Literature DB >> 32469128

Laboratory issues in gene therapy and emicizumab.

Annette E Bowyer1, Anna E Lowe2, Stefan Tiefenbacher3.   

Abstract

The treatment options for the haemostatic disorders, haemophilia A and haemophilia B, have progressed rapidly over the last decade. The introduction of extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) concentrates to replace these missing clotting factors highlighted discordance between one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based clotting factor assays and chromogenic factor assays with some products. This raised awareness of the importance of investigation of potential reagent or assay differences by pharmaceutical companies. In 2017, the FVIII mimetic, emicizumab, was approved as a prophylactic treatment for haemophilia A patients with anti-FVIII inhibitors. The mechanism of action of emicizumab causes interference with some commonly used haemostasis tests including the APTT and its associated one-stage APTT-based clotting assays. Chromogenic assays may also be affected but this is dependent on the particular constituents of the reagents. Chromogenic assays containing human factor IXa (FIXa) and factor X (FX) are sensitive to the presence of emicizumab but those containing bovine FIXa and FX are unaffected. Many haemostasis laboratories have been required to evaluate new assays to enable accurate monitoring of emicizumab in patient plasma. A number of gene therapy approaches have been trialled in both haemophilia A and haemophilia B but there are scant data published on the measurement of FVIII and FIX in these patients and whether there are discrepancies between reagents or assay methodologies.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromogenic assay; emicizumab; factor IX; factor VIII; gene therapy; haemophilia

Year:  2020        PMID: 32469128     DOI: 10.1111/hae.13976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  5 in total

1.  Quantification of emicizumab by mass spectrometry in plasma of people with hemophilia A: A method validation study.

Authors:  Anouk A M T Donners; László Gerencsér; Kim C M van der Elst; Toine C G Egberts; Moniek P M de Maat; Albert Huisman; Rolf T Urbanus; Mohsin El Amrani
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Management of a High-Risk Surgery with Emicizumab and Factor VIII in a Child with a Severe Hemophilia A and Inhibitor.

Authors:  Charles R Lefèvre; Anaïs Jaffré; Adeline Pontis; Fabienne Nedelec-Gac; Pierre Guéret; Isabelle Gouin-Thibault; Bernard Fraisse; Sophie Bayart; Benoit Guillet
Journal:  TH Open       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  Current Choices and Management of Treatment in Persons with Severe Hemophilia A without Inhibitors: A Mini-Delphi Consensus.

Authors:  Antonio Coppola; Massimo Franchini; Giovanni Pappagallo; Alessandra Borchiellini; Raimondo De Cristofaro; Angelo Claudio Molinari; Rita Carlotta Santoro; Cristina Santoro; Annarita Tagliaferri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  International consensus recommendations on the management of people with haemophilia B.

Authors:  Daniel P Hart; Davide Matino; Jan Astermark; Gerard Dolan; Roseline d'Oiron; Cédric Hermans; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Adriana Linares; Tadashi Matsushita; Simon McRae; Margareth C Ozelo; Sean Platton; Darrel Stafford; Robert F Sidonio; Andreas Tiede
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2022-04-02

Review 5.  An Update on Laboratory Diagnostics in Haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Jens Müller; Wolfgang Miesbach; Florian Prüller; Thomas Siegemund; Ute Scholz; Ulrich J Sachs
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.145

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.