Literature DB >> 32459005

Treatment with Zoledronate Subsequent to Denosumab in Osteoporosis: a Randomized Trial.

Anne Sophie Sølling1, Torben Harsløf1, Bente Langdahl1.   

Abstract

Discontinuing denosumab is associated with bone loss and possibly increased fracture risk. We investigated if treatment with zoledronate (ZOL) could prevent bone loss and if the timing of the ZOL infusion influenced the outcome. We report on a 2-year randomized, open label, interventional study including 61 patients with osteopenia, discontinuing denosumab after 4.6 ± 1.6 years. We administrated ZOL 6 months (6M group, n = 20) or 9 months (9M group, n = 20) after the last denosumab injection or when bone turnover had increased (OBS group, n = 21). We monitored the patients with DXA and bone turnover markers. Our primary endpoints were change in lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) 6 months after ZOL and the proportion of patients who failed to maintain BMD. The study is ongoing (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03087851). We included 61 participants and 59 patients completed follow-up 12 months after ZOL. Six months after ZOL, LSBMD had decreased significantly by (mean ± SE) 2.1% ± 0.9%, 4.3% ± 1.1%, and 3.0% ± 1.1% in the 6M, 9M, and OBS groups, respectively, and by 4.8% ± 0.7%, 4.1% ± 1.1%, and 4.7% ± 1.2% 12 months after ZOL in the 6M, 9M, and OBS groups, respectively (p < .02, no between-group differences). BMD loss above the least significant change was seen in all groups; at the spine: 6M, n = 6 (30%); 9M, n = 9 (45%); and OBS, n = 9 (47%); and at the total hip: 6M, n = 1 (5%); 9M, n = 5 (25%); and OBS, n = 2 (11%). In the 6M group p-crosslinked C-terminal telopeptide (p-CTX) decreased initially, but increased rapidly thereafter, and 6 months after ZOL, p-CTX was 0.60 ± 0.08 g/L. p-CTX increased rapidly in the 9M and OBS groups, was suppressed by ZOL but increased again thereafter; p-CTX was 0.47 ± 0.05 μg/L and 0.47 ± 0.05 μg/L in the 9M and OBS groups 6 months after ZOL, respectively. Incident vertebral fractures were seen in two women in the 9M group. Treatment with ZOL irrespective of the timing did not fully prevent loss of BMD in patients discontinuing denosumab.
© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANTIRESORPTIVES; BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVER; CLINICAL TRIAL; DXA; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32459005     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  17 in total

1.  Incidence of Post-denosumab Rebound Hypercalcaemia in Bony-Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ray Wang; Subanki Rajanayagam; Jennifer Ngan; Debra A Renouf
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  Bone remodeling: an operational process ensuring survival and bone mechanical competence.

Authors:  Simona Bolamperti; Isabella Villa; Alessandro Rubinacci
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.362

Review 3.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.879

Review 4.  Which treatment to prevent an imminent fracture?

Authors:  Iconaru Laura; Baleanu Felicia; Charles Alexia; Mugisha Aude; Benoit Florence; Surquin Murielle; Karmali Rafik; Body Jean-Jacques; Bergmann Pierre
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-07-09

5.  Zoledronic acid for prevention of bone loss in patients receiving bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Maya M Côté; Michael C Cheney; Katherine G Lindeman; Claire C Rushin; Matthew M Hutter; Elaine W Yu
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 6.  Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?

Authors:  Jane A Noble; Malachi J McKenna; Rachel K Crowley
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.565

7.  Persistence with oral bisphosphonates and denosumab among older adults in primary care in Ireland.

Authors:  Mary E Walsh; Tom Fahey; Frank Moriarty
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Comparative Effect of Zoledronate at 6 Versus 18 Months Following Denosumab Discontinuation.

Authors:  Athanasios D Anastasilakis; Stergios A Polyzos; Maria P Yavropoulou; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra; Charikleia Ntenti; Stylianos Mandanas; Athanasios Papatheodorou; Polyzois Makras
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Osteoclast Fusion: Physiological Regulation of Multinucleation through Heterogeneity-Potential Implications for Drug Sensitivity.

Authors:  Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Long-Term Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.