling of social interactions across animal species.

Authors:  Luis E C Rocha; Jan Ryckebusch; Koen Schoors; Matthew Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Seasonality impacts collective movements in a wild group-living bird.

Authors:  Danai Papageorgiou; David Rozen-Rechels; Brendah Nyaguthii; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  The Goldilocks effect: female geladas in mid-sized groups have higher fitness.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tinsley Johnson; Jacob A Feder; Thore J Bergman; Amy Lu; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Jacinta C Beehner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.