| Literature DB >> 32463466 |
Abby F Fleisch1,2, Shravanthi M Seshasayee2, Eric Garshick3,4, Jonathan W Chipman5, Petros Koutrakis6, Emily R Baker7, Margaret R Karagas7,8.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32463466 PMCID: PMC7256667 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Netw Open ISSN: 2574-3805
Characteristics of Participants in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study, Overall and by Home Wood Stove Use in Pregnancy
| Characteristic | Overall (N = 1223) | Wood stove use in pregnancy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 536) | No (n = 687) | |||
| Maternal characteristics | ||||
| Age, median (IQR), y | 31.1 (28.2-34.4) | 31.3 (28.4-34.6) | 31.0 (27.8-34.2) | .06 |
| College graduate | 829 (67.8) | 370 (69.0) | 459 (66.8) | .40 |
| White | 1189 (97.2) | 522 (97.4) | 667 (97.1) | .90 |
| Married | 1032 (84.4) | 465 (86.8) | 567 (82.5) | .05 |
| Nulliparous | 543 (44.4) | 240 (44.8) | 303 (44.2) | .80 |
| Prepregnancy body mass index, median (IQR) | 24.4 (22.0-28.7) | 24.0 (21.7-27.4) | 24.8 (22.1-29.7) | <.001 |
| Cohort enrollment season | ||||
| Spring | 335 (27.4) | 160 (29.9) | 175 (25.5) | .10 |
| Summer | 300 (24.5) | 135 (25.2) | 165 (24.0) | .70 |
| Fall | 261 (21.3) | 103 (19.2) | 158 (23.0) | .13 |
| Winter | 327 (26.7) | 138 (25.7) | 189 (27.5) | .50 |
| Abnormal glucose tolerance | 135 (11.0) | 58 (10.8) | 77 (11.2) | .95 |
| Neighborhood characteristics, median (IQR) | ||||
| Wood stove use in census block, % | 19.6 (10.9-28.8) | 20.8 (12.1-28.9) | 19.0 (9.9-27.9) | .01 |
| Home distance to nearest major roadway, km | 0.8 (0.2-1.9) | 0.9 (0.2-2.1) | 0.8 (0.2-1.7) | .04 |
| Child characteristics | ||||
| Female sex | 604 (49.4) | 277 (51.7) | 327 (47.8) | .20 |
| Birth weight for gestational age | 0.14 (–0.48 to 0.72) | 0.09 (–0.54 to 0.72) | 0.16 (–0.43 to 0.72) | .20 |
| Small birth weight for gestational age | 125 (10.2) | 60 (11.2) | 65 (9.5) | .40 |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
Values are presented as number (percentage) unless otherwise specified.
A total of 32.5% of participants reported using a wood stove during the first trimester (396 of 1220 with first-trimester wood stove data), 34.6% during the second trimester (352 of 1017 with second-trimester wood stove data), and 31.4% during the third trimester (156 of 497 with third-trimester wood stove data).
P values are 2-tailed and compare characteristics between participants who used a wood stove during pregnancy vs those who did not. We used a χ2 test for all categorical variables and a t test for all continuous variables (except maternal age which we evaluated with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test because it was not normally distributed).
Calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Impaired glucose tolerance or gestational diabetes.
Per the 2011-2015 American Community Survey.
Primary or secondary road (ie, Feature Classification Code S1100 or S1200) in 2015 topologically integrated geographic encoding and referencing/Line database.
Less than the 10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age z score.
Figure. Covariate-Adjusted Associations of Household Wood Stove Use During Pregnancy Among Participants in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study
A, Adjusted for maternal age (continuous), education (college graduate or not), race/ethnicity (white or other), marital status (married or not), parity (nulliparous or not), prepregnancy body mass index (continuous), cohort enrollment date (continuous), cohort enrollment season (continuous sine and cosine functions of enrollment date), and neighborhood wood stove use (continuous). We considered but did not include the following covariates that did not confound the exposure-outcome association (ie, change effect estimate by >10%): smoking in current or preceding trimester, alcohol use in current or preceding trimester, and home distance to nearest major roadway. B and C, Adjusted for maternal age (continuous), education (college graduate or not), race/ethnicity (white or other), prepregnancy body mass index (continuous), cohort enrollment season (continuous sine and cosine functions of enrollment date), neighborhood wood stove use (continuous), home distance to nearest major roadway (continuous), and child sex (dichotomous). We considered but did not include the following covariates that did not confound the exposure-outcome association (ie, change effect estimate by greater than 10%): maternal marital status, parity, smoking in current or preceding trimester, alcohol use in current or preceding trimester, and cohort enrollment date.
GDM indicates gestational diabetes; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; SGA, small for gestational age.
aOR (odds ratio), 1.52 (95% CI, 1.02-2.27); P = .04.
bOR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.62-1.52); P = .92.
cOR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.67-1.55); P = .89.
dOR, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.63-1.56); P = .99.
eOR, 1.81 (95% CI, 0.96-3.38); P = .06.
fβ = –0.05 (95% CI, –0.17 to 0.06); P = .38.
gβ = –0.05 (95% CI, –0.17 to 0.08); P = .45.
hβ = –0.17 (95% CI, –0.36 to 0.01); P = .07.