| Literature DB >> 32463616 |
Pool Marcos-Carbajal1, Marco Galarza-Pérez2, Salomón Huancahuire-Vega3, Miguel Otiniano-Trujillo4, Javier Soto-Pastrana5.
Abstract
Introduction: The appearance of multidrug-resistant and beta-lactamase producing enterobacteria in outpatient care facilities represent a public health problem in Perú. Objective: To compare the resistance profiles of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and to identify extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing phenotypes in three private health facilities located in the Peruvian coast, Andean and jungle regions. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive study on 98 urine samples from Lima (coast), Juliaca (Andean region) and Iquitos (jungle region) during 2016. We determined the antimicrobial susceptibility in 35 samples from Lima, 38 from Juliaca and 25 from Iquitos using eight antibiotic disks in samples from patients diagnosed with urinary infection. We also evaluated the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases with cefotaxime and ceftazidime disks and a combination of both with clavulanic acid on Mueller-Hinton agar.Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacteriaceae; disk diffusion antimicrobial tests; urinary tract infections; beta-lactamases; drug resistance; Perú
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32463616 PMCID: PMC7449102 DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.4772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedica ISSN: 0120-4157 Impact factor: 0.935
Perfiles de resistencia en 98 aislamientos de E. coli procedentes de tres establecimientos de salud en Perú
| Perfil | Perfiles de resistencia antibiótica | n/N | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT-IPM-AK | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| II | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT-IPM | 4/98 | (4,1) |
| III | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT-NIT | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| IV | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT | 9/98 | (9,2) |
| V | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-IPM | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| VI | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-NIT | 2/98 | (2,0) |
| VII | CAZ-CRO-CIP-SXT-AK | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| VIII | CAZ-CRO-GEN-SXT-IPM | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| IX | CAZ-GEN-SXT-NIT-AK | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| X | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| XI | CAZ-CRO-CIP-SXT | 7/98 | (7,1) |
| XII | CIP-GEN-SXT-NIT | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| XIII | CIP-GEN-SXT | 4/98 | (4,1) |
| XIV | CIP-SXT-IPM | 1/98 | (1,0) |
| XV | GEN-SXT-NIT | 2/98 | (2,0) |
| XVI | Resistencia a dos antibióticos | 16/98 | (16,3) |
| XVII | Resistencia a un antibiótico | 18/98 | (18,4) |
| XVIII | Pansensible | 27/98 | (27,6) |
| Total | 98 | (100) |
CAZ: ceftazidima; CRO: ceftriaxona; CIP: ciprofloxacino; GEN: gentamicina;
Figura 1Número de casos de resistencia antibiótica según establecimiento de salud. Cada barra en color representa el número de casos resistentes por antibiótico. No se observó resistencia a la amikacina y el imipenem en Lima, ni a la amikacina en Iquitos.
Perfil de resistencia en 28 cepas de E. coli con fenotipo productor de BLEE, procedentes de tres establecimientos de salud en Perú
| Perfil | Número de antibióticos | Perfiles de resistencia antibiótica | Número de cepas | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| II | 6 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT-IPM | 4 | 14,3 |
| III | 6 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT-NIT | 1 | 3,6 |
| IV | 5 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-SXT | 9 | 32,1 |
| V | 5 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-IPM | 1 | 3,6 |
| VI | 5 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN-NIT | 2 | 7,2 |
| VII | 5 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-SXT-AK | 1 | 3,6 |
| IX | 5 | CAZ-GEN-SXT-NIT-AK | 1 | 3,6 |
| X | 4 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-GEN | 1 | 3,6 |
| XI | 4 | CAZ-CRO-CIP-SXT | 7 | 25,0 |
| XVI | 2 | CAZ-CRO | 1 | 3,6 |
| Total | 28 | 100 |
CAZ: ceftazidima; CRO: ceftriaxona; CIP: ciprofloxacino; GEN: gentamicina; SXT: trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol; IPM: imipenem; AK: amikacina; NIT: nitrofurantoína
Figura 2Representación porcentual de casos con el fenotipo productor de BLEE y el no productor. Las barras verdes indican la resistencia por antibiótico en cepas con BLEE y las azules, la resistencia por antibiótico en cepas sin BLEE.