Literature DB >> 32461363

A linear threshold model for optimal stopping behavior.

Christiane Baumann1, Henrik Singmann2, Samuel J Gershman3, Bettina von Helversen4,5.   

Abstract

In many real-life decisions, options are distributed in space and time, making it necessary to search sequentially through them, often without a chance to return to a rejected option. The optimal strategy in these tasks is to choose the first option that is above a threshold that depends on the current position in the sequence. The implicit decision-making strategies by humans vary but largely diverge from this optimal strategy. The reasons for this divergence remain unknown. We present a model of human stopping decisions in sequential decision-making tasks based on a linear threshold heuristic. The first two studies demonstrate that the linear threshold model accounts better for sequential decision making than existing models. Moreover, we show that the model accurately predicts participants' search behavior in different environments. In the third study, we confirm that the model generalizes to a real-world problem, thus providing an important step toward understanding human sequential decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive behavior; cognitive modeling; optimal stopping; sequential decision making

Year:  2020        PMID: 32461363     DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002312117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Subjective optimality in finite sequential decision-making.

Authors:  Yeonju Sin; HeeYoung Seon; Yun Kyoung Shin; Oh-Sang Kwon; Dongil Chung
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

3.  Disentangling choice value and choice conflict in sequential decisions under risk.

Authors:  Laura Fontanesi; Amitai Shenhav; Sebastian Gluth
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  Integrating Reward Information for Prospective Behavior.

Authors:  Sam Hall-McMaster; Mark G Stokes; Nicholas E Myers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.709

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.