Literature DB >> 32459047

Cancer risk perception predictors for total body skin examinations: a cross-sectional study using Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017 data.

Julie W Merten1, Hanadi Hamadi2, Meghann Wheeler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of national skin cancer screening recommendations, a total body skin examination by a healthcare provider may detect skin cancer earlier, allowing for more effective treatment and better outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Examine prevalence, demographic, and cancer risk perceptions of adults who have had a skin examination performed by a healthcare provider.
METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults using the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Logistic regressions were performed to identify associations between having a skin examination, risk perceptions, and demographic variables.
RESULTS: Approximately 46% of the sample reported having a skin examination. Females, college graduates, those with a history of skin cancer, people who check their skin for signs of skin cancer, and adults over the age of 45 were more likely to have a skin examination. The people least likely to be screened were those not wanting to know their chances of getting cancer. LIMITATIONS: HINTS is a cross-sectional survey which provides only a glimpse of predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with other studies that people sometimes avoid cancer risk information. An educational intervention focused on the benefits of early cancer detection would benefit people who report not wanting to know their chances of getting cancer.
© 2020 the International Society of Dermatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32459047     DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dermatol        ISSN: 0011-9059            Impact factor:   2.736


  4 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk to improve skin cancer prevention activities among Hispanics.

Authors:  John Charles A Lacson; Scarlet H Doyle; Jocelyn Del Rio; Stephanie M Forgas; Rodrigo Carvajal; Guillermo Gonzalez-Calderon; Adriana Ramírez Feliciano; Youngchul Kim; Richard G Roetzheim; Steven K Sutton; Susan T Vadaparampil; Brenda Soto-Torres; Peter A Kanetsky
Journal:  Cancer Res Commun       Date:  2022-01-11

2.  Personal perception of risk and melanoma awareness in an Irish cohort.

Authors:  Darren Roche; Liana Victory; Akshaya Ravi; Gregg Murray; Anne-Marie Tobin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Psychometric properties of a simplified Chinese version of the cancer predisposition perception scale.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Jiudi Zhong; Wenxia Zhang; Caixia Zhou; Xian Wang; Wenjie Zou; Xiaodan Wu; Meifen Zhang
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-12-25

4.  Impact of personal genomic risk information on melanoma prevention behaviors and psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Martin Allen; Brooke Beswick; Phyllis Butow; Hugh Dawkins; Suzanne J Dobbinson; Kate L Dunlop; David Espinoza; Georgina Fenton; Peter A Kanetsky; Louise Keogh; Michael G Kimlin; Judy Kirk; Matthew H Law; Serigne Lo; Cynthia Low; Graham J Mann; Gillian Reyes-Marcelino; Rachael L Morton; Ainsley J Newson; Jacqueline Savard; Lyndal Trevena; Sarah Wordsworth; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.