Literature DB >> 32460134

Moderate disability has negative effect on spatiotemporal parameters in patients with chronic low back pain.

A Demirel1, D Onan2, M Oz2, Y Ozel Aslıyuce2, O Ulger2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known that the patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) has different spatiotemporal characteristics than healthy controls such as average speed, cadence, step and stride length parameters. CLBP is a heterogeneous phenomenon in terms of causing various level of disability. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does disability levels make a difference on spatiotemporal characteristics of patients with CLBP?
METHODS: 66 patients with CLBP and 32 healthy controls between the ages of 25 and 65 years participated to study. The patients who had neurological, orthopedic, cardiovascular, metastatic history excluded from study. Resting, activity and night pain and functional disability were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) respectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to their disability level: moderate and severe. Gait analyses were performed with Optogait treadmill-based photocell system (Version 1.6.4.0, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). After two trials were done, the spatiotemporal characteristics recorded for one minute while patients walked their preferred speed on the treadmill. One-way ANOVA was used to compare these parameters among the perceived disability level (moderate, severe) and healthy controls.The level of significance was accepted as 0.05.
RESULTS: Step length, stride length, and preferred walking speed were the parameters that differentiate the gait between healthy controls and patients with CLBP (p < 0.05). According to post-hoc analyses, moderate CLBP was identified as the group most different from the healthy controls (p < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this study describe how compensating mechanism were seen in CLBP subgroups. As opposed to expectations, an increase in disability would not create higher difference in spatiotemporal characteristics between healthy controls and patients with severe disability. We propose that patients with severe and moderate disability had different ways to normalize their gait.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Gait analysis; Low back pain; Pain

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32460134     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  6 in total

Review 1.  Analysing gait patterns in degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a literature review.

Authors:  Pragadesh Natarajan; R Dineth Fonseka; Sihyong Kim; Callum Betteridge; Monish Maharaj; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  Fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety and depression are associated with motor control and dynamics parameters in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Yannick Delpierre
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-23

3.  Assessment of Selected Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters on Subjects with Pronated Foot Posture on the Basis of Measurements Using OptoGait. A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Inmaculada Requelo-Rodríguez; Aurora Castro-Méndez; Ana María Jiménez-Cebrián; María Luisa González-Elena; Inmaculada C Palomo-Toucedo; Manuel Pabón-Carrasco
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Gait and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Comparative Gait Analysis Study Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Julie Soulard; Jacques Vaillant; Athan Baillet; Philippe Gaudin; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Spatiotemporal parameters and gait variability in people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA): a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Roua Walha; Nathaly Gaudreault; Pierre Dagenais; Patrick Boissy
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  Do people with low back pain walk differently? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jo Armour Smith; Heidi Stabbert; Jennifer J Bagwell; Hsiang-Ling Teng; Vernie Wade; Szu-Ping Lee
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 13.077

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.