PURPOSE: To provide the first report of measuring intracalyceal pressures during ureteroscopy (URS). METHODS: A prospective single-center clinical study using a cardiac pressure guidewire to measure intracalyceal pressure during flexible URS was performed. Eight patients (45 calyces) undergoing URS for nephrolithiasis were included. A Verrata® pressure guide wire was passed through the working channel of a dual lumen flexible ureteroscope and into the calyces while irrigation was maintained at 150 mmHg. Pressure was measured in the renal pelvis, upper pole, interpolar, and lower pole calyces both with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS). The pressure in each location with and without a UAS was compared. The correlation between calyceal pressure and infundibular dimensions (width, length) was determined. RESULTS: Intracalyceal pressure was significantly lower in each region when a UAS was used. Compared to patients with a 12/14Fr UAS, those with a 14/16Fr UAS had significantly lower pressure in the interpolar (25.3 ± 13.1 vs. 44.0 ± 27.5 mmHg, p = 0.03) and lower pole (16.2 ± 3.5 vs. 49.2 ± 40.3 mmHg, p = 0.004) calyces. Interpolar calyceal pressure in the presence of a UAS was significantly higher than the renal pelvis pressure (RPP) (30.8 ± 19.6 vs. 17.9 ± 11.0 mmHg, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: During flexible URS, RPP strongly correlates with, but does not uniformly represent, the intracalyceal pressure. With a 14/16Fr UAS and an inflow pressure of 150 mmHg, RPP and intracalyceal pressure never exceed the threshold for renal backflow.
PURPOSE: To provide the first report of measuring intracalyceal pressures during ureteroscopy (URS). METHODS: A prospective single-center clinical study using a cardiac pressure guidewire to measure intracalyceal pressure during flexible URS was performed. Eight patients (45 calyces) undergoing URS for nephrolithiasis were included. A Verrata® pressure guide wire was passed through the working channel of a dual lumen flexible ureteroscope and into the calyces while irrigation was maintained at 150 mmHg. Pressure was measured in the renal pelvis, upper pole, interpolar, and lower pole calyces both with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS). The pressure in each location with and without a UAS was compared. The correlation between calyceal pressure and infundibular dimensions (width, length) was determined. RESULTS: Intracalyceal pressure was significantly lower in each region when a UAS was used. Compared to patients with a 12/14Fr UAS, those with a 14/16Fr UAS had significantly lower pressure in the interpolar (25.3 ± 13.1 vs. 44.0 ± 27.5 mmHg, p = 0.03) and lower pole (16.2 ± 3.5 vs. 49.2 ± 40.3 mmHg, p = 0.004) calyces. Interpolar calyceal pressure in the presence of a UAS was significantly higher than the renal pelvis pressure (RPP) (30.8 ± 19.6 vs. 17.9 ± 11.0 mmHg, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: During flexible URS, RPP strongly correlates with, but does not uniformly represent, the intracalyceal pressure. With a 14/16Fr UAS and an inflow pressure of 150 mmHg, RPP and intracalyceal pressure never exceed the threshold for renal backflow.