Literature DB >> 32466803

Recommendations for the use of vascular access in the COVID-19 patients: an Italian perspective.

Mauro Pittiruti1, Fulvio Pinelli2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Central venous catheters; Vascular access devices

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32466803      PMCID: PMC7257200          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02997-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a group of experts from the Italian association GAVeCeLT (Gruppo Accessi Venosi Centrali a Lungo Termine) has formulated a few recommendations for the selection, insertion, and maintenance of the venous access devices, designed to protect the operator, to ensure the effectiveness of the maneuver, to reduce the risk of complications, and to save resources. Recommendations on the appropriate choice of peripheral venous access: In the COVID-19 patient who does not require admission to intensive care unit (ICU), use a peripheral venous access device; prefer a long peripheral cannula (a.k.a. “mini-Midline,” 6–15 cm) [1] or a standard midline catheter (15–25 cm) rather than a short cannula (< 6 cm). Due to their longer dwell time, midline catheters will reduce the number of peripheral venous insertions required (thus saving resources and reducing risks for the operator); they will allow high flow infusions and easy blood sampling; if indicated, they might be easily replaced over guidewire with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Recommendations on the appropriate choice of central venous access: In the COVID-19 patient in ICU, use a central venous access: PICC, FICC (femorally inserted central catheter), or CICC (centrally inserted central catheter). Consider the advantages of using PICCs in patients with severe respiratory distress (no risk of pleuropulmonary complications at insertion), in pronated patients (easy management of the exit site), in anticoagulated patients (no risk of bleeding), in patients on CPAP/NIV (little or no interference with the respiratory management), and/or in tracheostomized patients (lower risk of contamination of the exit site and of exposure of the operator to the patient’s tracheal secretions, if compared to CICCs). Power injectable PICCs can be used safely in ICU [2-4]: they are not associated with additional thrombotic risk if compared to CICC [5, 6], and they are appropriate for measurement of central venous pressure [7] and of cardiac output by thermodilution [8, 9]. Consider the use of femoral access (FICCs) so to minimize the risk of operator contamination by the patient’s oral, nasal, and tracheal secretions during insertion. Choose an exit site at mid-thigh, away from the groin, either by puncturing the common femoral vein and then tunneling to mid-thigh or by directly puncturing the superficial femoral vein at mid-thigh. When inserting a CICC, prefer an infraclavicular approach (ultrasound-guided puncture and cannulation of the axillary vein) rather than a supraclavicular approach, so to provide greater protection and stability of the catheter at the exit site. In the absence of contraindications, give low molecular weight heparin at prophylactic (100 units/kg/24 h) or even therapeutic (100 units/kg/12 h or 150 units/kg/24 h) dose in all COVID-19 patients with central lines, so to reduce the thrombotic risk. Recommendations on the appropriate choice of insertion technique: Use ultrasound guidance for the insertion of any central venous access or midline catheter or peripheral arterial catheter [10-13]. Prefer wireless ultrasound probes, as they allow maximal cleaning of the probe between patients and minimal risk of contamination. In the unavailability of wireless ultrasound probes, the best strategy is to dedicate an ultrasound device exclusively to maneuver on COVID-19 patients. Avoid radiology after central venous cannulation: either transporting the patient to the radiology suite or bringing the radiological equipment to the patient’s bed, the risk of contamination of operators and machinery is very high. The location of the tip of the central venous catheter can be verified by non-radiological methods, such as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) [13, 14]. Tip location by TTE is performed rapidly at bedside using wireless probes with convex or sectorial transducers and adopting the so-called bubble test (rapid infusion of saline with the addition of micro-bubbles of air, visualized by subxiphoid or apical echocardiography) [15]. Tip location by IC-ECG can be easily performed at bedside, either with a standard ECG monitor or with a dedicated wireless ECG monitor. After CICC insertion, immediately after the venipuncture, verify the absence of pleural damage by ultrasound examination of the pleural space, which is more accurate than chest x-ray in the diagnosis of pneumothorax [11, 12]. As the risk of central venous catheter dislodgment is particularly high in the COVID-19 patient, particularly during the maneuvers of pronation-supination, consider the use of subcutaneously anchored securement. Protect the exit site of the catheter sealing it with cyanoacrylate glue (so to prevent local bleeding) and covering it with semi-permeable transparent membranes. Recommendations on the appropriate precautions to avoid operator contamination: For patient protection, adopt the standard barrier precautions (hand hygiene, skin antisepsis with 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol, non-sterile surgical mask, non-sterile cap, sterile gloves, waterproof sterile gown, wide sterile field on the patient, sterile probe cover of appropriate length). For protection of the operator, adopt the standard personal protective equipment for contact protection (double glove, full suit, goggles or face shield, footwear); use both a surgical mask and a protective mask with N95 filter (equivalent to FFP2 of the European nomenclature), considering the high risk of aerosol in the environment, especially in the extubated and symptomatic COVID patient on NIV.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic will undoubtedly change many of our clinical behaviors in the future. We hope that in the field of venous accesses, the positive side effect of this experience can take the form of a new awareness of the need to save resources and increase safety even outside of health emergency situations, adopting winning strategies such as the following: To implement vascular access teams trained to insert any short- or medium-term venous access device, according to the needs of the individual patient. To abandon the routine use of radiology for checking the tip location and ruling out pneumothorax after central venous access insertion, in favor of faster, more accurate, safer, and cheaper methods such as intracavitary electrocardiography and echocardiography; To adopt systematically appropriate technique of infection prevention in order to maximize both patient and operator safety during insertion of vascular access devices.
  13 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management.

Authors:  Fabrizio Poletti; Claudio Coccino; Davide Monolo; Paolo Crespi; Giorgio Ciccioli; Giuseppe Cordio; Giovanni Seveso; Stefano De Servi
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.283

Review 2.  International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access.

Authors:  Massimo Lamperti; Andrew R Bodenham; Mauro Pittiruti; Michael Blaivas; John G Augoustides; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Thierry Pirotte; Dimitrios Karakitsos; Jack Ledonne; Stephanie Doniger; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo; David Feller-Kopman; Wolfram Schummer; Roberto Biffi; Eric Desruennes; Lawrence A Melniker; Susan T Verghese
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  The electrocardiographic method for positioning the tip of central venous catheters.

Authors:  Mauro Pittiruti; Antonio La Greca; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.283

4.  What's really new in the field of vascular access? Towards a global use of ultrasound.

Authors:  Daniele G Biasucci; Antonio La Greca; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo; Mauro Pittiruti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Long peripheral catheters: Is it time to address the confusion?

Authors:  Kirby R Qin; Ramesh M Nataraja; Maurizio Pacilli
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.283

Review 6.  Central venous pressure monitoring via peripherally or centrally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Sanfilippo; Alberto Noto; Gennaro Martucci; Marco Farbo; Gaetano Burgio; Daniele G Biasucci
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.283

7.  European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access).

Authors:  Massimo Lamperti; Daniele Guerino Biasucci; Nicola Disma; Mauro Pittiruti; Christian Breschan; Davide Vailati; Matteo Subert; Vilma Traškaitė; Andrius Macas; Jean-Pierre Estebe; Regis Fuzier; Emmanuel Boselli; Philip Hopkins
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Transthoracic echocardiography as bedside technique to verify tip location of central venous catheters in patients with atrial arrhythmia.

Authors:  Emanuele Iacobone; Daniele Elisei; Diego Gattari; Luigi Carbone; Giuseppe Capozzoli
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.283

9.  Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted with current best practices have low deep vein thrombosis and central line-associated bloodstream infection risk compared with centrally inserted central catheters: A contemporary meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory J Schears; Nicole Ferko; Imran Syed; John-Michael Arpino; Kimberly Alsbrooks
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.283

10.  Clinical experience with power-injectable PICCs in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Mauro Pittiruti; Alberto Brutti; Davide Celentano; Massimiliano Pomponi; Daniele G Biasucci; Maria Giuseppina Annetta; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bedside Peripheral Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access in 253 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Italian Study.

Authors:  Francesco Oleari; Chiara Citterio; Salvatore Bontini; Oriella Grassi; Corrado Gozzo; Jessica Premoli; Maria Pia Mezzi; Stefano Roscio; Monica Muroni; Gabriele Cremona; Claudia Biasini; Patrizia Mordenti; Luigi Cavanna
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15

2.  Central venous catheterization: the cephalic vein access.

Authors:  Shouyin Jiang; Yehua Shen; Xiaogang Zhao
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 19.334

3.  Increase in the frequency of catheter-related bloodstream infections during the COVID-19 pandemic: a plea for control.

Authors:  M J Pérez-Granda; C S Carrillo; P M Rabadán; M Valerio; M Olmedo; P Muñoz; E Bouza
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  COVID-19-Associated Candidiasis: Possible Patho-Mechanism, Predisposing Factors, and Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Nafisa Ahmed; Maiesha Samiha Mahmood; Md Asad Ullah; Yusha Araf; Tanjim Ishraq Rahaman; Abu Tayab Moin; Mohammad Jakir Hosen
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.343

5.  Evaluation of aerosol box use for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation in patients with COVID-19: A short-term randomised study.

Authors:  Gokhan Sertcakacilar; Sunkar Kaya Bayrak; Yaser Pektas; Ipek Bostanci; Gunes Ozlem Yildiz; Mehmet Suleyman Sabaz
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-02-24

6.  Long peripheral cannula in COVID-19 patients: 769 catheter days experience from a semi-intensive respiratory COVID unit.

Authors:  Emanuele Gilardi; Tommaso Grandi; Rosangela Giannuzzi; Fabio Valletta; Solange Fugger; Silvia Mazzaroppi; Martina Petrucci; Alfonso Piano; Andrea Piccioni; Kidane WoldeSellasie; Federica Sambuco; Francesco Travaglino
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Terminology for vascular access devices.

Authors:  Emanuele Iacobone; Fabrizio Brescia; Giuseppe Capozzoli; Daniele Elisei; Davide Giustivi; Antonio L A Greca; Fulvio Pinelli; Mauro Pittiruti
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.860

8.  Technical note and clinical instructions for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in patients with Covid-19: Brazilian Society of Nephrology and Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  José Hermógenes Rocco Suassuna; Emerson Quintino de Lima; Eduardo Rocha; Alan Castro; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Lilian Pires de Freitas do Carmo; Luis Yu; Mauricio Younes Ibrahim; Gustavo Navarro Betônico; Américo Lourenço Cuvello Neto; Maria Olinda Nogueira Ávila; Anderson R Roman Gonçalves; Ciro Bruno Silveira Costa; Nilzete Liberato Bresolin; Andrea Pio de Abreu; Suzana Margareth Ajeje Lobo; Marcelo Mazza do Nascimento
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2020-08-26

9.  Incidence of Candidemia Is Higher in COVID-19 versus Non-COVID-19 Patients, but Not Driven by Intrahospital Transmission.

Authors:  Marina Machado; Agustín Estévez; Carlos Sánchez-Carrillo; Jesús Guinea; Pilar Escribano; Roberto Alonso; Maricela Valerio; Belén Padilla; Emilio Bouza; Patricia Muñoz
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.