Literature DB >> 32468083

Recognizing and supporting morally injured ICU professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Niek Kok1, Astrid Hoedemaekers2, Hans van der Hoeven2, Marieke Zegers2, Jelle van Gurp3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32468083      PMCID: PMC8824542          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06121-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The COVID-19 pandemic is producing a maelstrom of morally distressing and potentially morally injurious events (pMIEs). PMIEs are defined as “perpetrating, failing to prevent, bearing witness to, or learning about acts that transgress deeply held moral beliefs and expectations” [1]. Moral distress, which occurs when intensive care unit (ICU) professionals cannot fulfill their moral requirements due to internal or contextual constraints, can fade over time. However, moral injury, a concept originating in military psychology, signifies a durable mental wound characterized by symptoms such as guilt, shame, existential or moral conflict, a loss of trust in goodness, moral detachment and/or moral disorientation [1-3]. A person becomes morally injured if exposed to repeated incidents of moral distress or due to a single egregious violation of morality. Particularly in public health disasters, it is important to recognize moral injury with ICU professionals apart from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the aforementioned moral distress. Moral injury, moral distress and PTSD differ with regard to etiology and consequences (see Table 1). PTSD does not necessarily involve guilt, shame, moral conflict or disorientation. The term “moral injury” signifies a deep mental wound, as opposed to a physiological or characterological disorder. Moral injury and PTSD can, however, be comorbid, and both may lead to avoidance symptoms, substance abuse and increased risk of suicide [3].
Table 1

Differences between moral injury, moral distress and PTSD [2, 3, 5]

Moral distressMoral injuryPTSD
Cause or etiologyInability to act according to core moral values or obligations due to internal (e.g., a conscientious objection) or contextual constraints (e.g., restrictions on family visits; resource scarcity)Exposure to repeated incidents of moral distress or due to a single egregious violation of moralityDuring a traumatic event (e.g., experiencing war, being raped), regular physiological stress responses (hyperarousal, increased epinephrine, increased blood flow to muscles) become amplified, and stimuli reminiscent of the trauma trigger the elevated stress state
SymptomatologyFeelings of powerlessness, unfairness, frustration, anger or anxietyPersisting feelings of guilt and/or shame, loss of trust in goodness, moral detachment, moral disorientation, re-experiencing the MIEaUnwanted upsetting memories, nightmares, emotional distress or physical reactivity after exposure to traumatic reminders, re-experiencing the traumatic event
UnderstandingMaybe temporary, episode of distressHard to resolve, mental woundPhysiological or mental disorder
ConsequencesIf it dissipates over time, one’s moral framework remains intact. Repeated or persistent distresses lead to professional dissatisfaction, moral injury, decompensation and burn-outDemoralization, erosion of one’s moral or spiritual framework, self-blame or harm, avoidance of morally conflicting thoughts and feelings, social isolation or alienationAvoidance of trauma-related thoughts, feelings or reminders, decreased interest in activities, hypervigilance, risky or destructive behavior, and difficulty in concentrating and/or sleeping
Examples in ICU practiceAn intensivist worries about having compromised the quality of patient care in his daily round as he was only able to examine half of the 45 COVID-19 patients he was responsible for; a fellow describes feelings of unfairness for compromising quality of care for non-COVID-19 patients, some of whom are in a worse condition than COVID-19 patientsA nurse has care duties for more patients than usual and develops the habit of, at the beginning of her shift, apologizing to COVID-19 patients for not being able to provide them with the care she feels she ought to provide due to time constraints; an intensivist described, for the first time in her career, feeling guilty for blaming patients for having caught the virusWhen asked which private affairs have recently had an impact on one’s working life, an ICU professional expresses ongoing emotional distress with experiencing abuse as a child

aMorally injurious event

Differences between moral injury, moral distress and PTSD [2, 3, 5] aMorally injurious event During the COVID-19 pandemic, ICU professionals who participated in informal interviews and peer support consultations expressed events akin to pMIEs. Professionals described cases in which quality of care and basic care duties were compromised due to being responsible for a large volume of COVID-19 patients. Professionals reported feelings of disorientation, worry, a loss of control and powerlessness. Many professionals explained that because all COVID-19 patients suffer from the same disease and receive similar treatment, and due to restrictions on family visits, patients seemingly become “bodies” without context. Professionals, moreover, sometimes had to act while being confronted with the almost impossible choice between safe working conditions and quality of patient care. The COVID-19 surge demands from ICUs to commit to long-term mental and moral support, as moral injury and a severe loss of moral integrity does not easily or quickly dissolve. Efforts are needed to prevent harm to individual professionals and substantial turnover in a highly qualified workforce. First, we recommend ICUs to set up peer support mechanisms that take into account the needs and wishes of professionals. Generally, intensive care attracts perfectionists who may experience moral demands as especially stringent [4]. Peers should encourage professionals to facilitate self-forgiveness and start re-integrating moral transgressions into their moral code and accept that good persons sometimes, out of necessity, act badly. Since guilt and shame are not easily addressed, peers should aim for building long-lasting working relationships. Second, we advise to stimulate grassroots dialogues on moral requirements in pandemic times. Small-group ethical deliberations help professionals explicate the values and principles at stake and clarify personally felt moral requirements and frameworks. Recognizing the wound is the first step out of moral disorientation and detachment.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: a preliminary model and intervention strategy.

Authors:  Brett T Litz; Nathan Stein; Eileen Delaney; Leslie Lebowitz; William P Nash; Caroline Silva; Shira Maguen
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07-29

Review 2.  A Critical Review: Moral Injury in Nurses in the Aftermath of a Patient Safety Incident.

Authors:  Mady Stovall; Lissi Hansen; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Moral distress and its contribution to the development of burnout syndrome among critical care providers.

Authors:  Renata Rego Lins Fumis; Gustavo Adolpho Junqueira Amarante; Andréia de Fátima Nascimento; José Mauro Vieira Junior
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 6.925

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Mental preparedness for prolonged periods of high workload - What did we learn from the covid-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Mark van den Boogaard; Marieke Zegers
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.235

2.  Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Janet Delgado; Serena Siow; Janet de Groot; Brienne McLane; Margot Hedlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Need for support among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study at an academic hospital in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Leonieke W Kranenburg; Mathijs R de Veer; Karen M Oude Hengel; Tessa A Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij; Anne Pj de Pagter; Witte Jg Hoogendijk; Jan Jv Busschbach; Margo Mc van Mol
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Peer support to improve recovery after critical care for COVID-19.

Authors:  Kimberley J Haines
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 10.714

Review 5.  Healthcare Workers and COVID-19-Related Moral Injury: An Interpersonally-Focused Approach Informed by PTSD.

Authors:  Andrea M D'Alessandro; Kimberly Ritchie; Randi E McCabe; Ruth A Lanius; Alexandra Heber; Patrick Smith; Ann Malain; Hugo Schielke; Charlene O'Connor; Fardous Hosseiny; Sara Rodrigues; Margaret C McKinnon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Chronicling moral distress among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of mental health strain, burnout, and maladaptive coping behaviours.

Authors:  Chloe A Wilson; Hannah Metwally; Smith Heavner; Ann Blair Kennedy; Thomas W Britt
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 7.  How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Elie Azoulay; Hasan M Al-Dorzi; Jason Phua; Jorge Salluh; Alexandra Binnie; Carol Hodgson; Derek C Angus; Maurizio Cecconi; Bin Du; Rob Fowler; Charles D Gomersall; Peter Horby; Nicole P Juffermans; Jozef Kesecioglu; Ruth M Kleinpell; Flavia R Machado; Greg S Martin; Geert Meyfroidt; Andrew Rhodes; Kathryn Rowan; Jean-François Timsit; Jean-Louis Vincent; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Moral Distress Trajectories of Physicians 1 Year after the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Grounded Theory Study.

Authors:  Giulia Lamiani; Davide Biscardi; Elaine C Meyer; Alberto Giannini; Elena Vegni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Moral Distress and Moral Injury in Nephrology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kathryn Ducharlet; Mayuri Trivedi; Samantha L Gelfand; Hui Liew; Lawrence P McMahon; Gloria Ashuntantang; Frank Brennan; Mark Brown; Dominique E Martin
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.299

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.