Literature DB >> 32464607

Direct-write 3D printing and characterization of a GelMA-based biomaterial for intracorporeal tissue.

A Asghari Adib1, A Sheikhi, M Shahhosseini, A Simeunović, S Wu, C E Castro, R Zhao, A Khademhosseini, D J Hoelzle.   

Abstract

We develop and characterize a biomaterial formulation and robotic methods tailored for intracorporeal tissue engineering (TE) via direct-write (DW) 3D printing. Intracorporeal TE is defined as the biofabrication of 3D TE scaffolds inside of a living patient, in a minimally invasive manner. A biomaterial for intracorporeal TE requires to be 3D printable and crosslinkable via mechanisms that are safe to native tissues and feasible at physiological temperature (37 °C). The cell-laden biomaterial (bioink) preparation and bioprinting methods must support cell viability. Additionally, the biomaterial and bioprinting method must enable the spatially accurate intracorporeal 3D delivery of the biomaterial, and the biomaterial must adhere to or integrate into the native tissue. Current biomaterial formulations do not meet all the presumed intracorporeal DW TE requirements. We demonstrate that a specific formulation of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)/Laponite®/methylcellulose (GLM) biomaterial system can be 3D printed at physiological temperature and crosslinked using visible light to construct 3D TE scaffolds with clinically relevant dimensions and consistent structures. Cell viability of 71%-77% and consistent mechanical properties over 21 d are reported. Rheological modifiers, Laponite® and methylcellulose, extend the degradation time of the scaffolds. The DW modality enables the piercing of the soft tissue and over-extrusion of the biomaterial into the tissue, creating a novel interlocking mechanism with soft, hydrated native tissue mimics and animal muscle with a 3.5-4 fold increase in the biomaterial/tissue adhesion strength compared to printing on top of the tissue. The developed GLM biomaterial and robotic interlocking mechanism pave the way towards intracorporeal TE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32464607     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab97a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  7 in total

Review 1.  In situ bioprinting: intraoperative implementation of regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Mohamadmahdi Samandari; Azadeh Mostafavi; Jacob Quint; Adnan Memić; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 21.942

Review 2.  3D Tissue and Organ Printing-Hope and Reality.

Authors:  Assaf Shapira; Tal Dvir
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 3.  In Situ 3D Printing: Opportunities with Silk Inks.

Authors:  Francesca Agostinacchio; Xuan Mu; Sandra Dirè; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 21.942

4.  Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication.

Authors:  Daniel J Shiwarski; Andrew R Hudson; Joshua W Tashman; Adam W Feinberg
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-02-16

5.  Exploring the function of stromal cells in cholangiocarcinoma by three-dimensional bioprinting immune microenvironment model.

Authors:  Changcan Li; Bao Jin; Hang Sun; Yunchao Wang; Haitao Zhao; Xinting Sang; Huayu Yang; Yilei Mao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  Technical Aspects and Development of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Klemen Steblovnik; Matjaz Bunc
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 7.  Applications of Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels in Microfluidic Technique-Assisted Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Taotao Liu; Wenxian Weng; Yuzhuo Zhang; Xiaoting Sun; Huazhe Yang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.