Literature DB >> 32462309

Cranial facet joint injuries in percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement: a matched-pair analysis comparing intraoperative 3D navigation and conventional fluoroscopy.

Marc Hohenhaus1,2, Ralf Watzlawick3,4, Waseem Masalha3,4, Florian Volz3,4, Christoph Scholz3,4, Ulrich Hubbe3,4, Jan-Helge Klingler3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The violation of the cranial adjacent facet is a frequent complication in lumbar instrumentations and can induce local pain and adjacent segment disease. Minimally invasive screw implantation is often stated as risk factor in comparison with open approaches. Percutaneous pedicle screw placement (PPSP) can be performed using single X-ray images (fluoroscopy) or intraoperative 3D navigation. The study compares top-level screws in percutaneous lumbar instrumentations regarding facet violations and screw pedicle position using navigation or fluoroscopy.
METHODS: Patients after lumbar PPSP were retrospectively separated according to the intraoperative technique: navigation (NAV) or fluoroscopy (FLUORO). Two blinded investigators graded the top-level screws regarding facet violations and pedicle breach in postoperative CT scans. Subsequent matched cohort analysis was performed for comparable groups.
RESULTS: Evaluating 768 screws, we assessed 70 (9.1%) facet violations. Overall, 186 (24.2%) screws were implanted using navigation. There was no significant difference in the rate of facet violations between both imaging groups (NAV 19/186, 10.2%, FLUORO 51/582, 8.8%, p = 0.55). Totally, 728 (94.8%) of all screws showed a correct pedicle position. Most of the 40 unfavorable pedicle positions were placed by fluoroscopy (NAV 4/186, 2.2%, FLUORO 36/582, 6.6%, p = 0.03). The matched cohorts verified these results (facet violations: NAV 19/186, 10.2%, FLUORO 18/186, 9.7%, p = 0.55; pedicle penetrations: NAV 4/186, 2.2%, FLUORO 12/186, 6.9%, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Both intraoperative imaging techniques allow lumbar PPSP with low rates of cranial facet violations if the surgeon intends to preserve facet integrity. Navigation was superior concerning accurate pedicle screw position, but could not significantly prevent facet violations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facet violation; Fluoroscopy; Intraoperative imaging; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Navigation; Percutaneous pedicle screw placement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32462309     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06467-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  1 in total

1.  Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Multimodal Applications of 3D-Navigation in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Impacts on Precision, Accuracy, Complications, and Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Pritem A Rajamani; Sandeep Tapashetti; Tushar Sathish Kunder
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

2.  Accuracy Assessment of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Metal Artifact Reduction.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Rawan Al Ansari; Arnaud Collinet; Pierre De Marini; Jean Schwartz; Rami Nachabe; Dirk Schäfer; Bernhard Brendel; Afshin Gangi; Roberto Luigi Cazzato
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.847

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.