Michal Wilk1, Michal Krzysztofik1, Aleksandra Filip1, Agnieszka Szkudlarek2, Robert G Lockie3, Adam Zajac1. 1. Institute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, 40-065 Katowice, Poland. 2. Department of Physical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-055 Katowice, Poland. 3. Center for Sports Performance, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) during successive sets of the bench press (BP) exercise under blood flow restriction (BFR). Methods: The study included 10 strength-trained males (age = 29.8 ± 4.6 years; body mass = 94.3 ± 3.6 kg; BP 1-repetition maximum (1RM) = 168.5 ± 26.4 kg). The experiment was performed following a randomized crossover design, where each participant performed two different exercise protocols: under blood flow restriction (BFR) and control test protocol (CONT) without blood flow restriction. During the experimental sessions, the study participants performed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of the BP exercise at 70%1RM with a 5 min rest interval between sets. The differences in peak power output (PP), mean power output (MP), peak bar velocity (PV), and mean bar velocity (MV) between the CONT and BFR conditions were examined using 2-way (condition × set) repeated measures ANOVA. Furthermore, t-test comparisons between conditions were made for the set 2-set 1, set 3-set 1, and set 3-set 2 delta values for all variables. Results: The post hoc results for condition × set interaction in PP showed a significant increase in set 2 compared to set 1 for BFR (p < 0.01) and CONT (p = 0.01) conditions, a significant increase in set 3 compared to set 1 for the CONT (p = 0.01) condition, as well as a significant decrease in set 3 compared to set 1 for BFR condition occurred (p < 0.01). The post hoc results for condition × set interaction in PV showed a significant increase in set 2 compared to set 1 for BFR (p < 0.01) and CONT (p = 0.01) conditions, a significant increase in set 3 compared to set 1 for CONT (p = 0.03) condition, as well as a significant decrease in set 3 compared to set 1 for BFR condition (p < 0.01). The t-test comparisons showed significant differences in PP (p < 0.01) and PV (p = 0.01) for set 3-set 2 delta values between BFR and CONT conditions. Conclusion: The PAPE effect was analyzed through changes in power output and bar velocity that occurred under both the CONT and BFR conditions. However, the effects of PAPE have different kinetics in successive sets for BFR and for CONT conditions.
RCT Entities:
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) during successive sets of the bench press (BP) exercise under blood flow restriction (BFR). Methods: The study included 10 strength-trained males (age = 29.8 ± 4.6 years; body mass = 94.3 ± 3.6 kg; BP 1-repetition maximum (1RM) = 168.5 ± 26.4 kg). The experiment was performed following a randomized crossover design, where each participant performed two different exercise protocols: under blood flow restriction (BFR) and control test protocol (CONT) without blood flow restriction. During the experimental sessions, the study participants performed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of the BP exercise at 70%1RM with a 5 min rest interval between sets. The differences in peak power output (PP), mean power output (MP), peak bar velocity (PV), and mean bar velocity (MV) between the CONT and BFR conditions were examined using 2-way (condition × set) repeated measures ANOVA. Furthermore, t-test comparisons between conditions were made for the set 2-set 1, set 3-set 1, and set 3-set 2 delta values for all variables. Results: The post hoc results for condition × set interaction in PP showed a significant increase in set 2 compared to set 1 for BFR (p < 0.01) and CONT (p = 0.01) conditions, a significant increase in set 3 compared to set 1 for the CONT (p = 0.01) condition, as well as a significant decrease in set 3 compared to set 1 for BFR condition occurred (p < 0.01). The post hoc results for condition × set interaction in PV showed a significant increase in set 2 compared to set 1 for BFR (p < 0.01) and CONT (p = 0.01) conditions, a significant increase in set 3 compared to set 1 for CONT (p = 0.03) condition, as well as a significant decrease in set 3 compared to set 1 for BFR condition (p < 0.01). The t-test comparisons showed significant differences in PP (p < 0.01) and PV (p = 0.01) for set 3-set 2 delta values between BFR and CONT conditions. Conclusion: The PAPE effect was analyzed through changes in power output and bar velocity that occurred under both the CONT and BFR conditions. However, the effects of PAPE have different kinetics in successive sets for BFR and for CONT conditions.
Entities:
Keywords:
bar velocity; occlusion; performance; power output; upper limb resistance exercise
Authors: Haodong Tian; Hansen Li; Haowei Liu; Li Huang; Zhenhuan Wang; Siyuan Feng; Li Peng Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Michal Wilk; Mariola Gepfert; Michal Krzysztofik; Petr Stastny; Adam Zajac; Gregory C Bogdanis Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Michal Wilk; Michal Krzysztofik; Jakub Jarosz; Pawel Krol; Katarzyna Leznicka; Adam Zajac; Petr Stastny; Gregory C Bogdanis Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Mariola Gepfert; Jakub Jarosz; Grzegorz Wojdala; Michal Krzysztofik; Yuri Campos; Aleksandra Filip-Stachnik; Maciej Kostrzewa; Dawid Gawel; Agnieszka Szkudlarek; Piotr Godlewski; Petr Stastny; Michal Wilk Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2021-02-28 Impact factor: 4.606
Authors: Robert Trybulski; Jakub Jarosz; Michal Krzysztofik; Milena Lachowicz; Grzegorz Trybek; Adam Zajac; Michal Wilk Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Manuel Garcia-Sillero; Iván Chulvi-Medrano; Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; Diego A Bonilla; Salvador Vargas-Molina; Javier Benítez-Porres Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Grzegorz Wojdala; Artur Golas; Michal Krzysztofik; Robert George Lockie; Robert Roczniok; Adam Zajac; Michal Wilk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.390