| Literature DB >> 32466326 |
Yan Hong1, Gangwei Cai2,3, Zhoujin Mo2,4, Weijun Gao5, Lei Xu2, Yuanxing Jiang6, Jinming Jiang5.
Abstract
After the outbreak of COVID-19 (especially in the stage of tourism recovery), the bed and breakfast (B&B) tourism industry faced big challenges in improving its health strategies. B&Bs are very important for the tourism industry in China and many other countries. However, few studies have studied the impact of B&Bs, under COVID-19, on tourism in China. Our paper is among one of the first studies to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on tourist satisfaction with B&Bs in China. The work/travel restrictions started from 20 January 2020, and work/after travel resumed from 20 February 2020 in Zhejiang, China. Data were collected from 588 tourists (who experienced B&Bs in Zhejiang, China) from a WeChat online survey, from 1 March to 15 March 2020. The current study attempted to fill the gap by studying the changing tourist satisfaction levels with B&Bs before/after COVID-19. Moreover, some suggestions are given to the B&B industry for tourism resumption after COVID-19 by an importance-performance analysis (IPA).Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; bed and breakfast (B&B); importance–performance analysis (IPA); tourism resumption; tourist satisfaction
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32466326 PMCID: PMC7277170 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The logical model. Notes: B&B = Bed and Breakfast, BIES = B & B industry evaluation standard, COVID-19 = Corona Virus Disease 2019, IPA = importance–performance analysis, IA = Importance (After COVID-19), PB = Performance (Before COVID-19), QN = Question Number, TS = tourist satisfaction.
Figure 2The impact of SARS on Chinese tourism between 2002 and 2003 [12].
The 30 items to measure B&B experience before/after COVID-19.
| Determinants of Tourist Satisfaction to Ward B&B (Based on Previous Research) | 30 Factors: Importance (after COVID-19)/ Performance (before COVID-19) | QN |
|---|---|---|
| B&B Location [ | Location and nearby facilities are safe and good. | 1 |
| Facility Quality [ | The kitchen and dining room are clean and tidy. | 2 |
| The leisure area is clean and tidy. | 3 | |
| Other service rooms are clean and tidy. | 4 | |
| Buildings are intelligent (e.g., semi–self–service management). | 5 | |
| Places or items for cleaning and disinfection are provided to tourists. | 6 | |
| The building is safe and reliable. | 7 | |
| Room Quality [ | The emergency facilities are complete (such as: first aid kit, escape equipment). | 8 |
| The shading performance is good (e.g., opaque curtains). | 9 | |
| The rooms have plenty of natural light. | 10 | |
| Split air conditioners are used in guest rooms. | 11 | |
| Rooms are naturally ventilated. | 12 | |
| The rooms are spacious and clean. | 13 | |
| The natural landscape outside the window is good. | 14 | |
| The privacy of rooms is good. | 15 | |
| Service Quality [ | Contingency plans are developed and can be exercised regularly. | 16 |
| Green consumption is encouraged and environmental protection measures are implemented. | 17 | |
| Specialties [ | The indoor and outdoor transition spaces are natural and beautiful (e.g., gallery frames, awnings, balconies). | 18 |
| The outdoor space is large and natural (e.g., courtyard, terrace, roof garden). | 19 | |
| The proportion of public space is large. | 20 | |
| The layout of the rooms is scattered. | 21 | |
| Rooms of Single B&B are few and exquisite. | 22 | |
| The local culture is attractive. | 23 | |
| Surrounding Environment [ | The local people around the B&B are kind. | 24 |
| The environment around the B&B is rural and natural. | 25 | |
| Consumption Emotion [ | The B & B atmosphere is good (e.g., leisurely, warm). | 26 |
| The experience and interaction in the space is good. | 27 | |
| Expectation Fulfillment [ | B&B matches the expectations. | 28 |
| Perceived Value [ | B&B is an important part of travel. | 29 |
| Satisfaction [ | Satisfaction with the B&B. | 30 |
Note: IA = Importance (After COVID-19), PB = Performance (Before COVID-19), QN = Question Number.
Figure 3Logic of selection of the 30 questionnaire factors.
Figure 4The importance–performance analysis model. Note: IA = Importance (After COVID-19), PB = Performance (Before COVID-19).
Figure 5The line of different thresholds within the IPA plot. Note: Graphical comparison of scale–centered (IS − PS) and data–centered (ID − PD) approaches [22] in identifying the IPA quadrants.
Profile of survey respondents (n = 588).
| Variable |
| Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 260 | 44.22% |
| Female | 328 | 55.78% |
| Age | ||
| 25–35 | 270 | 45.92% |
| 36–45 | 122 | 20.75% |
| 46–55 | 114 | 19.39% |
| 56–65 | 36 | 6.12% |
| Other | 46 | 7.82% |
| Educational Level | ||
| Associate’s degree | 68 | 11.56% |
| Bachelor’s degree | 300 | 51.02% |
| Graduate degree | 190 | 32.31% |
| Other | 30 | 5.10% |
| Monthly income (US dollar) | ||
| <500 | 36 | 6.12% |
| 501–800 | 114 | 19.39% |
| 801–1200 | 270 | 45.92% |
| 1201–2000 | 122 | 20.75% |
| >2001 | 46 | 7.82% |
| Occupation | ||
| Civil servant | 20 | 3.40% |
| Company employee | 202 | 34.35% |
| Student | 84 | 14.29% |
| Professional | 96 | 16.33% |
| Self–employed | 78 | 13.27% |
| Other | 108 | 18.37% |
Validity statistics.
| Number | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Valid | 588 | 100 |
| Excludeda | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 588 | 100 | |
Reliability Statistics.
| Cronbach’s Alpha | Number of Items |
|---|---|
| 0.978 | 30 IA + 30 PB |
Note: IA = Importance (After COVID-19), PB = Performance (Before COVID-19).
Rank, means of importance and performance and paired samples (n = 588).
| Paired Differences (IA–PB) | IA | PB | Pearson Correlation | Sig. (2–Tailed) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QN | Mean | Rank | Std. Deviation | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | ||
| 21 | 0.833 | 1 | 1.342 | 4.020 | 30 | 3.918 | 24 | 0.299 | 0.000 |
| 11 | 0.769 | 2 | 1.271 | 4.510 | 15 | 4.228 | 17 | 0.370 | 0.000 |
| 6 | 0.697 | 3 | 1.114 | 4.595 | 11 | 4.456 | 8 | 0.426 | 0.000 |
| 22 | 0.507 | 4 | 1.196 | 4.197 | 27 | 4.095 | 20 | 0.446 | 0.000 |
| 16 | 0.493 | 5 | 1.037 | 4.449 | 19 | 4.398 | 12 | 0.547 | 0.000 |
| 5 | 0.459 | 6 | 1.043 | 4.374 | 23 | 4.048 | 21 | 0.555 | 0.000 |
| 12 | 0.350 | 7 | 0.827 | 4.731 | 5 | 4.578 | 1 | 0.539 | 0.000 |
| 8 | 0.337 | 8 | 0.922 | 4.442 | 22 | 3.949 | 23 | 0.541 | 0.000 |
| 13 | 0.327 | 9 | 0.871 | 4.102 | 28 | 3.874 | 27 | 0.655 | 0.000 |
| 19 | 0.282 | 10 | 0.845 | 4.558 | 14 | 4.456 | 9 | 0.596 | 0.000 |
| 17 | 0.272 | 11 | 0.805 | 4.592 | 12 | 4.466 | 7 | 0.677 | 0.000 |
| 20 | 0.228 | 12 | 1.057 | 4.463 | 18 | 4.327 | 14 | 0.537 | 0.000 |
| 1 | 0.221 | 13 | 0.740 | 4.650 | 8 | 4.429 | 10 | 0.649 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 0.214 | 14 | 0.728 | 4.765 | 1 | 4.415 | 11 | 0.605 | 0.000 |
| 10 | 0.207 | 15 | 0.696 | 4.306 | 26 | 4.116 | 19 | 0.635 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 0.194 | 16 | 0.665 | 4.561 | 13 | 3.793 | 29 | 0.642 | 0.000 |
| 18 | 0.190 | 17 | 0.741 | 4.446 | 20 | 4.344 | 13 | 0.727 | 0.000 |
| 7 | 0.187 | 18 | 0.682 | 4.704 | 6 | 4.558 | 2 | 0.669 | 0.000 |
| 9 | 0.163 | 19 | 0.686 | 4.476 | 17 | 4.204 | 18 | 0.736 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 0.153 | 20 | 0.634 | 4.738 | 3 | 4.531 | 4 | 0.665 | 0.000 |
| 15 | 0.146 | 21 | 0.662 | 4.371 | 24 | 3.864 | 28 | 0.661 | 0.000 |
| 14 | 0.139 | 22 | 0.684 | 4.446 | 21 | 3.612 | 30 | 0.688 | 0.000 |
| 27 | 0.136 | 23 | 0.780 | 4.599 | 10 | 3.901 | 25 | 0.631 | 0.000 |
| 24 | 0.126 | 24 | 0.762 | 4.082 | 29 | 4.003 | 22 | 0.623 | 0.000 |
| 28 | 0.102 | 25 | 0.891 | 4.701 | 7 | 4.514 | 6 | 0.701 | 0.006 |
| 29 | 0.102 | 26 | 0.722 | 4.633 | 9 | 4.296 | 16 | 0.755 | 0.001 |
| 25 | 0.102 | 27 | 0.717 | 4.738 | 4 | 4.524 | 5 | 0.728 | 0.001 |
| 26 | 0.102 | 28 | 0.678 | 4.340 | 25 | 3.881 | 26 | 0.693 | 0.000 |
| 30 | 0.078 | 29 | 0.773 | 4.483 | 16 | 4.320 | 15 | 0.709 | 0.014 |
| 23 | 0.051 | 30 | 0.711 | 4.738 | 2 | 4.544 | 3 | 0.726 | 0.042 |
Figure 6The importance (after COVID-19)-performance (before COVID-19) analysis model.