| Literature DB >> 32464309 |
Guido Antonelli1, Ombretta Turriziani2, Alessandra Pierangeli3, Gabriella d'Ettorre4, Gioacchino Galardo5, Francesco Pugliese6, Claudio M Mastroianni4, Carolina Scagnolari3.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32464309 PMCID: PMC7237947 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Virol ISSN: 1386-6532 Impact factor: 3.168
Level of type I and II Interferon (IFN) measured in respiratory swabs of COVID-19 patients (n = 50).
| Genes | Ct <40 | % | 2−ΔΔCt |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-alpha | 47/50 | 94.0 | 4.13 (1.22–31.29) |
| IFN-omega | 47/50 | 94.0 | 7.92 (1.30–219.18) |
| IFN-gamma | 0/50 | NA | NA |
Data are expressed as number (percentage) of COVID-19 patients (n = 50) with Ct values lower than 40.
IFN expression data were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method. Each IFN raw Ct value was tagged as undetermined when fell between levels of 40 and 45. Raw Ct values were normalized using the endogenous control (β-glucuronidase) according to the equation: ΔCtIFN = CtIFN - CtGUS. Differences between patients and healthy donors (n = 10) were calculated based on the ΔΔCt measure, where ΔΔCtIFN = ΔCtSARS-CoV-2 – mean (ΔCtHealthyDonors). Expression of IFNs and housekeeping genes mRNAs were evaluated using RT/Real Time PCR [7]. Data are expressed as median (range).