Jamie L Waterland1,2,3, Hilmy Ismail4,5, Babak Amin4, Catherine L Granger6,7, Linda Denehy6,8, Bernhard Riedel4,5. 1. Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. jamie.waterland@petermac.org. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. jamie.waterland@petermac.org. 3. Division of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. jamie.waterland@petermac.org. 4. Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Physiotherapy Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Division of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prehabilitation programs are effective in optimising patient's functional reserve prior to surgery and increasingly associated with reduced postoperative complications. However, acceptability of programs among patients is largely unknown. This study set out to explore the acceptability of prehabilitation from the perspective of patients awaiting major cancer surgery. METHODS: Adult patients awaiting major gastrointestinal and urological cancer surgeries were surveyed. Patients were excluded if they were unable to complete the survey due to language, intellectual impairment and/or visual/hearing deficit. The survey was designed to explore categories related to patient demographics, level of physical activity and perceived enablers and barriers to prehabilitation. RESULTS: One hundred and three participants presenting to a pre-anaesthesia clinic completed the survey over a 5-month period, with 83% response rate. Approximately, half of the respondents were female (55%) and were currently physically active (53%). Fewer than one third (30%) felt they completed 'enough exercise'. The majority of participants (83%) were unfamiliar with the concept of prehabilitation but two thirds (68%) were interested in such a program after explanation. The majority of participants (72%) indicated a strong preference to exercise in a home-based environment. Medical recommendation increased willingness to participate (p < 0.001), while program costs (p = 0.01) were potential barriers to participation. CONCLUSION: Patients are willing to participate in prehabilitation prior to major cancer surgery but practical barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing prehabilitation programs to maximise patient commitment to facilitate improved postoperative outcomes.
PURPOSE: Prehabilitation programs are effective in optimising patient's functional reserve prior to surgery and increasingly associated with reduced postoperative complications. However, acceptability of programs among patients is largely unknown. This study set out to explore the acceptability of prehabilitation from the perspective of patients awaiting major cancer surgery. METHODS: Adult patients awaiting major gastrointestinal and urological cancer surgeries were surveyed. Patients were excluded if they were unable to complete the survey due to language, intellectual impairment and/or visual/hearing deficit. The survey was designed to explore categories related to patient demographics, level of physical activity and perceived enablers and barriers to prehabilitation. RESULTS: One hundred and three participants presenting to a pre-anaesthesia clinic completed the survey over a 5-month period, with 83% response rate. Approximately, half of the respondents were female (55%) and were currently physically active (53%). Fewer than one third (30%) felt they completed 'enough exercise'. The majority of participants (83%) were unfamiliar with the concept of prehabilitation but two thirds (68%) were interested in such a program after explanation. The majority of participants (72%) indicated a strong preference to exercise in a home-based environment. Medical recommendation increased willingness to participate (p < 0.001), while program costs (p = 0.01) were potential barriers to participation. CONCLUSION:Patients are willing to participate in prehabilitation prior to major cancer surgery but practical barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing prehabilitation programs to maximise patient commitment to facilitate improved postoperative outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Prehabilitation; Program design; Surgery; Survey
Authors: Jonathan Moran; Emer Guinan; Paul McCormick; John Larkin; David Mockler; Juliette Hussey; Jeanne Moriarty; Fiona Wilson Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Daniel Steffens; Jane Young; Bernhard Riedel; Rachael Morton; Linda Denehy; Alexander Heriot; Cherry Koh; Qiang Li; Adrian Bauman; Charbel Sandroussi; Hilmy Ismail; Mbathio Dieng; Nabila Ansari; Neil Pillinger; Sarah O'Shannassy; Sam McKeown; Derek Cunningham; Kym Sheehan; Gino Iori; Jenna Bartyn; Michael Solomon Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Jamie L Waterland; Orla McCourt; Lara Edbrooke; Catherine L Granger; Hilmy Ismail; Bernhard Riedel; Linda Denehy Journal: Front Surg Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: Jamie L Waterland; Hilmy Ismail; Catherine L Granger; Cameron Patrick; Linda Denehy; Bernhard Riedel Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2022-08-23
Authors: Sami Sum Yu Wong; Helen Hoi TIng Cheung; Floria Fung Ng; Derek King Wai Yau; Man Kin Henry Wong; Vivian Nga Man Lau; Wing Wa Leung; Tony Wing Chung Mak; Anna Lee Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 3.006