Tamas Erdelyi1, Zsofia Lazar1, Balazs Odler1,2, Lilla Tamasi1, Veronika Müller1. 1. Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. 2. Clinical Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Abstract
Background: Inhalation therapy is a cornerstone of treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Inhaler types and through-device inhalation parameters influence airway drug delivery. We aimed to measure the repeatability of inhalation performance through four different commercially available inhalers. Methods: We recruited control subjects (n = 22) and patients with stable COPD (S-COPD, n = 16) and during an acute exacerbation (AE-COPD, n = 15). Standard spirometry was followed by through-device inhalation maneuvers using Ellipta®, Evohaler®, Respimat®, and Genuair®. Through-device inspiratory vital capacity (IVCd) and peak inspiratory flow (PIFd), as well as inhalation time (tin) and breath hold time (tbh), were recorded and all measurements were repeated in a random manner. Results: There was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between patients (S-COPD: 39 ± 5 vs. AE-COPD: 32% ± 5% predicted, p > 0.05). In controls, the IVCd was significantly reduced by all four devices in comparison with the slight reduction seen in COPD patients. In all subjects, PIF was lowered when inhaling through the devices in order of decreasing magnitude in PIFd: Evohaler, Respimat, Ellipta, and Genuair. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a highly variable coefficient of repeatability for IVCd and PIFd through the different inhalers for all COPD patients. Based on the intermeasurement differences in patients, Respimat and Genuair showed the highest repeatability for IVCd, while Genuair and Ellipta performed superior with regard to PIFd. Conclusions: Our study is the first to compare repeatability of inhalation performances through different inhalers in COPD patients, showing great individual differences for parameters influencing lung deposition of inhaled medication from a given device. Our data provide new insight into the characterization of inhaler use by patients with COPD, and might aid the selection of the most appropriate devices to ensure the adequate and consistent delivery of inhaled drugs.
Background: Inhalation therapy is a cornerstone of treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Inhaler types and through-device inhalation parameters influence airway drug delivery. We aimed to measure the repeatability of inhalation performance through four different commercially available inhalers. Methods: We recruited control subjects (n = 22) and patients with stable COPD (S-COPD, n = 16) and during an acute exacerbation (AE-COPD, n = 15). Standard spirometry was followed by through-device inhalation maneuvers using Ellipta®, Evohaler®, Respimat®, and Genuair®. Through-device inspiratory vital capacity (IVCd) and peak inspiratory flow (PIFd), as well as inhalation time (tin) and breath hold time (tbh), were recorded and all measurements were repeated in a random manner. Results: There was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between patients (S-COPD: 39 ± 5 vs. AE-COPD: 32% ± 5% predicted, p > 0.05). In controls, the IVCd was significantly reduced by all four devices in comparison with the slight reduction seen in COPDpatients. In all subjects, PIF was lowered when inhaling through the devices in order of decreasing magnitude in PIFd: Evohaler, Respimat, Ellipta, and Genuair. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a highly variable coefficient of repeatability for IVCd and PIFd through the different inhalers for all COPDpatients. Based on the intermeasurement differences in patients, Respimat and Genuair showed the highest repeatability for IVCd, while Genuair and Ellipta performed superior with regard to PIFd. Conclusions: Our study is the first to compare repeatability of inhalation performances through different inhalers in COPDpatients, showing great individual differences for parameters influencing lung deposition of inhaled medication from a given device. Our data provide new insight into the characterization of inhaler use by patients with COPD, and might aid the selection of the most appropriate devices to ensure the adequate and consistent delivery of inhaled drugs.
Authors: Job F M van Boven; Federico Lavorini; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Francesco Blasi; David B Price; Giovanni Viegi Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: David A Lipson; Frank Barnhart; Noushin Brealey; Jean Brooks; Gerard J Criner; Nicola C Day; Mark T Dransfield; David M G Halpin; MeiLan K Han; C Elaine Jones; Sally Kilbride; Peter Lange; David A Lomas; Fernando J Martinez; Dave Singh; Maggie Tabberer; Robert A Wise; Steven J Pascoe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory J Feldman; Ana R Sousa; David A Lipson; Lee Tombs; Neil Barnes; John H Riley; Sadhana Patel; Ian Naya; Chris Compton; Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 3.845