Literature DB >> 32467450

Wearing an N95 Respiratory Mask: An Unintended Exercise Benefit?

Bryan A Davis1, Lawrence C Tsen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32467450      PMCID: PMC7268846          DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

The N95 or higher-level respirator is an essential element of personal protective equipment to be worn when in contact with patients with known or suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Three varieties are commonly available: preformed/cup, flat fold/duck bill, and elastomeric.[1] Wearing an N95 mask invokes a number of physiologic implications, particularly with prolonged use (greater than 1 h), higher workloads, or an overlying surgical mask (table 1).[2,3] Concomitant surgical mask use augments the impact of a cup mask due to further resistance to airflow, but diminishes the impact of a flat fold mask due to a reduction in deadspace.[2]
Table 1.

Physiologic Implications of N95 Mask Use

Physiologic Implications of N95 Mask Use At 2 metabolic equivalents (e.g., walking slowly during rounds), N95 mask use noticeably increases inhaled carbon dioxide, reduces inspired oxygen, and increases the work of breathing. The resulting inhaled carbon dioxide of 2 to 3% (normal, 0.04%) produces transient acidosis and compensatory increases in minute ventilation, work of breathing, and cardiac output.[2] Symptoms include sweating, visual changes, headache, dyspnea, increased irritability, and decreased reasoning, alertness, and exercise endurance.[3] Independently, the inspired oxygen of 17% (normal, 21%), yields headache, lightheadedness, drowsiness, muscular weakness, dyspnea on exertion, nausea, and vomiting.[4] Simultaneously, the augmented resistance to inspiratory (15% of maximum) and expiratory flow, when experienced for greater than 10 min, results in respiratory alkalosis, increased lactate levels, fatigue, and impaired physical work capacity.[5] However, a number of exercise benefits can be achieved with surprisingly low effort while wearing an N95 mask. At 2 metabolic equivalents, the inspiratory resistance load of 6 to 7 cm H2O (4.5 to 5 mmHg; normal, 1.3 mmHg [men] to 1.6 mmHg [women]) of an N95 mask creates a “respiratory pump” that decreases intrathoracic, central venous, and intracranial pressures,[6] and increases preload, cardiac output, and mean arterial pressure, particularly during hypotensive states.[7] At 4 metabolic equivalents, consciously taking 30 dynamic (fast in) inspiratory efforts twice daily for 4 weeks increases respiratory muscle strength. Maintaining 4 metabolic equivalents of activity for 10 to 30 min, 3 to 5 days/week for 4 weeks improves respiratory muscle endurance. Such conditioning of respiratory muscle strength and respiratory muscle endurance improves ventilatory efficiency (e.g., ventilation-perfusion and alveolar capillary exchange), oxygen delivery/lactate removal at locomotor muscles, and overall exercise performance.[5] Taken together, to inspire us as we don, sustain us as we wear, and cheer us as we doff our N95 masks, we should relish in the many beneficial attributes that are possible “all in a day’s work.”

Research Support

Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
  5 in total

1.  Mask Use for Athletes: A Systematic Review of Safety and Performance Outcomes.

Authors:  Ariana Lott; Timothy Roberts; Cordelia W Carter
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Facemasks during aerobic exercise: Implications for cardiac rehabilitation programs during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tiago Pimenta; Helena Tavares; João Ramos; Mafalda Oliveira; David Reis; Hugo Amorim; Afonso Rocha
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-12

3.  Facemasks during aerobic exercise: Implications for cardiac rehabilitation programs during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tiago Pimenta; Helena Tavares; João Ramos; Mafalda Oliveira; David Reis; Hugo Amorim; Afonso Rocha
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 1.374

4.  Effect of Face Masks on Physiological and Perceptual Responses during 30 Minutes of Self-Paced Exercise in Older Community Dwelling Adults.

Authors:  Grace Vogt; Kimberley Radtke; Andrew Jagim; Dominique Peckumn; Teresa Lee; Richard Mikat; Carl Foster
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  COVID-19 Pandemic in Mountainous Areas: Impact, Mitigation Strategies, and New Technologies in Search and Rescue Operations.

Authors:  Michiel J van Veelen; Anna Voegele; Simon Rauch; Marc Kaufmann; Hermann Brugger; Giacomo Strapazzon
Journal:  High Alt Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 1.981

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.