Literature DB >> 32459413

Epigenetic Responses to Acute Resistance Exercise in Trained vs. Sedentary Men.

James R Bagley1, Kyle J Burghardt2, Ryan McManus3, Bradley Howlett2, Pablo B Costa3, Jared W Coburn3, Jose A Arevalo3, Moh H Malek4, Andrew J Galpin3.   

Abstract

Bagley, JR, Burghardt, KJ, McManus, R, Howlett, B, Costa, PB, Coburn, JW, Arevalo, JA, Malek, MH, and Galpin, AJ. Epigenetic responses to acute resistance exercise in trained vs. sedentary men. J Strength Cond Res 34(6): 1574-1580, 2020-Acute resistance exercise (RE) alters DNA methylation, an epigenetic process that influences gene expression and regulates skeletal muscle adaptation. This aspect of cellular remodeling is poorly understood, especially in resistance-trained (RT) individuals. The study purpose was to examine DNA methylation in response to acute RE in RT and sedentary (SED) young men, specifically targeting genes responsible for metabolic, inflammatory, and hypertrophic muscle adaptations. Vastus lateralis biopsies were performed before (baseline), 30 minutes after, and 4 hours after an acute RE bout (3 × 10 repetitions at 70% 1 repetition maximum [1RM] leg press and leg extension) in 11 RT (mean ± SEM: age = 26.1 ± 1.0 years; body mass = 84.3 ± 0.2 kg; leg press 1RM = 412.6 ± 25.9 kg) and 8 SED (age = 22.9 ± 1.1 years; body mass = 75.6 ± 0.3 kg; leg press 1RM = 164.8 ± 22.5 kg) men. DNA methylation was analyzed through methylation sensitive high-resolution melting using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Separate 2 (group) × 3 (time) repeated-measures analyses of variance and analyses of covariance were performed to examine changes in DNA methylation for each target gene. Results showed that acute RE (a) hypomethylated LINE-1 (measure of global methylation) in RT but not SED, (b) hypermethylated metabolic genes (GPAM and SREBF2) in RT, while lowering SREBF2 methylation in SED, and (c) did not affect methylation of genes associated with inflammation (IL-6 and TNF-α) or hypertrophy (mTOR and AKT1). However, basal IL-6 and TNF-α were lower in SED compared with RT. These findings indicate the same RE stimulus can illicit different epigenetic responses in RT vs. SED men and provides a molecular mechanism underpinning the need for differential training stimuli based on subject training backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32459413     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Exercise effects on DNA methylation in EVL, CDKN2A (p14, ARF), and ESR1 in colon tissue from healthy men and women.

Authors:  Catherine Duggan; Ming Yu; Amber R Willbanks; Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Ching-Yun Wang; William M Grady; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 2.  Physical-Exercise-Induced Antioxidant Effects on the Brain and Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Jennyffer Souza; Rodrigo Augusto da Silva; Débora da Luz Scheffer; Rafael Penteado; Alexandre Solano; Leonardo Barros; Henning Budde; Andrés Trostchansky; Alexandra Latini
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 3.  Learning From Human Responses to Deconditioning Environments: Improved Understanding of the "Use It or Lose It" Principle.

Authors:  David A Hart
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 4.  Molecular Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Growth and Organelle Biosynthesis: Practical Recommendations for Exercise Training.

Authors:  Robert Solsona; Laura Pavlin; Henri Bernardi; Anthony Mj Sanchez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Impact of Physical Activity and Exercise on the Epigenome in Skeletal Muscle and Effects on Systemic Metabolism.

Authors:  Julio Plaza-Diaz; David Izquierdo; Álvaro Torres-Martos; Aiman Tariq Baig; Concepción M Aguilera; Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.