Literature DB >> 32467262

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Clostridium Isolates from the Poultry Gastrointestinal Tract.

Jitendra Keshri1, Rocio Ramirez1,2, Raja Chalghoumi3, Johnna K Garrish4, Bruce S Seal5, Brian B Oakley6.   

Abstract

Here, we announce the draft genome sequences of two Clostridium strains, C8-1-8 and C2-6-12, isolated from the cecal contents of commercial broiler chickens (in Athens, GA). These strains may represent potentially novel species within the genus Clostridium, and these draft genomes allow further investigation into potential probiotics for poultry.
Copyright © 2020 Keshri et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32467262      PMCID: PMC7256249          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00137-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The taxonomy and systematics of the genus Clostridium are complex and unresolved, but a total of 231 recognized species belonging to the genus Clostridium were reported as of 2019 (http://www.bacterio.net/clostridium.html). We isolated two Clostridium strains, designated strains C8-1-8 and C2-6-12, from the ceca of commercial broiler chickens collected in Athens, Georgia. These strains may represent potentially novel species, as suggested by a comparison based on whole-genome sequencing. The strains were isolated from cecal contents treated with 3% chloroform to eliminate vegetative bacterial cells (1, 2) and cultured in an anaerobic environment on gut microbiota medium (3). Single colonies were subsequently propagated overnight in Luria-Bertani broth for DNA extraction from cultures using the MO BIO UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit. Initial characterizations of the isolates were completed by Gram staining followed by 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. The genomes of both strains were sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform through the Institute for Integrative Genome Biology Genomics Core, University of California, Riverside. Libraries with a fragment length of 150 bp were constructed using the plexWell 96 library preparation kit for Illumina sequencing platforms (seqWell, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA), and totals of 9,074 and 9,415 Mb of paired-end (150-bp) reads were generated for strains C8-1-8 and C2-6-12, respectively. Default parameters for all software were used during analyses unless otherwise specified. Quality filtering of the reads was performed using Trimmomatic v0.39 (4). High-quality reads were used for de novo genome assembly with SPAdes v3.12.0 using the careful assembly method (5). Scaffolds were filtered for a minimum of 200-bp read length and 30× coverage. The quality of the subsequent assemblies was assessed using QUAST (6). Genome completeness was found to be 99.1% for both strains, using the CheckM lineage (7) and Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) (http://microbial-genomes.org) (8) workflows. The species identification tool specI, based on 40 universal single-copy marker genes (9), confirmed that both genomes could not be assigned to any species cluster. Similarly, neither genome could be assigned to a species when compared against reference genomes from the NCBI RefSeq database using MiGA (8). The results of assembly quality analysis by the MiGA workflow based on 106 essential genes were rated as intermediate and high for C8-1-8 and C2-6-12, respectively. The assembled genomes were annotated using the IMG/MER pipeline (10), and average coverage was calculated using the BBMap tool. Assembly and annotation metrics are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Assembly and annotation metrics

StatisticData for strain:
C8-1-8C2-6-12
No. of quality-filtered paired-end reads11,102,70110,624,933
No. of scaffolds116121
N50 (bp)177,332126,571
Largest scaffold length (bp)442,315352,209
Assembly length (bp)6,053,1676,076,981
Avg genome coverage (×)448471
G+C content (%)31.629.02
No. of rRNA genes1410
No. of tRNA genes4757
No. of functional protein-coding genes3,9564,254
No. of hypothetical protein-coding genes1,4131,373
No. of genes associated with KEGG pathways1,2091,354
No. of genes associated with KEGG orthology3,0912,350
GenBank accession no.JAABNO000000000JAABNP000000000
SRA accession no.SRR10903102SRR10903103
Assembly and annotation metrics Based on the compare genome analysis function in IMG, which uses the genome-wide average nucleotide identity (ANI), the maximum pairwise ANI of strain C8-1-8 with available Clostridium genomes (n = 756) was 92.6% with Clostridium sp. strain CT4 (GenBank accession number CP025746; aligned fraction [AF], 79.7%). The maximum ANI of strain C2-6-12 with known Clostridium genomes was 84.8% with Clostridium puniceum DSM 2619 (GenBank accession number LZZM00000000.1; IMG genome identification number 2703719317; AF, 53.8%). Comparing our genomes to all available genomes of Clostridium type strains (n = 80), the maximum ANI for strain C8-1-8 was 73.3% with Clostridium fallax DSM 2631 (AF, 17.8%) and the maximum ANI for strain C2-6-12 was 84.8% (AF, 53.8%) with C. puniceum BL70/20. The ANI between our two isolates was only 72.57%, suggesting that strains C8-1-8 and C2-6-12 are distantly related to each other.

Data availability.

The draft genome and raw read sequences for both strains have been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
  10 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species.

Authors:  Daniel R Mende; Shinichi Sunagawa; Georg Zeller; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies.

Authors:  Alexey Gurevich; Vladislav Saveliev; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species.

Authors:  Koji Atarashi; Takeshi Tanoue; Tatsuichiro Shima; Akemi Imaoka; Tomomi Kuwahara; Yoshika Momose; Genhong Cheng; Sho Yamasaki; Takashi Saito; Yusuke Ohba; Tadatsugu Taniguchi; Kiyoshi Takeda; Shohei Hori; Ivaylo I Ivanov; Yoshinori Umesaki; Kikuji Itoh; Kenya Honda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Production of gnotobiotic mice with normal physiological functions. I. Selection of useful bacteria from feces of conventional mice.

Authors:  K Itoh; T Mitsuoka
Journal:  Z Versuchstierkd       Date:  1980

6.  Extensive personal human gut microbiota culture collections characterized and manipulated in gnotobiotic mice.

Authors:  Andrew L Goodman; George Kallstrom; Jeremiah J Faith; Alejandro Reyes; Aimee Moore; Gautam Dantas; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes.

Authors:  Donovan H Parks; Michael Imelfort; Connor T Skennerton; Philip Hugenholtz; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) webserver: taxonomic and gene diversity analysis of Archaea and Bacteria at the whole genome level.

Authors:  Luis M Rodriguez-R; Santosh Gunturu; William T Harvey; Ramon Rosselló-Mora; James M Tiedje; James R Cole; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes.

Authors:  I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Krishna Palaniappan; Manoj Pillay; Anna Ratner; Jinghua Huang; Marcel Huntemann; Neha Varghese; James R White; Rekha Seshadri; Tatyana Smirnova; Edward Kirton; Sean P Jungbluth; Tanja Woyke; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Natalia N Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.