Literature DB >> 32464266

Efficacy and safety of conventional versus daylight photodynamic therapy in children affected by multiple facial flat warts.

Francesco Borgia1, Roberta Giuffrida2, Marialorena Coppola1, Rosaria Princiotta1, Mario Vaccaro1, Fabrizio Guarneri1, Serafinella Patrizia Cannavò1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: facial flat warts (FFWs) are a superficial viral skin disease, extremely common in childhood. Recently, conventional photodynamic therapy (C-PDT) has been used for the treatment of FFWs with good outcome. The efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has not yet been evaluated.
OBJECTIVES: to investigate and assess the efficacy and safety of C-PDT versus DL-PDT using 10% aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in the treatment of recalcitrant FFWs in a paediatric setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 consecutive patients aged <18 years with FFWs of the face were included and randomly divided into two groups: group A (15 patients) was treated with C-PDT and group B (15 patients) with DL-PDT. Patients underwent treatments for three times with 1-month intervals. The response was assessed on week 4,812 and 24 (T4,T8,T12,T24) and scored as excellent (75-100% reduction of total wart count), very good (74-50% reduction), good (49-25% reduction), poor (<25% reduction or no response). Any adverse event occurring during/after ALA application/irradiation as well as pain intensity were recorded at each visit.
RESULTS: at T4 and T8 no excellent response was achieved in both groups. At week 12, excellent response was observed in 53.3% of group A patients vs 0% of group B patients, although in the latter 66.7% of patients achieved a very good response. Excellent outcome raised to 73.3% and 80% in group A and B, respectively, at week 24. Poor response to therapy was observed in 26.7% of patients in group A and 20% in group B. Both treatment modalities were well tolerated, with transient pain, irritation and hyperpigmentation as main side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: ALA-PDT is effective and safe for FFWs, with striking cosmetic results and no recurrence. Compared with conventional modality, DL-PDT is better tolerated, time-saving, nearly painless and greatly appreciated by young patients.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional photodynamic therapy; Daylight photodynamic therapy; HPV; PDT; Treatment; Warts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32464266     DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Photodynamic therapy-trends and new developments].

Authors:  R-M Szeimies; S Karrer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Disease in Children-A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anna Mazur; Katarzyna Koziorowska; Klaudia Dynarowicz; David Aebisher; Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 3.  Aspects of Antiviral Strategies Based on Different Phototherapy Approaches: Hit by the Light.

Authors:  Hannah Kunstek; Fanny Vreken; Aminata Keita; Michael R Hamblin; Florence Dumarçay; Mihayl Varbanov
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13

Review 4.  Photodynamic therapy in pediatric age: Current applications and future trends.

Authors:  Luca Di Bartolomeo; Domenica Altavilla; Mario Vaccaro; Federico Vaccaro; Violetta Squadrito; Francesco Squadrito; Francesco Borgia
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.