Literature DB >> 32468349

ASO Author Reflections: Use of Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) to Evaluate Carcinomatosis in Ovarian Cancer.

Karin Stålberg1, Björg Jónsdóttir2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32468349      PMCID: PMC7677252          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08664-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.

Past

The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was introduced by Paul Sugarbaker to describe peritoneal carcinomatosis, initially for colorectal cancer and mesothelioma.1 PCI illustrates the distribution and the volume of carcinomatosis. In colorectal cancer, PCI shows a linear relationship with overall survival2 and affects postoperative quality of life.3 It is not generally recommended to operate on patients with colorectal carcinomatosis with PCI over 20.4 Previous studies on PCI in ovarian cancer are few and heterogeneous, suggesting cutoffs for surgery from 10 to 25, and since many of the studies were conducted, surgery has become more extensive.5,6 However, in most studies (both prospective and retrospective) on ovarian cancer, the FIGO stage is used to categorize the spread of the disease. The FIGO stage is quite a blunt tool with the majority of cases in stage IIIC, including patients with carcinomatosis ranging from a single peritoneal implant ≥ 2 cm in the upper abdomen to massive carcinomatosis. The assessment of PCI gives a more specific measurement and can be used both in preoperative imaging7 for deciding primary treatment (surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and in studies to compare populations.

Present

The main aim of the present study8 was to find a PCI cutoff value for incomplete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with ovarian or fallopian tube cancer. Secondary aims were to identify reasons for open–close surgery and to compare surgical complications in relation to tumor burden. In the study cohort of 167 women, we can demonstrate that perioperative PCI was an excellent predictor of incomplete CRS and surgical complications. We identified two cutoff values for PCI: in patients with PCI > 24, the frequency of incomplete CRS was 32.7%, and 27% had a major complication; the corresponding figures for PCI > 33 were 71.4% incomplete CRS and 43% major complications. In 14 patients (total PCI 27–37), the carcinomatosis was considered inoperable and the abdomen was closed; the reason was massive infiltration on the small bowel in all cases.

Future

Based on our results8 and literature, we suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered when PCI > 24, especially in fragile patients, to achieve optimal surgical outcome and minimize major complications. We recommend that PCI should be used as a standard parameter in clinical management of advanced gynecologic cancers and included in registers and research. Our findings support further studies on PCI in preoperative imaging as more accurate knowledge of tumor load could enhance patient selection before surgery. Our findings strengthen that the focus on preoperative radiology might be evaluation of total tumor burden, since this is strongly associated with operability.
  8 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of Sugarbaker's peritoneal cancer index for the operability of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Bjoern Lampe; Nadine Kroll; Pompiliu Piso; Dirk Michael Forner; Peter Mallmann
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Linear Relationship of Peritoneal Cancer Index and Survival in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthieu Faron; Raluca Macovei; Diane Goéré; Charles Honoré; Léonor Benhaim; Dominique Elias
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  P Jacquet; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  1996

4.  Comparison of MRI and CT for predicting the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) preoperatively in patients being considered for cytoreductive surgical procedures.

Authors:  Russell N Low; Robert M Barone; Janelle Lucero
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  The Peritoneal Cancer Index is a Strong Predictor of Incomplete Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Björg Jónsdóttir; Marta Lomnytska; Inger Sundström Poromaa; Ilvars Silins; Karin Stålberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Early Results from a Prospective Cohort Study of 115 Patients.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Cherry Koh; Nabila Ansari; Michael J Solomon; Kilian Brown; Kate McBride; Jane Young; Christopher J Young; Brendan Moran
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prediction of suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer based on preoperative and intraoperative determination of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index.

Authors:  Antoni Llueca; Anna Serra; Isabel Rivadulla; Luis Gomez; Javier Escrig
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Geert A Simkens; Koen P Rovers; Simon W Nienhuijs; Ignace H de Hingh
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.989

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.